Literature DB >> 19466735

Outcome--more than just operative mortality.

Murray F Brennan1, Mark Radzyner, David M Rubin.   

Abstract

Historical reviews of outcome following major operations for cancer have focused on the readily measurable, operative mortality. The interrelationship of surgeon and institutional volume to improved perioperative outcome has been confirmed. More current studies now relate long term cancer survival to other issues of specialization, volume, payor and institution. The challenge is to determine what volume thresholds are sufficient for acceptable outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19466735     DOI: 10.1002/jso.21174

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Surg Oncol        ISSN: 0022-4790            Impact factor:   3.454


  4 in total

1.  Redefining mortality after pancreatic cancer resection.

Authors:  James Edward Carroll; Jillian K Smith; Jessica P Simons; Melissa M Murphy; Sing Chau Ng; Shimul A Shah; Zheng Zhou; Jennifer F Tseng
Journal:  J Gastrointest Surg       Date:  2010-09-16       Impact factor: 3.452

2.  Cost effectiveness after a pancreaticoduodenectomy: bolstering the volume argument.

Authors:  Jeffrey M Sutton; Gregory C Wilson; Ian M Paquette; Koffi Wima; Dennis J Hanseman; R Cutler Quillin; Jeffrey J Sussman; Michael J Edwards; Syed A Ahmad; Shimul A Shah; Daniel E Abbott
Journal:  HPB (Oxford)       Date:  2014-07-16       Impact factor: 3.647

Review 3.  Symptom and functional recovery monitoring in thoracic surgery.

Authors:  Virginia Sun; Jae Kim
Journal:  J Thorac Dis       Date:  2020-11       Impact factor: 2.895

4.  Systematic review of grading systems for adverse surgical outcomes.

Authors:  Saba Balvardi; Etienne St-Louis; Yasmine Yousef; Asra Toobaie; Elena Guadagno; Robert Baird; Dan Poenaru
Journal:  Can J Surg       Date:  2021-03-26       Impact factor: 2.089

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.