BACKGROUND: There is not general agreement concerning the optimal time of reperfusion necessary to assess myocardial function and necrosis on isolated perfused heart model. Nevertheless, the study of cardioprotection (especially, pre- and postconditioning) requires a reliable and standardized assessment of myocardial necrosis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was thus to evaluate whether 1 h of reperfusion was sufficient to assess rat heart viability on Langendorff preparation. Isolated rat hearts (n = 30) underwent 40 min of global normothermic ischemia followed by 60 or 120 min Langendorff reperfusion. In each group, hearts were also randomly assigned into the 2 following sub-groups: postconditioning (PostC, consisting in 2 episodes of 30 s ischemia and 30 s reperfusion at the onset of reperfusion), and control (no intervention). Coronary flow, heart rate, dP/dt and rate-pressure-product were measured. Myocardial necrosis was assessed by TTC staining and LDH, CK release analysis. RESULTS: Our results indicated that heart function tended to slightly decrease between 60 min and 120 min reperfusion. Infarct size was identical at 60 min and 120 min reperfusion, averaging 33-34% of total LV area in controls versus 17% in PostC (p < 0.001 between control and PostC groups). Similarly, the maximum of enzymatic releases (CK and LDH) measured in coronary effluents was at 60 min of reperfusion, followed by a progressive decrease at 90 min and 120 min. As expected, postconditioning limited enzymatic releases whatever the studied time of reperfusion. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we showed that prolonged reperfusion beyond 60 min was not useful for function assessment and did not change infarct size measurement, on Langendorff rat model of ischemia-reperfusion.
BACKGROUND: There is not general agreement concerning the optimal time of reperfusion necessary to assess myocardial function and necrosis on isolated perfused heart model. Nevertheless, the study of cardioprotection (especially, pre- and postconditioning) requires a reliable and standardized assessment of myocardial necrosis. OBJECTIVE: The objective of this study was thus to evaluate whether 1 h of reperfusion was sufficient to assess rat heart viability on Langendorff preparation. Isolated rat hearts (n = 30) underwent 40 min of global normothermic ischemia followed by 60 or 120 min Langendorff reperfusion. In each group, hearts were also randomly assigned into the 2 following sub-groups: postconditioning (PostC, consisting in 2 episodes of 30 s ischemia and 30 s reperfusion at the onset of reperfusion), and control (no intervention). Coronary flow, heart rate, dP/dt and rate-pressure-product were measured. Myocardial necrosis was assessed by TTC staining and LDH, CK release analysis. RESULTS: Our results indicated that heart function tended to slightly decrease between 60 min and 120 min reperfusion. Infarct size was identical at 60 min and 120 min reperfusion, averaging 33-34% of total LV area in controls versus 17% in PostC (p < 0.001 between control and PostC groups). Similarly, the maximum of enzymatic releases (CK and LDH) measured in coronary effluents was at 60 min of reperfusion, followed by a progressive decrease at 90 min and 120 min. As expected, postconditioning limited enzymatic releases whatever the studied time of reperfusion. CONCLUSION: In conclusion, we showed that prolonged reperfusion beyond 60 min was not useful for function assessment and did not change infarct size measurement, on Langendorff rat model of ischemia-reperfusion.
Authors: Hans Erik Bøtker; Derek Hausenloy; Ioanna Andreadou; Salvatore Antonucci; Kerstin Boengler; Sean M Davidson; Soni Deshwal; Yvan Devaux; Fabio Di Lisa; Moises Di Sante; Panagiotis Efentakis; Saveria Femminò; David García-Dorado; Zoltán Giricz; Borja Ibanez; Efstathios Iliodromitis; Nina Kaludercic; Petra Kleinbongard; Markus Neuhäuser; Michel Ovize; Pasquale Pagliaro; Michael Rahbek-Schmidt; Marisol Ruiz-Meana; Klaus-Dieter Schlüter; Rainer Schulz; Andreas Skyschally; Catherine Wilder; Derek M Yellon; Peter Ferdinandy; Gerd Heusch Journal: Basic Res Cardiol Date: 2018-08-17 Impact factor: 17.165
Authors: Janet R Manning; Dharendra Thapa; Manling Zhang; Michael W Stoner; Javier Traba; Charles F McTiernan; Catherine Corey; Sruti Shiva; Michael N Sack; Iain Scott Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2019-02-15 Impact factor: 5.000
Authors: Daniel J Herr; Mauhamad Baarine; Sverre E Aune; Xiaoyang Li; Lauren E Ball; John J Lemasters; Craig C Beeson; James C Chou; Donald R Menick Journal: J Mol Cell Cardiol Date: 2017-12-07 Impact factor: 5.000