AIM: To identify whether time and risk preference predicts relapse among smokers trying to quit. DESIGN: A cohort study of smokers who had recently started to quit. Time and risk preference parameters were estimated using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 689 smokers who began quitting smoking within the previous month. MEASUREMENTS: Time discount rate, coefficient of risk-aversion measured at study entry and duration of smoking cessation measured for 6 months. FINDINGS: In the unadjusted model, Cox's proportional hazard regression showed that those with a high time discount rate were more likely to relapse [hazard ratio: 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.25]. A high coefficient of risk-aversion reduced the hazard of relapse (0.96, 0.96-0.97). When adjusted for other predictors of relapse (age, gender, self-efficacy of quitting, health status, mood variation, past quitting experience, the use of nicotine replacement therapy, nicotine dependence), the hazard ratios of time discount rate and the coefficient of risk-aversion is 1.17 (95% CI: 1.10-1.24) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Those who emphasize future rewards (time-patient preference) and those who give more importance to rewards that are certain (higher risk-aversion) were significantly more likely to continue to abstain from smoking.
AIM: To identify whether time and risk preference predicts relapse among smokers trying to quit. DESIGN: A cohort study of smokers who had recently started to quit. Time and risk preference parameters were estimated using a discrete choice experiment (DCE). PARTICIPANTS: A total of 689 smokers who began quitting smoking within the previous month. MEASUREMENTS: Time discount rate, coefficient of risk-aversion measured at study entry and duration of smoking cessation measured for 6 months. FINDINGS: In the unadjusted model, Cox's proportional hazard regression showed that those with a high time discount rate were more likely to relapse [hazard ratio: 1.18, 95% confidence interval (CI): 1.11-1.25]. A high coefficient of risk-aversion reduced the hazard of relapse (0.96, 0.96-0.97). When adjusted for other predictors of relapse (age, gender, self-efficacy of quitting, health status, mood variation, past quitting experience, the use of nicotine replacement therapy, nicotine dependence), the hazard ratios of time discount rate and the coefficient of risk-aversion is 1.17 (95% CI: 1.10-1.24) and 0.98 (95% CI: 0.97-0.99), respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Those who emphasize future rewards (time-patient preference) and those who give more importance to rewards that are certain (higher risk-aversion) were significantly more likely to continue to abstain from smoking.
Authors: Ramzi G Salloum; Christine W Abbyad; Racquel E Kohler; Allison K Kratka; Leighanne Oh; Kathryn A Wood Journal: Nicotine Tob Res Date: 2014-09-19 Impact factor: 4.244
Authors: Peter A Hall; Geoffrey T Fong; Hua-Hie Yong; Genevieve Sansone; Ron Borland; Mohammad Siahpush Journal: Addict Behav Date: 2012-07-07 Impact factor: 3.913
Authors: Meryem Grabski; H Valerie Curran; David J Nutt; Stephen M Husbands; Tom P Freeman; Meg Fluharty; Marcus R Munafò Journal: Addiction Date: 2016-08-08 Impact factor: 6.526