Graham J Emslie1, Daniel Ventura2, Andrew Korotzer2, Stavros Tourkodimitris2. 1. Dr. Emslie is with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Drs. Ventura, Korotzer, and Tourkodimitris are with the Forest Research Institute. Electronic address: graham.emslie@utsouthwestern.edu. 2. Dr. Emslie is with the University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center. Drs. Ventura, Korotzer, and Tourkodimitris are with the Forest Research Institute.
Abstract
OBJECTIVE: This article presents the results from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram in adolescent patients with major depressive disorder. METHOD: Male and female adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with escitalopram 10 to 20 mg/day (n = 155) or placebo (n = 157). The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline to week 8 in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) score using the last observation carried forward approach. RESULTS: A total of 83% patients (259/312) completed 8 weeks of double-blind treatment. Mean CDRS-R score at baseline was 57.6 for escitalopram and 56.0 for placebo. Significant improvement was seen in the escitalopram group relative to the placebo group at endpoint in CDRS-R score (-22.1 versus -18.8, p =.022; last observation carried forward). Adverse events occurring in at least 10% of escitalopram patients were headache, menstrual cramps, insomnia, and nausea; only influenza-like symptoms occurred in at least 5% of escitalopram patients and at least twice the incidence of placebo (7.1% versus 3.2%). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 2.6% for escitalopram and 0.6% for placebo. Serious adverse events were reported by 2.6% and 1.3% of escitalopram and placebo patients, respectively, and incidence of suicidality was similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, escitalopram was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of depressed adolescents.
RCT Entities:
OBJECTIVE: This article presents the results from a prospective, randomized, double-blind, placebo-controlled trial of escitalopram in adolescent patients with major depressive disorder. METHOD: Male and female adolescents (aged 12-17 years) with DSM-IV-defined major depressive disorder were randomly assigned to 8 weeks of double-blind treatment with escitalopram 10 to 20 mg/day (n = 155) or placebo (n = 157). The primary efficacy parameter was change from baseline to week 8 in Children's Depression Rating Scale-Revised (CDRS-R) score using the last observation carried forward approach. RESULTS: A total of 83% patients (259/312) completed 8 weeks of double-blind treatment. Mean CDRS-R score at baseline was 57.6 for escitalopram and 56.0 for placebo. Significant improvement was seen in the escitalopram group relative to the placebo group at endpoint in CDRS-R score (-22.1 versus -18.8, p =.022; last observation carried forward). Adverse events occurring in at least 10% of escitaloprampatients were headache, menstrual cramps, insomnia, and nausea; only influenza-like symptoms occurred in at least 5% of escitaloprampatients and at least twice the incidence of placebo (7.1% versus 3.2%). Discontinuation rates due to adverse events were 2.6% for escitalopram and 0.6% for placebo. Serious adverse events were reported by 2.6% and 1.3% of escitalopram and placebo patients, respectively, and incidence of suicidality was similar for both groups. CONCLUSIONS: In this study, escitalopram was effective and well tolerated in the treatment of depressed adolescents.
Authors: Bret R Rutherford; Joel R Sneed; Jane M Tandler; David Rindskopf; Bradley S Peterson; Steven P Roose Journal: J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry Date: 2011-06-15 Impact factor: 8.829
Authors: Graham J Emslie; Apurva Prakash; Qi Zhang; Beth A Pangallo; Mark E Bangs; John S March Journal: J Child Adolesc Psychopharmacol Date: 2014-05-09 Impact factor: 2.576
Authors: Cosima Locher; Helen Koechlin; Sean R Zion; Christoph Werner; Daniel S Pine; Irving Kirsch; Ronald C Kessler; Joe Kossowsky Journal: JAMA Psychiatry Date: 2017-10-01 Impact factor: 21.596