Literature DB >> 19464012

Subject-specific hip geometry and hip joint centre location affects calculated contact forces at the hip during gait.

G Lenaerts1, W Bartels, F Gelaude, M Mulier, A Spaepen, G Van der Perre, I Jonkers.   

Abstract

Hip loading affects the development of hip osteoarthritis, bone remodelling and osseointegration of implants. In this study, we analyzed the effect of subject-specific modelling of hip geometry and hip joint centre (HJC) location on the quantification of hip joint moments, muscle moments and hip contact forces during gait, using musculoskeletal modelling, inverse dynamic analysis and static optimization. For 10 subjects, hip joint moments, muscle moments and hip loading in terms of magnitude and orientation were quantified using three different model types, each including a different amount of subject-specific detail: (1) a generic scaled musculoskeletal model, (2) a generic scaled musculoskeletal model with subject-specific hip geometry (femoral anteversion, neck-length and neck-shaft angle) and (3) a generic scaled musculoskeletal model with subject-specific hip geometry including HJC location. Subject-specific geometry and HJC location were derived from CT. Significant differences were found between the three model types in HJC location, hip flexion-extension moment and inclination angle of the total contact force in the frontal plane. No model agreement was found between the three model types for the calculation of contact forces in terms of magnitude and orientations, and muscle moments. Therefore, we suggest that personalized models with individualized hip joint geometry and HJC location should be used for the quantification of hip loading. For biomechanical analyses aiming to understand modified hip joint loading, and planning hip surgery in patients with osteoarthritis, the amount of subject-specific detail, related to bone geometry and joint centre location in the musculoskeletal models used, needs to be considered.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19464012     DOI: 10.1016/j.jbiomech.2009.03.037

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Biomech        ISSN: 0021-9290            Impact factor:   2.712


  16 in total

Review 1.  Role of bone architecture and anatomy in osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Julie C Baker-LePain; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Bone       Date:  2012-01-24       Impact factor: 4.398

2.  Is my model good enough? Best practices for verification and validation of musculoskeletal models and simulations of movement.

Authors:  Jennifer L Hicks; Thomas K Uchida; Ajay Seth; Apoorva Rajagopal; Scott L Delp
Journal:  J Biomech Eng       Date:  2015-01-26       Impact factor: 2.097

3.  Hip joint center localisation: A biomechanical application to hip arthroplasty population.

Authors:  Vicky Bouffard; Mickael Begon; Annick Champagne; Payam Farhadnia; Pascal-André Vendittoli; Martin Lavigne; François Prince
Journal:  World J Orthop       Date:  2012-08-18

Review 4.  Methodological factors affecting joint moments estimation in clinical gait analysis: a systematic review.

Authors:  Valentina Camomilla; Andrea Cereatti; Andrea Giovanni Cutti; Silvia Fantozzi; Rita Stagni; Giuseppe Vannozzi
Journal:  Biomed Eng Online       Date:  2017-08-18       Impact factor: 2.819

5.  Variant alleles of the Wnt antagonist FRZB are determinants of hip shape and modify the relationship between hip shape and osteoarthritis.

Authors:  Julie C Baker-Lepain; John A Lynch; Neeta Parimi; Charles E McCulloch; Michael C Nevitt; Maripat Corr; Nancy E Lane
Journal:  Arthritis Rheum       Date:  2012-05

6.  In-vivo quantification of dynamic hip joint center errors and soft tissue artifact.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Penny R Atkins; Michael J Kutschke; K Bo Foreman; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Gait Posture       Date:  2016-09-11       Impact factor: 2.840

7.  Accuracy of Functional and Predictive Methods to Calculate the Hip Joint Center in Young Non-pathologic Asymptomatic Adults with Dual Fluoroscopy as a Reference Standard.

Authors:  Niccolo M Fiorentino; Michael J Kutschke; Penny R Atkins; K Bo Foreman; Ashley L Kapron; Andrew E Anderson
Journal:  Ann Biomed Eng       Date:  2015-12-08       Impact factor: 3.934

8.  Personalized neuromusculoskeletal modeling to improve treatment of mobility impairments: a perspective from European research sites.

Authors:  Benjamin J Fregly; Michael L Boninger; David J Reinkensmeyer
Journal:  J Neuroeng Rehabil       Date:  2012-03-30       Impact factor: 4.262

9.  Biomechanical factors in planning of periacetabular osteotomy.

Authors:  Noushin Niknafs; Ryan J Murphy; Robert S Armiger; Jyri Lepistö; Mehran Armand
Journal:  Front Bioeng Biotechnol       Date:  2013-12-10

10.  Are subject-specific musculoskeletal models robust to the uncertainties in parameter identification?

Authors:  Giordano Valente; Lorenzo Pitto; Debora Testi; Ajay Seth; Scott L Delp; Rita Stagni; Marco Viceconti; Fulvia Taddei
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2014-11-12       Impact factor: 3.240

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.