Literature DB >> 19466442

Cochlear implant and hearing aid: a new approach to optimizing the fitting in this bimodal situation.

Annerose M Keilmann1, Andrea M Bohnert, Jan Gosepath, Wolf J Mann.   

Abstract

More and more patients with residual hearing on the contralateral side are becoming candidates for cochlear implants (CI) surgery due to increasing CI. The major benefits of regular binaural hearing are spatial hearing, localization, and signal source discrimination in both quiet and noisy surroundings. In most of the reports, hearing aid fitting was carried out without balancing both the devices. Twelve children and eight adults with residual hearing on the non-operated side were binaurally fitted. Our fitting procedure for the hearing aid was based on the desired sensation level [i/o] method. A loudness scaling was used to adjust the loudness perception monaurally and to balance the volume of both devices. Speech audiometry in quiet and noisy surroundings was conducted both monaurally and in the bimodal mode. The fitting was modified according to the respective test results. In all children and six adults, a measurable gain and/or a subjective improvement of speech perception was achieved. Two adult patients did not accept the new fitting. In seven younger children, loudness scaling was impossible to perform because of age. This was also the case with speech audiometry for two children. A structured bimodal fitting using loudness scaling for both the cochlear implant and the hearing aid results in a subjective and objective amelioration of the patient's hearing and speech perception.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19466442     DOI: 10.1007/s00405-009-0993-9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur Arch Otorhinolaryngol        ISSN: 0937-4477            Impact factor:   2.503


  23 in total

1.  Comparison of two methods for estimating the sensation level of amplified speech.

Authors:  R C Seewald; S P Hudson; J P Gagné; D L Zelisko
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  1992-06       Impact factor: 3.570

2.  [Speech audiometry and new word-tests].

Authors:  K H HAHLBROCK
Journal:  Arch Ohren Nasen Kehlkopfheilkd       Date:  1953

3.  Combined electric and contralateral acoustic hearing: word and sentence recognition with bimodal hearing.

Authors:  René H Gifford; Michael F Dorman; Sharon A McKarns; Anthony J Spahr
Journal:  J Speech Lang Hear Res       Date:  2007-08       Impact factor: 2.297

4.  Binaural benefits for adults who use hearing aids and cochlear implants in opposite ears.

Authors:  Teresa Y C Ching; Paula Incerti; Mandy Hill
Journal:  Ear Hear       Date:  2004-02       Impact factor: 3.570

5.  Speech perception in noise with implant and hearing aid.

Authors:  M Armstrong; P Pegg; C James; P Blamey
Journal:  Am J Otol       Date:  1997-11

6.  Speech perception with a cochlear implant used in conjunction with a hearing aid in the opposite ear.

Authors:  Jafar Hamzavi; Stefan Marcel Pok; Wolfgang Gstoettner; Wolf-Dieter Baumgartner
Journal:  Int J Audiol       Date:  2004       Impact factor: 2.117

7.  [The Mainz audiometric speech test for children (author's transl)].

Authors:  P Biesalski; H Leitner; E Leitner; D Gangel
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1974-05       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Speech Recognition in noise in children with cochlear implants while listening in bilateral, bimodal, and FM-system arrangements.

Authors:  Erin C Schafer; Linda M Thibodeau
Journal:  Am J Audiol       Date:  2006-12       Impact factor: 1.493

9.  Hearing progress and fluctuations in bimodal-binaural hearing users (unilateral cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aid).

Authors:  Michal Luntz; Noam Yehudai; Talma Shpak
Journal:  Acta Otolaryngol       Date:  2007-10       Impact factor: 1.494

10.  [The Göttingen audiometric speech test for children. I. Speech audiometry of the young and retarded child by a picture-test (author's transl)].

Authors:  R Chilla; P Gabriel; P Kozielski; D Bänsch; M Kabas
Journal:  HNO       Date:  1976-10       Impact factor: 1.284

View more
  9 in total

1.  Evaluation of hearing aid frequency response fittings in pediatric and young adult bimodal recipients.

Authors:  Lisa S Davidson; Jill B Firszt; Chris Brenner; Jamie H Cadieux
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2015-04       Impact factor: 1.664

2.  An analysis of hearing aid fittings in adults using cochlear implants and contralateral hearing aids.

Authors:  Michael S Harris; Marcia Hay-McCutcheon
Journal:  Laryngoscope       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 3.325

3.  Aiding and occluding the contralateral ear in implanted children with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorder.

Authors:  Christina L Runge; Jamie Jensen; David R Friedland; Ruth Y Litovsky; Sergey Tarima
Journal:  J Am Acad Audiol       Date:  2011-10       Impact factor: 1.664

4.  Exploring the factors influencing discontinued hearing aid use in patients with unilateral cochlear implants.

Authors:  Elizabeth M Fitzpatrick; Stéphanie Leblanc
Journal:  Trends Amplif       Date:  2011-03-14

Review 5.  Considerations for Fitting Cochlear Implants Bimodally and to the Single-Sided Deaf.

Authors:  Sabrina H Pieper; Noura Hamze; Stefan Brill; Sabine Hochmuth; Mats Exter; Marek Polak; Andreas Radeloff; Michael Buschermöhle; Mathias Dietz
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2022 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.496

6.  Bimodal cochlear implants: the role of acoustic signal level in determining speech perception benefit.

Authors:  Michael F Dorman; Philip Loizou; Shuai Wang; Ting Zhang; Anthony Spahr; Louise Loiselle; Sarah Cook
Journal:  Audiol Neurootol       Date:  2014-07-02       Impact factor: 1.854

7.  [Inpatient rehabilitation of adult CI users: Results in dependency of duration of deafness, CI experience and age].

Authors:  R Zeh; U Baumann
Journal:  HNO       Date:  2015-08       Impact factor: 1.284

8.  Self-Reported Usage, Functional Benefit, and Audiologic Characteristics of Cochlear Implant Patients Who Use a Contralateral Hearing Aid.

Authors:  Arlene C Neuman; Susan B Waltzman; William H Shapiro; Jonathan D Neukam; Annette M Zeman; Mario A Svirsky
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2017-01       Impact factor: 3.293

9.  Objective Binaural Loudness Balancing Based on 40-Hz Auditory Steady-State Responses. Part II: Asymmetric and Bimodal Hearing.

Authors:  Maaike Van Eeckhoutte; Dimitar Spirrov; Jan Wouters; Tom Francart
Journal:  Trends Hear       Date:  2018 Jan-Dec       Impact factor: 3.293

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.