Literature DB >> 19464460

Characterization and outcome of patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement.

Samir R Kapadia1, Sachin S Goel, Lars Svensson, Eric Roselli, Robert M Savage, Lee Wallace, Srikanth Sola, Paul Schoenhagen, Mehdi H Shishehbor, Ryan Christofferson, Carmel Halley, L Leonardo Rodriguez, William Stewart, Vidyasagar Kalahasti, E Murat Tuzcu.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: Many high-risk patients with severe symptomatic aortic stenosis are not referred for surgical aortic valve replacement. Although this patient population remains ill-defined, many of these patients are now being referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. We sought to define the characteristics and outcomes of patients referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement.
METHODS: Between February 2006 and March 2007, 92 patients were screened for percutaneous aortic valve replacement. Clinical and echocardiographic characteristics of patients undergoing surgical aortic valve replacement, percutaneous aortic valve replacement, balloon aortic valvuloplasty, or no intervention were compared. The primary end point was all-cause mortality.
RESULTS: Nineteen patients underwent successful surgical aortic valve replacement, 18 patients underwent percutaneous aortic valve replacement, and 36 patients had no intervention. Thirty patients underwent balloon aortic valvuloplasty, and of these, 8 patients were bridged to percutaneous aortic valve replacement and 3 were bridged to surgical aortic valve replacement. Of the remaining 19 patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty, bridging to percutaneous aortic valve replacement could not be accomplished because of death (n = 9 [47%)], exclusion from the percutaneous aortic valve replacement protocol (n = 6 [32%]), and some patients improved after balloon aortic valvuloplasty and declined percutaneous aortic valve replacement (n = 4 [21%]). The most common reasons for no intervention included death while awaiting definitive treatment (n = 10 [28%]), patient uninterested in percutaneous aortic valve replacement (n = 10 [28%]), and questionable severity of symptoms or aortic stenosis (n = 9 [25%]). Patients not undergoing aortic valve replacement had higher mortality compared with those undergoing aortic valve replacement (44% vs 14%) over a mean duration of 220 days.
CONCLUSION: Symptomatic patients with severe aortic stenosis have high mortality if timely aortic valve replacement is not feasible. Twenty percent of the patients referred for percutaneous aortic valve replacement underwent surgical aortic valve replacement with good outcome. Patients undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty alone or no intervention had unfavorable outcomes.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19464460     DOI: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.12.030

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg        ISSN: 0022-5223            Impact factor:   5.209


  12 in total

Review 1.  Transcatheter aortic valve implantation: evidence on safety and efficacy compared with medical therapy. A systematic review of current literature.

Authors:  L Figulla; A Neumann; H R Figulla; P Kahlert; R Erbel; T Neumann
Journal:  Clin Res Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-17       Impact factor: 5.460

2.  Minimally invasive aortic valve surgery: Cleveland Clinic experience.

Authors:  Douglas R Johnston; Eric E Roselli
Journal:  Ann Cardiothorac Surg       Date:  2015-03

Review 3.  In vivo imaging and computational analysis of the aortic root. Application in clinical research and design of transcatheter aortic valve systems.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Alexander Hill; Tim Kelley; Zoran Popovic; Sandra S Halliburton
Journal:  J Cardiovasc Transl Res       Date:  2011-04-12       Impact factor: 4.132

Review 4.  Transcatheter heart-valve replacement: update.

Authors:  Michael W A Chu; Michael A Borger; Friedrich W Mohr; Thomas Walther
Journal:  CMAJ       Date:  2010-03-08       Impact factor: 8.262

Review 5.  Advanced 3-D analysis, client-server systems, and cloud computing-Integration of cardiovascular imaging data into clinical workflows of transcatheter aortic valve replacement.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Mathis Zimmermann; Juergen Falkner
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2013-06

Review 6.  Computed tomography in the evaluation for transcatheter aortic valve implantation (TAVI).

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Jörg Hausleiter; Stephan Achenbach; Milind Y Desai; E Murat Tuzcu
Journal:  Cardiovasc Diagn Ther       Date:  2011-12

Review 7.  Transcatheter aortic valve repair, imaging, and electronic imaging health record.

Authors:  Paul Schoenhagen; Juergen Falkner; David Piraino
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rep       Date:  2013-01       Impact factor: 2.931

8.  Contrast volume reduction using third generation dual source computed tomography for the evaluation of patients prior to transcatheter aortic valve implantation.

Authors:  Daniel O Bittner; Martin Arnold; Lutz Klinghammer; Annika Schuhbaeck; Michaela M Hell; Gerd Muschiol; Soeren Gauss; Michael Lell; Michael Uder; Udo Hoffmann; Stephan Achenbach; Mohamed Marwan
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-03-19       Impact factor: 5.315

9.  Patients with small left ventricular size undergoing balloon aortic valvuloplasty have worse intraprocedural outcomes.

Authors:  Creighton Don; Pritha P Gupta; Christian Witzke; Manoj Kesarwani; Roberto J Cubeddu; Ignacio Inglessis; Igor F Palacios
Journal:  Catheter Cardiovasc Interv       Date:  2012-08-23       Impact factor: 2.692

Review 10.  Causes of Death Following Transcatheter Aortic Valve Replacement: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis.

Authors:  Tian-Yuan Xiong; Yan-Biao Liao; Zhen-Gang Zhao; Yuan-Ning Xu; Xin Wei; Zhi-Liang Zuo; Yi-Jian Li; Jia-Yu Cao; Hong Tang; Hasan Jilaihawi; Yuan Feng; Mao Chen
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2015-09-21       Impact factor: 5.501

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.