Literature DB >> 19462462

Evidence for field cancerization of the prostate.

Larisa Nonn1, Vijayalakshmi Ananthanarayanan, Peter H Gann.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: Field cancerization, which is not yet well-characterized in the prostate, occurs when large areas of an organ or tissue surface are affected by a carcinogenic insult, resulting in the development of multi-focal independent premalignant foci and molecular lesions that precede histological change.
METHODS: Herein, we review the cumulative body of evidence concerning field effects in the prostate and critically evaluate the methods available for the identification and validation of field effect biomarkers. Validated biomarkers for field effects have an important role to play as surrogate endpoint biomarkers in Phase II prevention trials and as clinical predictors of cancer in men with negative biopsies.
RESULTS: Thus far, field effects have been identified involving nuclear morphometric changes, gene expression, protein expression, gene promoter methylation, DNA damage and angiogenesis. In addition to comparing cancer-adjacent benign tissue to more distant areas or to "supernormal" tissue from cancer-free organs, investigators can use a nested case-control design for negative biopsies that offers a number of unique advantages.
CONCLUSIONS: True carcinogenic field effects should be distinguished from secondary responses of the microenvironment to a developing tumor, although the latter may still lead to useful clinical prediction tools. Prostate 69: 1470-1479, 2009. (c) 2009 Wiley-Liss, Inc.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19462462      PMCID: PMC3690597          DOI: 10.1002/pros.20983

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Prostate        ISSN: 0270-4137            Impact factor:   4.104


  59 in total

1.  A cancer DNA phenotype in healthy prostates, conserved in tumors and adjacent normal cells, implies a relationship to carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Donald C Malins; Naomi K Gilman; Virginia M Green; Thomas M Wheeler; Edward A Barker; Katie M Anderson
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2005-12-16       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  Cyclooxygenase-2 is up-regulated in proliferative inflammatory atrophy of the prostate, but not in prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  S Zha; W R Gage; J Sauvageot; E A Saria; M J Putzi; C M Ewing; D A Faith; W G Nelson; A M De Marzo; W B Isaacs
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2001-12-15       Impact factor: 12.701

3.  Telomerase activity, telomere length, and DNA ploidy in prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia (PIN).

Authors:  K S Koeneman; C X Pan; J K Jin; J M Pyle; R C Flanigan; T V Shankey; M O Diaz
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  1998-10       Impact factor: 7.450

4.  Subtle changes in benign tissue adjacent to prostate neoplasia detected with a Bayesian belief network.

Authors:  R Montironi; L Diamanti; R Pomante; D Thompson; P H Bartels
Journal:  J Pathol       Date:  1997-08       Impact factor: 7.996

5.  Detection of prostate cancer with a blood-based assay for early prostate cancer antigen.

Authors:  Barbara Paul; Rajiv Dhir; Douglas Landsittel; Moira R Hitchens; Robert H Getzenberg
Journal:  Cancer Res       Date:  2005-05-15       Impact factor: 12.701

6.  Epigenetic heterogeneity of high-grade prostatic intraepithelial neoplasia: clues for clonal progression in prostate carcinogenesis.

Authors:  Rui Henrique; Carmen Jerónimo; Manuel R Teixeira; Mohammad O Hoque; André L Carvalho; Irene Pais; Franclim R Ribeiro; Jorge Oliveira; Carlos Lopes; David Sidransky
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2006-01       Impact factor: 5.852

7.  Mapping of TMPRSS2-ERG fusions in the context of multi-focal prostate cancer.

Authors:  Bungo Furusato; Chun-Ling Gao; Lakshmi Ravindranath; Yongmei Chen; Jennifer Cullen; David G McLeod; Albert Dobi; Shiv Srivastava; Gyorgy Petrovics; Isabell A Sesterhenn
Journal:  Mod Pathol       Date:  2007-12-07       Impact factor: 7.842

8.  Cyclooxygenase-2 (COX-2) expression is an independent predictor of prostate cancer recurrence.

Authors:  Brian L Cohen; Pablo Gomez; Yohei Omori; Robert C Duncan; Francisco Civantos; Mark S Soloway; Vinata B Lokeshwar; Bal L Lokeshwar
Journal:  Int J Cancer       Date:  2006-09-01       Impact factor: 7.396

9.  Topography of neovascularity in human prostate carcinoma.

Authors:  J A Siegal; E Yu; M K Brawer
Journal:  Cancer       Date:  1995-05-15       Impact factor: 6.860

10.  RASSF1A promoter methylation is frequently detected in both pre-malignant and non-malignant microdissected prostatic epithelial tissues.

