Literature DB >> 19464743

Hypothetical bias, cheap talk, and stated willingness to pay for health care.

Semra Ozdemir1, F Reed Johnson, A Brett Hauber.   

Abstract

Subjects with rheumatoid arthritis (RA) enrolled in an online panel were asked to evaluate pairs of treatment alternatives with different attributes. Half of the sample saw a cheap-talk text. Preference parameters were estimated using random-parameters logit models to account for unobserved taste heterogeneity. The models also were estimated in willingness-to-pay (WTP) space instead of conventional utility space. Cheap talk not only affected the coefficient on the cost attribute, but also preferences for other attributes. WTP estimates were generally lower in cheap talk sample, except for the most important attribute and a 2-level attribute. Subjects who were presented with cheap talk discriminated between the adjoning attribute levels better than the subjects in the control sample.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19464743     DOI: 10.1016/j.jhealeco.2009.04.004

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Econ        ISSN: 0167-6296            Impact factor:   3.883


  26 in total

Review 1.  How important is mode of administration in treatments for rheumatic diseases and related conditions?

Authors:  Nick Bansback; Logan Trenaman; Mark Harrison
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 4.592

2.  Improving the Validity of Stated-Preference Data in Health Research: The Potential of the Time-to-Think Approach.

Authors:  Semra Ozdemir
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2015-06       Impact factor: 3.883

3.  How does cost matter in health-care discrete-choice experiments?

Authors:  F Reed Johnson; Ateesha F Mohamed; Semra Ozdemir; Deborah A Marshall; Kathryn A Phillips
Journal:  Health Econ       Date:  2011-03       Impact factor: 3.046

4.  Demand for Precision Medicine: A Discrete-Choice Experiment and External Validation Study.

Authors:  Dean A Regier; David L Veenstra; Anirban Basu; Josh J Carlson
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2020-01       Impact factor: 4.981

5.  Accounting for Scale Heterogeneity in Healthcare-Related Discrete Choice Experiments when Comparing Stated Preferences: A Systematic Review.

Authors:  Stuart J Wright; Caroline M Vass; Gene Sim; Michael Burton; Denzil G Fiebig; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Patient       Date:  2018-10       Impact factor: 3.883

6.  Stubbing out hypothetical bias: improving tobacco market predictions by combining stated and revealed preference data.

Authors:  John Buckell; Stephane Hess
Journal:  J Health Econ       Date:  2019-04-02       Impact factor: 3.883

Review 7.  Discrete choice experiments in health economics: a review of the literature.

Authors:  Michael D Clark; Domino Determann; Stavros Petrou; Domenico Moro; Esther W de Bekker-Grob
Journal:  Pharmacoeconomics       Date:  2014-09       Impact factor: 4.981

Review 8.  Economics of stratified medicine in rheumatoid arthritis.

Authors:  Sean Gavan; Mark Harrison; Cynthia Iglesias; Anne Barton; Andrea Manca; Katherine Payne
Journal:  Curr Rheumatol Rep       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.592

9.  Patient Preferences for Treating "OFF" Episodes in Parkinson's Disease: A Discrete Choice Experiment.

Authors:  Andrew Thach; Jessie Sutphin; Joshua Coulter; Colton Leach; Eric Pappert; Carol Mansfield
Journal:  Patient Prefer Adherence       Date:  2021-06-01       Impact factor: 2.711

10.  Effectiveness of initial methotrexate-based treatment approaches in early rheumatoid arthritis: an elicitation of rheumatologists' beliefs.

Authors:  Gyanendra Pokharel; Rob Deardon; Sindhu R Johnson; George Tomlinson; Pauline M Hull; Glen S Hazlewood
Journal:  Rheumatology (Oxford)       Date:  2021-08-02       Impact factor: 7.580

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.