Literature DB >> 19464859

Student learning preferences and the impact of a multimedia learning tool in the dissection course at the University of Munich.

Christopher Adamczyk1, Matthias Holzer, Reinhard Putz, Martin R Fischer.   

Abstract

How do students use multimedia tools to support their learning during a gross anatomy dissection course? We investigated this question in the anatomic dissection course for first year medical students at the University of Munich (n=850) by giving all participating students access to an anatomical multimedia CD-ROM. The use of this multimedia learning tool was voluntary and it was not essential for the end-of-course examination. After the examination, two questionnaires (return rate first questionnaire n(1)=347, approximately 41%; return rate second questionnaire n(2)=644, approximately 76%) were given to the surveyed students with the following content: evaluation of the multimedia learning tool, details about the usage of different kinds of available learning media, and finally an evaluation of the media used for teaching during the course. Furthermore we collected personal data from participants such as age, gender and the score achieved in the examination. Classical textbooks and anatomical atlases were used by 84% of students for preparation. The multimedia learning tool was used by 34% as an additional media for learning. The multimedia learning tool was not used alone. The data showed differences with regard to gender and performance of students, but not relating to age. Students rated the computer-specific features, e.g. three-dimensional (3D) models, virtual simulations, and an interactive quiz module, as major reasons for using the multimedia learning tool. Our results show that medical students use anatomic multimedia learning tools primarily as an additional medium for learning, and thus lead to the conclusion that the main learning media are still textbooks and anatomic atlases.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19464859     DOI: 10.1016/j.aanat.2009.03.003

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Ann Anat        ISSN: 0940-9602            Impact factor:   2.698


  7 in total

1.  Defining the next generation journal: The NLM-Elsevier interactive publications experiment.

Authors:  Elliot R Siegel; Donald A B Lindberg; Glen P Campbell; William G Harless; C Rory Goodwin
Journal:  Inf Serv Use       Date:  2010-01-01

2.  The Use of Anatomical Dissection Videos in Medical Education.

Authors:  Sarah J Greene
Journal:  Anat Sci Educ       Date:  2019-03-12       Impact factor: 5.958

3.  Evaluating the Efficacy and Optimisation of the Peer-Led Flipped Model Using TEL Resources Within Neuroanatomy.

Authors:  Deepika Anbu; Alistair Robson; Octavia Kurn; Charles Taylor; Oliver Dean; December Payne; Eva Nagy; Charlotte Harrison; Samuel Hall; Scott Border
Journal:  Adv Exp Med Biol       Date:  2021       Impact factor: 2.622

4.  Medical Students' Perspective - Students' Perceptions and Attitudes After Exposure to Three Different Instructional Strategies in Applied Anatomy [Letter].

Authors:  Daniel George; Rosemary E Clarke
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-07-15

Review 5.  Gender differences in the learning and teaching of surgery: a literature review.

Authors:  Carmen M Burgos; Anna Josephson
Journal:  Int J Med Educ       Date:  2014-06-15

6.  Students' Perceptions and Attitudes After Exposure to Three Different Instructional Strategies in Applied Anatomy.

Authors:  Khalid A Bin Abdulrahman; Mohammad I Jumaa; Safaa M Hanafy; Eman A Elkordy; Mostafa A Arafa; Tauseef Ahmad; Shahzad Rasheed
Journal:  Adv Med Educ Pract       Date:  2021-06-04

7.  Development of a Three-Dimensional Hand Model Using Three-Dimensional Stereophotogrammetry: Assessment of Image Reproducibility.

Authors:  Inge A Hoevenaren; J Meulstee; E Krikken; S J Bergé; D J O Ulrich; Thomas J J Maal
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.