Literature DB >> 19468030

The effect of endocrine responsiveness on high-risk breast cancer treated with dose-intensive chemotherapy: results of International Breast Cancer Study Group Trial 15-95 after prolonged follow-up.

M Colleoni1, Z Sun, G Martinelli, R L Basser, A S Coates, R D Gelber, M D Green, F Peccatori, S Cinieri, S Aebi, G Viale, K N Price, A Goldhirsch.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The role of adjuvant dose-intensive chemotherapy and its efficacy according to baseline features has not yet been established. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Three hundred and forty-four patients were randomized to receive seven courses of standard-dose chemotherapy (SD-CT) or three cycles of dose-intensive epirubicin and cyclophosphamide (epirubicin 200 mg/m(2) plus cyclophosphamide 4 mg/m(2) with filgrastim and progenitor cell support). All patients were assigned tamoxifen at the completion of chemotherapy. The primary end point was disease-free survival (DFS). This paper updates the results and explores patterns of recurrence according to predicting baseline features.
RESULTS: At 8.3-years median follow-up, patients assigned DI-EC had a significantly better DFS compared with those assigned SD-CT [8-year DFS percent 47% and 37%, respectively, hazard ratio (HR) 0.76; 95% confidence interval 0.58-1.00; P = 0.05]. Only patients with estrogen receptor (ER)-positive disease benefited from the DI-EC (HR 0.61; 95% confidence interval 0.39, 0.95; P = 0.03).
CONCLUSIONS: After prolonged follow-up, DI-EC significantly improved DFS, but the effect was observed only in patients with ER-positive disease, leading to the hypothesis that efficacy of DI-EC may relate to its endocrine effects. Further studies designed to confirm the importance of endocrine responsiveness in patients treated with dose-intensive chemotherapy are encouraged.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19468030      PMCID: PMC2720817          DOI: 10.1093/annonc/mdp024

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Oncol        ISSN: 0923-7534            Impact factor:   32.976


  25 in total

1.  High-dose chemotherapy for breast cancer: the French PEGASE experience.

Authors:  Henri Roche; Patrice Viens; Pierre Biron; Jean-Pierre Lotz; Bernard Asselain
Journal:  Cancer Control       Date:  2003 Jan-Feb       Impact factor: 3.302

2.  Comparison of rapidly cycled tandem high-dose chemotherapy plus peripheral-blood stem-cell support versus dose-dense conventional chemotherapy for adjuvant treatment of high-risk breast cancer: results of a multicentre phase III trial.

Authors:  Ulrike Anneliese Nitz; Svjetlana Mohrmann; Johannes Fischer; Walter Lindemann; Wolfgang E Berdel; Christian Jackisch; Christoph Werner; Carsten Ziske; Hartmut Kirchner; Bernd Metzner; Rainer Souchon; Ute Ruffert; Gerhart Schütt; Anke Pollmanns; Hans Joachim Schmoll; Constantin Middecke; Jörg Baltzer; Iris Schrader; Herrmann Wiebringhaus; Yon Ko; Siegfried Rösel; Thomas Schwenzer; Peter Wernet; Axel Hinke; Hans Georg Bender; Markus Frick
Journal:  Lancet       Date:  2005-12-03       Impact factor: 79.321

3.  Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy with or without high-dose chemotherapy and autologous stem-cell transplantation in high-risk breast cancer.

Authors:  Martin S Tallman; Robert Gray; Nicholas J Robert; Charles F LeMaistre; C Kent Osborne; William P Vaughan; William J Gradishar; Thomas M Pisansky; John Fetting; Elisabeth Paietta; Hillard M Lazarus
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 91.245

4.  High-dose chemotherapy with hematopoietic stem-cell rescue for high-risk breast cancer.

Authors:  Sjoerd Rodenhuis; Marijke Bontenbal; Louk V A M Beex; John Wagstaff; Dick J Richel; Marianne A Nooij; Emile E Voest; Pierre Hupperets; Harm van Tinteren; Hans L Peterse; Elisabeth M TenVergert; Elisabeth G E de Vries
Journal:  N Engl J Med       Date:  2003-07-03       Impact factor: 91.245

5.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous hematopoietic stem-cell support compared with standard-dose chemotherapy in breast cancer patients with 10 or more positive lymph nodes: first results of a randomized trial.

Authors:  A R Zander; N Kröger; C Schmoor; W Krüger; V Möbus; N Frickhofen; B Metzner; W Schultze; W E Berdel; M Koenigsmann; E Thiel; H Wandt; K Possinger; L Trümper; R Kreienberg; M Carstensen; E H Schmidt; F Jänicke; M Schumacher; W Jonat
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2004-04-26       Impact factor: 44.544

6.  Conventional adjuvant chemotherapy versus single-cycle, autograft-supported, high-dose, late-intensification chemotherapy in high-risk breast cancer patients: a randomized trial.

Authors:  Robert C F Leonard; Michael Lind; Christopher Twelves; Robert Coleman; Simon van Belle; Charles Wilson; Jonathan Ledermann; Ian Kennedy; Peter Barrett-Lee; Timothy Perren; Mark Verrill; David Cameron; Elizabeth Foster; Ann Yellowlees; John Crown
Journal:  J Natl Cancer Inst       Date:  2004-07-21       Impact factor: 13.506

7.  Patterns of treatment effects in subsets of patients in clinical trials.

Authors:  Marco Bonetti; Richard D Gelber
Journal:  Biostatistics       Date:  2004-07       Impact factor: 5.899

8.  1-phenylalanine mustard (L-PAM) in the management of premenopausal patients with primary breast cancer: lack of association of disease-free survival with depression of ovarian function. National Surgical Adjuvant Project for Breast and Bowel Cancers.

