Literature DB >> 19468575

[Importance of pleural pressure for the evaluation of respiratory mechanics].

Cláudia Regina Fernandes1.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND AND OBJECTIVES: Pleural pressure has to be known for the partitioning of respiratory system mechanical measurements into their lung and chest wall components. This review aimed at discussing alternative methods to obtain pleural pressure to calculate pulmonary mechanics, at reporting peculiarities of the esophageal balloon method for obtaining indirect pleural pressure, peculiarities of esophageal pressure measurement in sedated or anesthetized patients, at discussing direct pleural pressure and its correlation with esophageal pressure, in addition to reporting on the impact of PEEP on pleural and esophageal pressures. CONTENTS: Esophageal pressure variation reflects pleural pressure variation and may be used as alternative to direct pleural pressure in the study of lungs and chest wall mechanics. Esophageal pressure may be obtained with a delicate balloon placed inside the esophagus. Method and technique were observed and validated in humans and animals in different conditions and body positions. PEEP is a consolidated method for patients under mechanically controlled ventilation, however there are controversies about the close correlation between esophageal and pleural pressure in patients ventilated with PEEP, which may result in wrong respiratory mechanics calculation based on the esophageal pressure.
CONCLUSIONS: The esophageal balloon is the most common method to obtain indirect pleural pressure. In sedated or anesthetized patients without major respiratory compliance changes, esophageal pressure variation corresponds to pleural pressure variation when PEEP is applied.

Entities:  

Year:  2006        PMID: 19468575     DOI: 10.1590/s0034-70942006000300009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Bras Anestesiol        ISSN: 0034-7094            Impact factor:   0.964


  4 in total

1.  A chest drainage system with a real-time pressure monitoring device.

Authors:  Chih-Hao Chen; Tsang-Pai Liu; Ho Chang; Tung-Sung Huang; Hung-Chang Liu; Chao-Hung Chen
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2015-07       Impact factor: 2.895

2.  Influence of different degrees of head elevation on respiratory mechanics in mechanically ventilated patients.

Authors:  Bruno Prata Martinez; Thaís Improta Marques; Daniel Reis Santos; Vanessa Silva Salgado; Balbino Rivail Nepomuceno Júnior; Giovani Assunção de Azevedo Alves; Mansueto Gomes Neto; Luiz Alberto Forgiarini Junior
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2015 Oct-Dec

3.  Model-based PEEP optimisation in mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  Yeong Shiong Chiew; J Geoffrey Chase; Geoffrey M Shaw; Ashwath Sundaresan; Thomas Desaive
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2011-12-23       Impact factor: 2.819

4.  Reproducibility of respiratory mechanics measurements in patients on invasive mechanical ventilation.

Authors:  José da Natividade Menezes Júnior; Ludmilla Mota Silva; Leonardo José Morais Santos; Helena França Correia; Wende Lopes; Virgínia Eugênia Pinheiro E Silva; Jorge Luis Motta Dos Anjos; Bruno Prata Martinez
Journal:  Rev Bras Ter Intensiva       Date:  2020 Jul-Sep
  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.