Literature DB >> 19466918

Urinary ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) assessment: valuable tools to improve verification of abstention in alcohol-dependent patients during in-patient treatment and at follow-ups.

Klaus Junghanns1, Iris Graf, Juliane Pflüger, Gunnar Wetterling, Christian Ziems, Dieter Ehrenthal, Maike Zöllner, Leif Dibbelt, Jutta Backhaus, Wolfgang Weinmann, Friedrich M Wurst.   

Abstract

AIMS: The aims of this study were (i) to assess the effect of additional urinary ethyl glucuronide (EtG) and ethyl sulphate (EtS) assessment on diagnosed relapse rates in detoxified alcohol-dependent patients; and (ii) to compare dropout rates between EtG- and EtS-negative and -positive patients.
DESIGN: Two studies on detoxified alcohol-dependent patients. If patients had no indication of relapse they were asked for a urinary sample at discharge from in-patient treatment 3, 6 and 12 weeks after discharge (study 1) and 1, 3 and 6 weeks after discharge (study 2), respectively.
SETTING: Department of Psychiatry, University of Luebeck, Germany. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 107 and 32 detoxified alcohol-dependent patients having participated in a 3-week in-patient motivation enhancement programme. MEASUREMENT: Personal interviews, breathalyzer tests, assessment of urinary EtG and EtS with liquid chromatography-tandem mass spectrometry (LC-MS/MS analysis). FINDING: Urinary EtG and EtS were always positive at the same time. In the first study 13.5% of the patients were already positive before being discharged from hospital. At the follow-ups 3, 6 and 12 weeks after discharge 12.2, 19.4 and 28.0%, respectively, of the patients coming to the follow-up and denying relapse were positive on urinary EtG and EtS. In the second study, of those patients showing up for follow-up after 1 week and denying relapse, EtG and EtS were positive in four cases (17.4%). Only one EtG- and EtS-positive relapser (3.1%) came to the next follow-ups. In both studies the rates of detected relapses were significantly higher for early follow-ups if urinary EtG and EtS results were considered additionally. Dropout rates until the next follow-up were significantly higher among positive than EtG- and EtS-negative patients.
CONCLUSION: Urinary EtG and EtS improve verification of abstinence in studies of alcohol-dependent patients.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19466918     DOI: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2009.02566.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Addiction        ISSN: 0965-2140            Impact factor:   6.526


  7 in total

1.  Clinical (nonforensic) application of ethyl glucuronide measurement: are we ready?

Authors:  Peter Jatlow; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2010-04-05       Impact factor: 3.455

2.  Sensitivity and specificity of urinary ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate in liver disease patients.

Authors:  Scott H Stewart; David G Koch; Douglas M Burgess; Ira R Willner; Adrian Reuben
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2012-06-22       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 3.  Interventions to reduce alcohol use among HIV-infected individuals: a review and critique of the literature.

Authors:  Jennifer L Brown; Kelly S DeMartini; Jessica M Sales; Andrea L Swartzendruber; Ralph J DiClemente
Journal:  Curr HIV/AIDS Rep       Date:  2013-12       Impact factor: 5.071

4.  Review of current clinical biomarkers for the detection of alcohol dependence.

Authors:  Hamid R Tavakoli; Michael Hull; Lt Michael Okasinski
Journal:  Innov Clin Neurosci       Date:  2011-03

5.  Ethyl glucuronide and ethyl sulfate assays in clinical trials, interpretation, and limitations: results of a dose ranging alcohol challenge study and 2 clinical trials.

Authors:  Peter I Jatlow; Ann Agro; Ran Wu; Haleh Nadim; Benjamin A Toll; Elizabeth Ralevski; Christine Nogueira; Julia Shi; James D Dziura; Ismene L Petrakis; Stephanie S O'Malley
Journal:  Alcohol Clin Exp Res       Date:  2014-04-28       Impact factor: 3.455

Review 6.  Protein biomarkers of alcohol abuse.

Authors:  Mariana P Torrente; Willard M Freeman; Kent E Vrana
Journal:  Expert Rev Proteomics       Date:  2012-08       Impact factor: 3.940

Review 7.  A Review on Flexible Electrochemical Biosensors to Monitor Alcohol in Sweat.

Authors:  Nuna G Costa; Joana C Antunes; Antonio J Paleo; Ana M Rocha
Journal:  Biosensors (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-16
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.