Literature DB >> 19467605

Photochemical internalization (PCI) in cancer therapy: from bench towards bedside medicine.

Ole-Jacob Norum1, Pål Kristian Selbo, Anette Weyergang, Karl-Erik Giercksky, Kristian Berg.   

Abstract

PDT in cancer therapy has been reviewed several times recently and many published reports have been showing promising results. The clinical approvals for PDT include curative treatment of early or superficial cancers and palliative treatment of more advanced disease. Still PDT has yet to become a widely used cancer treatment. This may partly be due to limitations in current PDT regimens and partly due to effective alternative treatment modalities. If the specificity and selectivity of PDT could be improved, PDT would probably make substantial progress and comprise an even more competitive alternative in cancer treatment. The PCI technology is based on the same principles as PDT, the activation of a photosensitizer by light and subsequently followed by formation of reactive oxygen species. Unlike PDT, the photosensitizer used in PCI has to be located in the endocytic vesicles of the targeted cells and will, upon activation of light, induce a release of endocytosed therapeutic agents after a photochemically induced rupture of the endocytic vesicles. The endocytosed therapeutic agent will then be released and may reach their intracellular target of action before being degraded in lysosomes. This site-specific drug delivery induced by PCI will take place in addition to the well described cytotoxic, vascular and immunostimulatory effects of PDT. PCI has been shown to facilitate intracellular delivery of a large variety of macromolecules that do not otherwise readily penetrate the plasma membrane, including type I ribosome-inactivating proteins (RIPs), RIP-based immunotoxins, genes and some chemotherapeutic agents. Several animal models have been used for in vivo documentation of the PCI principle and more animal models of clinical relevance have recently been utilized for addressing clinical issues. This review will focus on the possibilities and limitations offered by PCI to overcome some of the challenges recognized in current PDT regimens in cancer treatment.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19467605     DOI: 10.1016/j.jphotobiol.2009.04.012

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Photochem Photobiol B        ISSN: 1011-1344            Impact factor:   6.252


  21 in total

Review 1.  Photodynamic therapy of cancer: an update.

Authors:  Patrizia Agostinis; Kristian Berg; Keith A Cengel; Thomas H Foster; Albert W Girotti; Sandra O Gollnick; Stephen M Hahn; Michael R Hamblin; Asta Juzeniene; David Kessel; Mladen Korbelik; Johan Moan; Pawel Mroz; Dominika Nowis; Jacques Piette; Brian C Wilson; Jakub Golab
Journal:  CA Cancer J Clin       Date:  2011-05-26       Impact factor: 508.702

2.  Effects of endosomal photodamage on membrane recycling and endocytosis.

Authors:  Michelle Andrzejak; Marie Santiago; David Kessel
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol       Date:  2011-02-10       Impact factor: 3.421

3.  Inhibition of endocytic processes by photodynamic therapy.

Authors:  David Kessel
Journal:  Lasers Surg Med       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 4.025

Review 4.  The role of photodynamic therapy in overcoming cancer drug resistance.

Authors:  Bryan Q Spring; Imran Rizvi; Nan Xu; Tayyaba Hasan
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2015-04-09       Impact factor: 3.982

5.  Effects of photodynamic therapy on the endocytic pathway.

Authors:  David Kessel; Michael Price; Joseph Caruso; John Reiners
Journal:  Photochem Photobiol Sci       Date:  2010-12-02       Impact factor: 3.982

6.  Anion-dependent fluorescence in bis(anilinoethynyl)pyridine derivatives: switchable ON-OFF and OFF-ON responses.

Authors:  Calden N Carroll; Brian A Coombs; Sean P McClintock; Charles A Johnson; Orion B Berryman; Darren W Johnson; Michael M Haley
Journal:  Chem Commun (Camb)       Date:  2011-04-07       Impact factor: 6.222

Review 7.  Smart micro/nanoparticles in stimulus-responsive drug/gene delivery systems.

Authors:  Mahdi Karimi; Amir Ghasemi; Parham Sahandi Zangabad; Reza Rahighi; S Masoud Moosavi Basri; H Mirshekari; M Amiri; Z Shafaei Pishabad; A Aslani; M Bozorgomid; D Ghosh; A Beyzavi; A Vaseghi; A R Aref; L Haghani; S Bahrami; Michael R Hamblin
Journal:  Chem Soc Rev       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 54.564

8.  Targeted cytosolic delivery of cell-impermeable compounds by nanoparticle-mediated, light-triggered endosome disruption.

Authors:  Sébastien Febvay; Davide M Marini; Angela M Belcher; David E Clapham
Journal:  Nano Lett       Date:  2010-06-09       Impact factor: 11.189

9.  Silencing of ferrochelatase enhances 5-aminolevulinic acid-based fluorescence and photodynamic therapy efficacy.

Authors:  L Teng; M Nakada; S-G Zhao; Y Endo; N Furuyama; E Nambu; I V Pyko; Y Hayashi; J-I Hamada
Journal:  Br J Cancer       Date:  2011-02-08       Impact factor: 7.640

10.  Harnessing photochemical internalization with dual degradable nanoparticles for combinatorial photo-chemotherapy.

Authors:  George Pasparakis; Theodore Manouras; Maria Vamvakaki; Panagiotis Argitis
Journal:  Nat Commun       Date:  2014-04-07       Impact factor: 14.919

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.