Literature DB >> 19464781

Objectification, standardization, and commodification in health care: a conceptual readjustment.

Stefan Timmermans1, Rene Almeling.   

Abstract

Historically, medical sociologists have used the interrelated concepts of objectification, commodification, and standardization to point to the pathologies of modern medicine, such as the depersonalization of care and the effects of bureaucratic control. More recent work in science studies, economic sociology, and sociology of health and illness, however, has begun to explore how the social processes of objectification, commodification, and standardization produce a wide variety of biomedical achievements. We provide a theoretical synthesis of this emerging body of scholarship centered upon the intended and unintended consequences of objectification, commodification, and standardization to improve health. We then outline a research agenda that would result from a more comprehensive assessment of how these processes manifest themselves in clinical care.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19464781     DOI: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2009.04.020

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Soc Sci Med        ISSN: 0277-9536            Impact factor:   4.634


  14 in total

1.  Parsing the peanut panic: the social life of a contested food allergy epidemic.

Authors:  Miranda R Waggoner
Journal:  Soc Sci Med       Date:  2013-05-06       Impact factor: 4.634

2.  Legitimizing Continuous Quality Improvement (CQI): Navigating Rationality in Undergraduate Medical Education.

Authors:  Terry D Stratton
Journal:  J Gen Intern Med       Date:  2019-05       Impact factor: 5.128

3.  Should I stay or should I go? The impact of working time and wages on retention in the health workforce.

Authors:  Stephanie Steinmetz; Daniel H de Vries; Kea G Tijdens
Journal:  Hum Resour Health       Date:  2014-04-23

4.  Research protocol: a realist synthesis of contestability in community-based mental health markets.

Authors:  Jo Durham; Amara Bains
Journal:  Syst Rev       Date:  2015-03-25

5.  (Re) Making the Procrustean Bed? Standardization and Customization as Competing Logics in Healthcare.

Authors:  Russell Mannion; Mark Exworthy
Journal:  Int J Health Policy Manag       Date:  2017-06-01

6.  Critical race theory as a tool for understanding poor engagement along the HIV care continuum among African American/Black and Hispanic persons living with HIV in the United States: a qualitative exploration.

Authors:  Robert Freeman; Marya Viorst Gwadz; Elizabeth Silverman; Alexandra Kutnick; Noelle R Leonard; Amanda S Ritchie; Jennifer Reed; Belkis Y Martinez
Journal:  Int J Equity Health       Date:  2017-03-24

7.  How embedded is public involvement in mainstream health research in England a decade after policy implementation? A realist evaluation.

Authors:  Patricia Wilson; Elspeth Mathie; Fiona Poland; Julia Keenan; Amanda Howe; Diane Munday; Sally Kendall; Marion Cowe; Sophie Staniszewska; Claire Goodman
Journal:  J Health Serv Res Policy       Date:  2018-04

8.  eHealth and telemedicine: Practices and beliefs among healthcare professionals and medical students at a medical university.

Authors:  Anna Wernhart; Susanne Gahbauer; Daniela Haluza
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-02-28       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Coping with uncertainty during healthcare-seeking in Lao PDR.

Authors:  Helle M Alvesson; Magnus Lindelow; Bouasavanh Khanthaphat; Lucie Laflamme
Journal:  BMC Int Health Hum Rights       Date:  2013-06-19

10.  Challenges in making standardisation work in healthcare: lessons from a qualitative interview study of a line-labelling policy in a UK region.

Authors:  Natasha Marie Kriznik; Guillaume Lamé; Mary Dixon-Woods
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2019-11-27       Impact factor: 2.692

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.