Literature DB >> 19465497

Reproductive performance of heifers offered ad libitum or restricted access to feed for a one hundred forty-day period after weaning.

A J Roberts1, T W Geary, E E Grings, R C Waterman, M D MacNeil.   

Abstract

Reproductive performance was evaluated in composite heifers born over a 3-yr period that were randomly assigned to control (fed to appetite; n = 205) or restricted (fed at 80% of that consumed by controls adjusted to a common BW basis; n = 192) feeding for a 140-d period, beginning about 2 mo after weaning at 6 mo of age and ending at about 12.5 mo of age. Heifers were fed a diet of 67% corn silage, 18% alfalfa, and 9% of a protein-mineral supplement (DM basis). Restricted heifers consumed 27% less feed over the 140 d and had less ADG (0.53 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.65 +/- 0.01 kg/d; P < 0.001) than control heifers. After 140 d, all heifers were placed in common pens and subjected to an estrous synchronization protocol to facilitate AI at about 14 mo of age. Heifers were then exposed to bulls for the remainder of a 51-d breeding season. Average BW of heifers diverged within 28-d after initiation of feed restriction, and differences (P < 0.001) persisted through the prebreeding period (309 +/- 1 vs. 326 +/- 1 kg at approximately 13.5 mo of age) and subsequent grazing season (410 +/- 2 vs. 418 +/- 2 kg at about 19.5 mo of age). From the end of the 140-d restriction at about 12.5 to 19.5 mo of age, ADG was greater (P < 0.001) in restricted heifers than control heifers (0.51 +/- 0.01 vs. 0.47 +/- 0.01 kg/d). Proportion of heifers attaining puberty by 14 mo of age tended to be less (P = 0.1) in restricted (60 +/- 3%) than control-fed heifers (68 +/- 3%). Mean BW at puberty was less (P < 0.01) in restricted (309 kg) than control (327 kg) heifers. Pregnancy rate from AI tended to be less (P = 0.08) in restricted (48 +/- 4%) than control heifers (57 +/- 3%). Proportion of animals that were pubertal at breeding and pregnant from AI were positively associated (P < 0.1) with heifer age and ADG from birth to beginning of study. Final pregnancy rates were 87 and 91% for restricted and control heifers, respectively (P = 0.27). Day of breeding season that conception occurred was negatively associated with ADG from birth to weaning (P = 0.005), but was not associated with ADG within treatment (P = 0.60). Economic analysis revealed a $33 reduction in cost to produce a pregnant heifer under the restricted protocol when accounting for pregnancy rates and differences in BW and market prices between selection at weaning and marketing as open heifers at l.5 yr of age. A potential economic advantage exists for rearing replacement heifers on a restricted level of feeding during the postweaning period.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19465497     DOI: 10.2527/jas.2008-1476

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Sci        ISSN: 0021-8812            Impact factor:   3.159


  17 in total

1.  Performance, endocrine, metabolic, and reproductive responses of Nellore heifers submitted to different supplementation levels pre- and post-weaning.

Authors:  Aline Gomes da Silva; Mário Fonseca Paulino; Lincoln da Silva Amorim; Luciana Navajas Rennó; Edenio Detmann; Felipe Henrique de Moura; Marcos Rocha Manso; Paulo Henrique Silva E Paiva; Román Enrique Maza Ortega; Luciano Prímola de Melo
Journal:  Trop Anim Health Prod       Date:  2017-02-11       Impact factor: 1.559

2.  Genetic parameters for fertility and production traits in Red Angus cattle.

Authors:  Ryan J Boldt; Scott E Speidel; Milton G Thomas; R Mark Enns
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-09-29       Impact factor: 3.159

3.  Effect of forage species and supplement type on rumen kinetics and serum metabolites in growing beef heifers grazing winter forage.

Authors:  Z D McFarlane; R P Barbero; R L G Nave; E B Maheiros; R A Reis; J T Mulliniks
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

4.  Genomic prediction of continuous and binary fertility traits of females in a composite beef cattle breed.

Authors:  S Toghiani; E Hay; P Sumreddee; T W Geary; R Rekaya; A J Roberts
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-11       Impact factor: 3.159

5.  Genotype × prenatal and post-weaning nutritional environment interaction in a composite beef cattle breed using reaction norms and a multi-trait model.

Authors:  El Hamidi Hay; Andy Roberts
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2018-03-06       Impact factor: 3.159

6.  Developmental and reproductive characteristics of beef heifers classified by pubertal status at time of first breeding.

Authors:  A J Roberts; A Gomes da Silva; A F Summers; T W Geary; R N Funston
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2017-12       Impact factor: 3.159

Review 7.  BEEF SPECIES-RUMINANT NUTRITION CACTUS BEEF SYMPOSIUM: Influence of management decisions during heifer development on enhancing reproductive success and cow longevity1.

Authors:  Adam F Summers; Shelby L Rosasco; Eric J Scholljegerdes
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2019-03-01       Impact factor: 3.159

8.  Effect of calfhood nutrition on metabolic hormones, gonadotropins, and estradiol concentrations and on reproductive organ development in beef heifer calves.

Authors:  Alan K Kelly; Colin Byrne; Mark McGee; George A Perry; Mark A Crowe; Helga Sauerwein; David A Kenny
Journal:  J Anim Sci       Date:  2020-10-01       Impact factor: 3.159

9.  Production performance of cows raised with different postweaning growth patterns.

Authors:  Harvey C Freetly; Robert A Cushman; Gary L Bennett
Journal:  Transl Anim Sci       Date:  2021-02-16

10.  A high plane of nutrition during early life alters the hypothalamic transcriptome of heifer calves.

Authors:  José M Sánchez; Kate Keogh; Alan K Kelly; Colin J Byrne; Pat Lonergan; David A Kenny
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2021-07-07       Impact factor: 4.379

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.