Literature DB >> 19463386

Temporal trends and improved outcomes of percutaneous coronary revascularization in nonagenarians.

Aaron M From1, Charanjit S Rihal, Ryan J Lennon, David R Holmes, Abhiram Prasad.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: The aim of this study was to describe the clinical characteristics and the outcomes of patients 90 years of age or older who were treated with percutaneous coronary intervention (PCI).
BACKGROUND: There is a paucity of outcomes data among nonagenarians undergoing PCI.
METHODS: We evaluated the outcomes of all patients 90 years of age or older in the Mayo Clinic PCI registry and examined trends over time.
RESULTS: Over a period of 19 years, we identified 138 nonagenarians (66% women; age 92.2 +/- 2.0 years). Mean duration of hospitalization was 3.7 +/- 3.1 days, and the median follow-up duration was 3.6 years. Ninety-one percent of patients presented with an acute coronary syndrome and underwent urgent or emergent revascularization. Technical success rate was 91%. Overall, the frequency of in-hospital death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, and major adverse cardiac events (composite of death, Q-wave myocardial infarction, urgent or emergent coronary artery bypass grafting, and cerebrovascular accident) were 9.4%, 0.7%, and 12.3%, respectively. The long-term survival of the cohort was not significantly different than that of an age, gender, and calendar year of birth-matched Minnesota cohort. The cohort was divided into 2 groups according to the time of their intervention: pre-2000 (n = 32) and 2000 to 2006 (n = 106). The in-hospital mortality decreased markedly: 22% to 6% (p = 0.006), respectively.
CONCLUSIONS: Our study demonstrates that, in carefully selected patients, PCI in contemporary practice may be performed with high technical success with relatively low mortality and morbidity. Thus, advanced age alone must not be considered a contraindication to performing coronary angiography and PCI when clear indications are present.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2008        PMID: 19463386     DOI: 10.1016/j.jcin.2008.07.009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  JACC Cardiovasc Interv        ISSN: 1936-8798            Impact factor:   11.195


  8 in total

Review 1.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in the elderly.

Authors:  Tracy Y Wang; Antonio Gutierrez; Eric D Peterson
Journal:  Nat Rev Cardiol       Date:  2010-12-07       Impact factor: 32.419

2.  Barthel Index as a Predictor of 1-Year Mortality in Very Elderly Patients Who Underwent Percutaneous Coronary Intervention for Acute Coronary Syndrome: Better Activities of Daily Living, Longer Life.

Authors:  Satoshi Higuchi; Yusuke Kabeya; Kenichi Matsushita; Hiroki Taguchi; Haruhisa Ishiguro; Hideyasu Kohshoh; Hideaki Yoshino
Journal:  Clin Cardiol       Date:  2015-12-31       Impact factor: 2.882

3.  Successful percutaneous coronary intervention in a centenarian patient with acute myocardial infarction.

Authors:  Ki Hong Lee; Myung Ho Jeong; Cho Yun Chung; Donghan Kim; Min Goo Lee; Keun-Ho Park; Doo Sun Sim; Nam Sik Yoon; Hyun Ju Yoon; Kye Hun Kim; Young Joon Hong; Ju Han Kim; Youngkeun Ahn; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Jung Chaee Kang
Journal:  Korean Circ J       Date:  2012-05-24       Impact factor: 3.243

4.  Characteristics, in-hospital and long-term clinical outcomes of nonagenarian compared with octogenarian acute myocardial infarction patients.

Authors:  Ki Hong Lee; Youngkeun Ahn; Sung Soo Kim; Si Hyun Rhew; Young Wook Jeong; Soo Young Jang; Jae Yeong Cho; Hae Chang Jeong; Keun-Ho Park; Nam Sik Yoon; Doo Sun Sim; Hyun Joo Yoon; Kye Hun Kim; Young Joon Hong; Hyung Wook Park; Ju Han Kim; Jeong Gwan Cho; Jong Chun Park; Myung Ho Jeong; Myeong-Chan Cho; Chong Jin Kim; Young Jo Kim
Journal:  J Korean Med Sci       Date:  2014-04-01       Impact factor: 2.153

5.  Comparison of Outcomes After Percutaneous Coronary Intervention in Elderly Patients, Including 10 628 Nonagenarians: Insights From a Japanese Nationwide Registry (J-PCI Registry).

Authors:  Yohei Numasawa; Taku Inohara; Hideki Ishii; Kyohei Yamaji; Shun Kohsaka; Mitsuaki Sawano; Masaki Kodaira; Shiro Uemura; Kazushige Kadota; Tetsuya Amano; Masato Nakamura
Journal:  J Am Heart Assoc       Date:  2019-03-05       Impact factor: 5.501

6.  RDW Value may Increase the Diagnostic Accuracy of MPS.

Authors:  Sukru Cetin; Suleyman Sezai Yildiz; Kudret Keskin; Serhat Sigirci; Ali Bayraktar; Irfan Sahin
Journal:  Sisli Etfal Hastan Tip Bul       Date:  2021-03-17

7.  Percutaneous coronary intervention in nonagenarians: pros and cons.

Authors:  Giuseppe Biondi Zoccai; Antonio Abbate; Fabrizio D'Ascenzo; Davide Presutti; Mariangela Peruzzi; Elena Cavarretta; Antonino G M Marullo; Marzia Lotrionte; Giacomo Frati
Journal:  J Geriatr Cardiol       Date:  2013-03       Impact factor: 3.327

8.  Percutaneous Coronary Intervention Is More Beneficial Than Optimal Medical Therapy in Elderly Patients with Angina Pectoris.

Authors:  Hoyoun Won; Ae Young Her; Byeong Keuk Kim; Yong Hoon Kim; Dong Ho Shin; Jung Sun Kim; Young Guk Ko; Donghoon Choi; Hyuck Moon Kwon; Yangsoo Jang; Myeong Ki Hong
Journal:  Yonsei Med J       Date:  2016-03       Impact factor: 2.759

  8 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.