Literature DB >> 19468196

Reproducibility of the 6-minute walk test for ambulatory oxygen prescription.

Arjun B Chatterjee1, Richard W Rissmiller, Kyle Meade, Connie Paladenech, John Conforti, Norman E Adair, Edward F Haponik, Robert Chin.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Ambulatory oxygen is frequently prescribed for patients with chronic obstructive pulmonary disease (COPD) who have oxygen desaturation </=88% during exercise. The 6-min walk test (6MWT) with continuous pulse oximetry monitoring is a common method to document this oxygen desaturation, but the reproducibility of this test in determining the need for ambulatory oxygen in patients with COPD is not well documented.
OBJECTIVE: The aim of this study was to establish the reproducibility of the 6MWT in determining the need for ambulatory oxygen prescription in stable COPD patients using the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid (CMS) criteria for ambulatory oxygen prescription.
METHODS: The study was designed as a prospective observational study in an academic health center and associated pulmonary rehabilitation program. Eighty-eight COPD patients referred to pulmonary rehabilitation underwent continuous pulse oximetry while performing standard 6MWT on 3 separate days.
RESULTS: Fifty-one (58%) of these patients desaturated by continuous pulse oximetry to an SpO(2) < or = 88% on a least one of the 6MWTs. Only 26 patients (30%) demonstrated consistency in meeting the criteria for ambulatory oxygen set forth by the CMS on all three 6MWT with a kappa statistic of 0.62. The percent agreement between 6MWTs for ambulatory oxygen prescription was 72% and the paired observation was 51%.
CONCLUSIONS: The 6MWT distance is simple and widely used as a consistent measure of functional capacity in patients with COPD; however, the 6MWT oxygen saturation has only modest reproducibility in determining the need for ambulatory oxygen in stable COPD patients undergoing pulmonary rehabilitation. Copyright 2009 S. Karger AG, Basel.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19468196     DOI: 10.1159/000220343

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Respiration        ISSN: 0025-7931            Impact factor:   3.580


  6 in total

1.  Reproducibility of the six-minute walk test and Glittre ADL-test in patients hospitalized for acute and exacerbated chronic lung disease.

Authors:  Anderson José; Simone Dal Corso
Journal:  Braz J Phys Ther       Date:  2015-05-29       Impact factor: 3.377

Review 2.  Comparison of laboratory- and field-based exercise tests for COPD: a systematic review.

Authors:  Iain Fotheringham; Georgina Meakin; Yogesh Suresh Punekar; John H Riley; Sarah M Cockle; Sally J Singh
Journal:  Int J Chron Obstruct Pulmon Dis       Date:  2015-03-19

3.  Portable Oxygen Therapy: Is the 6-Minute Walking Test Overestimating the Actual Oxygen Needs?

Authors:  Daniel Sanchez-Morillo; Alejandro Lara-Doña; Blanca Priego-Torres; Maria Morales-Gonzalez; Francisca Montoro-Ballesteros; Antonio Leon-Jimenez
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2020-12-11       Impact factor: 4.241

Review 4.  Functional Status Assessment of Patients With COPD: A Systematic Review of Performance-Based Measures and Patient-Reported Measures.

Authors:  Yang Liu; Honghe Li; Ning Ding; Ningning Wang; Deliang Wen
Journal:  Medicine (Baltimore)       Date:  2016-05       Impact factor: 1.889

5.  Modelling Modifiable Predictors of Age-Related Cognitive Decline: Exercise, Aortic Stiffness, and the Importance of Physical Fitness.

Authors:  Greg Kennedy; Denny Meyer; Roy J Hardman; Helen Macpherson; Andrew B Scholey; Andrew Pipingas
Journal:  J Alzheimers Dis Rep       Date:  2020-04-07

6.  Evaluation of a Novel Ear Pulse Oximeter: Towards Automated Oxygen Titration in Eyeglass Frames.

Authors:  Fabian Braun; Christophe Verjus; Josep Solà; Marcus Marienfeld; Manuela Funke-Chambour; Jens Krauss; Thomas Geiser; Sabina A Guler
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2020-06-10       Impact factor: 3.576

  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.