Authors:  Alan Aitchison; Anne Warren; David Neal; Pamela Rabbitts
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2007-05-01       Impact factor: 4.104

View more
  77 in total

1.  Risk factors for prostate cancer detection after a negative biopsy: a novel multivariable longitudinal approach.

Authors:  Peter H Gann; Angela Fought; Ryan Deaton; William J Catalona; Edward Vonesh
Journal:  J Clin Oncol       Date:  2010-02-22       Impact factor: 44.544

2.  Differential expression of peroxiredoxins in prostate cancer: consistent upregulation of PRDX3 and PRDX4.

Authors:  Anamika Basu; Hiya Banerjee; Heather Rojas; Shannalee R Martinez; Sourav Roy; Zhenyu Jia; Michael B Lilly; Marino De León; Carlos A Casiano
Journal:  Prostate       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 4.104

Review 3.  Precancer in ulcerative colitis: the role of the field effect and its clinical implications.

Authors:  Kathryn T Baker; Jesse J Salk; Teresa A Brentnall; Rosa Ana Risques
Journal:  Carcinogenesis       Date:  2018-01-12       Impact factor: 4.944

4.  ID4 is frequently downregulated and partially hypermethylated in prostate cancer.

Authors:  Anna Vinarskaja; Wolfgang Goering; Marc Ingenwerth; Wolfgang A Schulz
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2011-09-01       Impact factor: 4.226

5.  Molecular Characterization of Prostate Cancer with Associated Gleason Score Using Mass Spectrometry Imaging.

Authors:  Elizabeth C Randall; Giorgia Zadra; Paolo Chetta; Begona G C Lopez; Sudeepa Syamala; Sankha S Basu; Jeffrey N Agar; Massimo Loda; Clare M Tempany; Fiona M Fennessy; Nathalie Y R Agar
Journal:  Mol Cancer Res       Date:  2019-02-11       Impact factor: 5.852

Review 6.  An evolutionary perspective on field cancerization.

Authors:  Kit Curtius; Nicholas A Wright; Trevor A Graham
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2017-12-08       Impact factor: 60.716

7.  Cancer-associated changes in the expression of TMPRSS2-ERG, PCA3, and SPINK1 in histologically benign tissue from cancerous vs noncancerous prostatectomy specimens.

Authors:  Riina-Minna Väänänen; Hans Lilja; Leni Kauko; Pauliina Helo; Henna Kekki; Angel M Cronin; Andrew J Vickers; Martti Nurmi; Kalle Alanen; Anders Bjartell; Kim Pettersson
Journal:  Urology       Date:  2014-02       Impact factor: 2.649

8.  Stromal PDGFRbeta expression in prostate tumors and non-malignant prostate tissue predicts prostate cancer survival.

Authors:  Christina Hägglöf; Peter Hammarsten; Andreas Josefsson; Pär Stattin; Janna Paulsson; Anders Bergh; Arne Ostman
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2010-05-20       Impact factor: 3.240

9.  Using the epigenetic field defect to detect prostate cancer in biopsy negative patients.

Authors:  Matthew Truong; Bing Yang; Andrew Livermore; Jennifer Wagner; Puspha Weeratunga; Wei Huang; Rajiv Dhir; Joel Nelson; Daniel W Lin; David F Jarrard
Journal:  J Urol       Date:  2012-11-15       Impact factor: 7.450

Review 10.  Targeting minimal residual disease: a path to cure?

Authors:  Marlise R Luskin; Mark A Murakami; Scott R Manalis; David M Weinstock
Journal:  Nat Rev Cancer       Date:  2018-01-29       Impact factor: 60.716

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.