Authors:  B Fisher; B Sherman; H Rockette; C Redmond; R Margolese; E R Fisher
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1979-09       Impact factor: 6.860

9.  Design and analysis of randomized clinical trials requiring prolonged observation of each patient. II. analysis and examples.

Authors:  R Peto; M C Pike; P Armitage; N E Breslow; D R Cox; S V Howard; N Mantel; K McPherson; J Peto; P G Smith
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  1977-01       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Duration of adjuvant chemotherapy for breast cancer: a joint analysis of two randomised trials investigating three versus six courses of CMF.

Authors:  M Colleoni; H J Litman; M Castiglione-Gertsch; W Sauerbrei; R D Gelber; M Bonetti; A S Coates; M Schumacher; G Bastert; C-M Rudenstam; C Schmoor; J Lindtner; J Collins; B Thürlimann; S B Holmberg; D Crivellari; C Beyerle; R L A Neumann; A Goldhirsch
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2002-06-05       Impact factor: 7.640

View more
  9 in total

1.  Raf-1 oncogenic signaling is linked to activation of mesenchymal to epithelial transition pathway in metastatic breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Alexey A Leontovich; Shuya Zhang; Cosima Quatraro; Ianko Iankov; Pier Francesco Veroux; Mario W Gambino; Amy Degnim; James McCubrey; James Ingle; Evanthia Galanis; Antonino B D'Assoro
Journal:  Int J Oncol       Date:  2012-03-19       Impact factor: 5.650

2.  High-dose chemotherapy with autologous stem-cell support as adjuvant therapy in breast cancer: overview of 15 randomized trials.

Authors:  Donald A Berry; Naoto T Ueno; Marcella M Johnson; Xiudong Lei; Jean Caputo; Sjoerd Rodenhuis; William P Peters; Robert C Leonard; William E Barlow; Martin S Tallman; Jonas Bergh; Ulrike A Nitz; Alessandro M Gianni; Russell L Basser; Axel R Zander; R Charles Coombes; Henri Roché; Yutaka Tokuda; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Gabriel N Hortobagyi; John P Crown; Paolo Pedrazzoli; Marco Bregni; Taner Demirer
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2011-07-18       Impact factor: 44.544

3.  High-Dose Chemotherapy With Hematopoietic Stem Cell Transplant in Patients With High-Risk Breast Cancer and 4 or More Involved Axillary Lymph Nodes: 20-Year Follow-up of a Phase 3 Randomized Clinical Trial.

Authors:  Tessa G Steenbruggen; Lars C Steggink; Caroline M Seynaeve; Jacobus J M van der Hoeven; Maartje J Hooning; Agnes Jager; Inge R Konings; Judith R Kroep; Wim M Smit; Vivianne C G Tjan-Heijnen; Elsken van der Wall; Adriaan D Bins; Sabine C Linn; Michael Schaapveld; Judy N Jacobse; Flora E van Leeuwen; Carolien P Schröder; Harm van Tinteren; Elisabeth G E de Vries; Gabe S Sonke; Jourik A Gietema
Journal:  JAMA Oncol       Date:  2020-04-01       Impact factor: 31.777

Review 4.  High-dose chemotherapy and autologous bone marrow or stem cell transplantation versus conventional chemotherapy for women with early poor prognosis breast cancer.

Authors:  Cindy Farquhar; Jane Marjoribanks; Anne Lethaby; Maimoona Azhar
Journal:  Cochrane Database Syst Rev       Date:  2016-05-20

5.  Treatment of breast cancer in young women: do we need more aggressive therapies?

Authors:  Giuseppe Cancello; Emilia Montagna
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2013-06       Impact factor: 2.895

6.  Response to neoadjuvant chemotherapy based on pathologic complete response in very young patients with ER-positive breast cancer: a large, multicenter, observational study.

Authors:  Joohyun Woo; Se Jeong Oh; Jeong-Yoon Song; Byung Joo Chae; Jung Eun Choi; Jeeyeon Lee; Heung Kyu Park; Woosung Lim
Journal:  BMC Cancer       Date:  2021-05-31       Impact factor: 4.430

7.  High-dose chemotherapy followed by autologous stem cell transplantation as a first-line therapy for high-risk primary breast cancer: a meta-analysis.

Authors:  Jing Wang; Qiguo Zhang; Rongfu Zhou; Bing Chen; Jian Ouyang
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-03-12       Impact factor: 3.240

8.  Aurora-A mitotic kinase induces endocrine resistance through down-regulation of ERα expression in initially ERα+ breast cancer cells.

Authors:  Mateusz Opyrchal; Jeffrey L Salisbury; Shuya Zhang; James McCubrey; John Hawse; Mattew P Goetz; Gwen A Lomberk; Tufia Haddad; Amy Degnim; Carol Lange; James N Ingle; Evanthia Galanis; Antonino B D'Assoro
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-05-09       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Changes in ovarian function in premenopausal women with breast cancer undergoing adjuvant TC (docetaxel and cyclophosphamide) chemotherapy during a brief period of amenorrhea around the last chemotherapy cycle.

Authors:  Keiko Yoshimura; Yoshihiko Furuya
Journal:  Springerplus       Date:  2014-07-10
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.