Literature DB >> 19466944

Outcome after radical cystectomy in patients with clinical T2 bladder cancer in whom neoadjuvant chemotherapy has failed.

Murugesan Manoharan1, Devendar Katkoori, Thekke A Kishore, Bruce Kava, Rakesh Singal, Mark S Soloway.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To analyse the outcome after radical cystectomy (RC) in patients with clinical T2 bladder cancer not responding to neoadjuvant chemotherapy (NAC). PATIENTS AND METHODS: In a retrospective analysis, study patients received NAC for clinical T2 disease before RC and a control group had RC for clinical T2 disease with no NAC. Patients treated with NAC were further grouped based on the pathological response; failure to respond was defined as 'no change in T stage or a higher T stage in the RC specimen (>or=pT2)', and the relevant clinical and pathological data were analysed.
RESULTS: In all, 53 patients satisfied the inclusion criteria for the study group and 200 for the control group. In the study group 18 (34%) responded to NAC (group 1) of whom 11 (61%) were pT0 and seven (39%) pT1, and among the non-responders (group 2) 19 (54%) were pT3/pT4 and 16 (46%) were pT2; 16 (46%) patients in group 2 had lymph node metastasis. The mean follow-up was 26 months. In group 2, local recurrence occurred in six (17%) vs none in group 1. Seven patients (20%) in group 2 developed metastases, vs one (5%) in group 1 (P = 0.01). The 5-year disease-free survival was significantly lower for group 2 (40%) than group 1 (91%, P = 0.007) and the control group (67%, P = 0.04). There were 14 deaths from bladder cancer in group 2, vs one in group I (P = 0.01). The 5-year disease-specific survival was significantly lower for group 2 (52%) than group 1 (83%, P = 0.008) and the control group (70%, P = 0.001).
CONCLUSION: A lack of response to NAC is associated with a significantly higher local and distant recurrence, and with lower survival.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19466944     DOI: 10.1111/j.1464-410X.2009.08626.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  BJU Int        ISSN: 1464-4096            Impact factor:   5.588


  11 in total

1.  Biomarkers for platinum sensitivity in bladder cancer: are we there yet?

Authors:  Nirmish Singla; Rashed A Ghandour; Ganesh V Raj
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2019-07

2.  Differences in the recurrence pattern after neoadjuvant chemotherapy compared to surgery alone in patients with muscle-invasive bladder cancer.

Authors:  Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Atsushi Imai; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Tohru Yoneyama; Yuki Tobisawa
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-12-04       Impact factor: 3.064

3.  Retrospective analysis of survival in muscle-invasive bladder cancer: impact of pT classification, node status, lymphovascular invasion, and neoadjuvant chemotherapy.

Authors:  Amber M D'Souza; Kamal S Pohar; Tahir Arif; Susan Geyer; Debra L Zynger
Journal:  Virchows Arch       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 4.064

Review 4.  Adjuvant radiotherapy for pathological high-risk muscle invasive bladder cancer: time to reconsider?

Authors:  Paul Sargos; Brian C Baumann; Libni J Eapen; Amit Bahl; Vedang Murthy; Guilhem Roubaud; Mathieu Orré; Jason A Efstathiou; Shahrokh Shariat; Stephane Larré; Pierre Richaud; John P Christodouleas
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2016-10

5.  Use of Adjuvant Chemotherapy in Patients with Advanced Bladder Cancer after Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Wilson Sui; Emerson A Lim; G Joel Decastro; James M McKiernan; Christopher B Anderson
Journal:  Bladder Cancer       Date:  2017-07-27

6.  Adjuvant chemotherapy in patients with locally advanced bladder cancer after neoadjuvant chemotherapy and radical cystectomy: a systematic review and pooled analysis.

Authors:  Zhiyong Cai; Hang Jin; Jinbo Chen; Jiao Hu; Huihuang Li; Zhenglin Yi; Xiongbing Zu
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2021-01

7.  Neoadjuvant and adjuvant chemotherapy for muscle-invasive bladder cancer: The likelihood of initiation and completion.

Authors:  Ahmed Eldefrawy; Mark S Soloway; Devendar Katkoori; Rakesh Singal; David Pan; Murugesan Manoharan
Journal:  Indian J Urol       Date:  2012-10

8.  Genomic Differences Between "Primary" and "Secondary" Muscle-invasive Bladder Cancer as a Basis for Disparate Outcomes to Cisplatin-based Neoadjuvant Chemotherapy.

Authors:  Eugene J Pietzak; Emily C Zabor; Aditya Bagrodia; Joshua Armenia; Wenhuo Hu; Ahmet Zehir; Samuel Funt; Francois Audenet; David Barron; Noelia Maamouri; Qiang Li; Min Yuen Teo; Maria E Arcila; Michael F Berger; Nikolaus Schultz; Guido Dalbagni; Harry W Herr; Dean F Bajorin; Jonathan E Rosenberg; Hikmat Al-Ahmadie; Bernard H Bochner; David B Solit; Gopa Iyer
Journal:  Eur Urol       Date:  2018-10-02       Impact factor: 24.267

9.  Neoadjuvant gemcitabine and carboplatin followed by immediate cystectomy may be associated with a survival benefit in patients with clinical T2 bladder cancer.

Authors:  Takuya Koie; Chikara Ohyama; Hayato Yamamoto; Atsushi Imai; Shingo Hatakeyama; Takahiro Yoneyama; Yasuhiro Hashimoto; Tohru Yoneyama; Yuki Tobisawa
Journal:  Med Oncol       Date:  2014-04-04       Impact factor: 3.064

10.  Is adjuvant chemotherapy better than neoadjuvant chemotherapy for those with node positive disease?

Authors:  Joseph Zabell; Badrinath Konety
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2018-12
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.