OBJECTIVES: It was hypothesized that the coronal cementum containing collagen forms a weak junction with enamel unlike the well integrated DEJ and CDJ. METHODS: The hypothesis was investigated in two parts: (1) evaluate the structure, chemical composition and mechanical properties of coronal cementum and its junction with enamel using scanning electron microscopy, micro-X-ray computed tomography, and atomic force microscopy. The chemical composition and mechanical properties were determined by evaluating the spatial variations of inorganic (PO(4)(3-)nu(1) mode at 960 cm(-1)) and organic (C-H deformation at 1452 cm(-1); C-H stretch at 2940 cm(-1)) contents using Raman microspectroscopy and elastic modulus and hardness values using nanoindentation. (2) Estimate the strength and evaluate the microstructure of coronal cementum interface with enamel using SEM and MicroXCT. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Coronal cementum is heterogeneous because it is a combination of laminar acellular afibrillar cementum and acellular extrinsic fiber cementum with relatively higher organic content. It integrates micromechanically via a scallop-like weak interface with enamel unlike the biomechanically efficient DEJ and CDJ and is continuous with primary root cementum. A single tooth could exhibit all three types of cementum enamel junctions; an overlap, butt and a gap depending on the sectioning plane. The elastic modulus of coronal cementum (11.0+/-5.8 GPa) is significantly lower (p<0.05; Student's t-test with 95% confidence interval) than primary cementum (15.8+/-5.3 GPa).
OBJECTIVES: It was hypothesized that the coronal cementum containing collagen forms a weak junction with enamel unlike the well integrated DEJ and CDJ. METHODS: The hypothesis was investigated in two parts: (1) evaluate the structure, chemical composition and mechanical properties of coronal cementum and its junction with enamel using scanning electron microscopy, micro-X-ray computed tomography, and atomic force microscopy. The chemical composition and mechanical properties were determined by evaluating the spatial variations of inorganic (PO(4)(3-)nu(1) mode at 960 cm(-1)) and organic (C-H deformation at 1452 cm(-1); C-H stretch at 2940 cm(-1)) contents using Raman microspectroscopy and elastic modulus and hardness values using nanoindentation. (2) Estimate the strength and evaluate the microstructure of coronal cementum interface with enamel using SEM and MicroXCT. RESULTS AND CONCLUSIONS: Coronal cementum is heterogeneous because it is a combination of laminar acellular afibrillar cementum and acellular extrinsic fiber cementum with relatively higher organic content. It integrates micromechanically via a scallop-like weak interface with enamel unlike the biomechanically efficient DEJ and CDJ and is continuous with primary root cementum. A single tooth could exhibit all three types of cementum enamel junctions; an overlap, butt and a gap depending on the sectioning plane. The elastic modulus of coronal cementum (11.0+/-5.8 GPa) is significantly lower (p<0.05; Student's t-test with 95% confidence interval) than primary cementum (15.8+/-5.3 GPa).
Authors: Sunita P Ho; Bo Yu; Wenbing Yun; Grayson W Marshall; Mark I Ryder; Sally J Marshall Journal: Acta Biomater Date: 2008-09-09 Impact factor: 8.947
Authors: Jeremy D Lin; Andrew T Jang; Michael P Kurylo; Jonathan Hurng; Feifei Yang; Lynn Yang; Arvin Pal; Ling Chen; Sunita P Ho Journal: Dent Mater Date: 2017-05-02 Impact factor: 5.304
Authors: Andrew T Jang; Jeremy D Lin; Ryan M Choi; Erin M Choi; Melanie L Seto; Mark I Ryder; Stuart A Gansky; Donald A Curtis; Sunita P Ho Journal: J Mech Behav Biomed Mater Date: 2014-07-24
Authors: Michael P Kurylo; Kathryn Grandfield; Grayson W Marshall; Virginia Altoe; Shaul Aloni; Sunita P Ho Journal: Arch Oral Biol Date: 2015-12-03 Impact factor: 2.633
Authors: Sunita P Ho; Michael P Kurylo; Kathryn Grandfield; Jonathan Hurng; Ralf-Peter Herber; Mark I Ryder; Virginia Altoe; Shaul Aloni; Jian Q Feng; Samuel Webb; Grayson W Marshall; Donald Curtis; Joy C Andrews; Piero Pianetta Journal: Bone Date: 2013-09-21 Impact factor: 4.398
Authors: Narita L Leong; Jonathan M Hurng; Sabra I Djomehri; Stuart A Gansky; Mark I Ryder; Sunita P Ho Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-04-30 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Sabra I Djomehri; Susan Candell; Thomas Case; Alyssa Browning; Grayson W Marshall; Wenbing Yun; S H Lau; Samuel Webb; Sunita P Ho Journal: PLoS One Date: 2015-04-09 Impact factor: 3.240