| Literature DB >> 19461974 |
Abstract
The ATP binding cassette containing transporters are a superfamily of integral membrane proteins that translocate a wide range of substrates. The subfamily B members include the biologically important multidrug resistant (MDR) protein and the transporter associated with antigen processing (TAP) complex. Substrates translocated by this subfamily include drugs, lipids, peptides and iron. We have constructed a comprehensive set of comparative models for the transporters from eukaryotes and used these to study the effects of sequence divergence on the substrate translocation pathway. Notably, there is very little structural divergence between the bacterial template structure and the more distantly related eukaryotic proteins illustrating a need to conserve transporter structure. By contrast different properties have been adopted for the translocation pathway depending on the substrate type. A greater level of divergence in electrostatic properties is seen with transporters that have a broad substrate range both within and between species, while a high level of conservation is observed when the substrate range is narrow. This study represents the first effort towards understanding effect of evolution on subfamily B ABC transporters in the context of protein structure and biophysical properties.Entities:
Keywords: ABC transporter; comparative modelling; electrostatic potential; structure
Year: 2007 PMID: 19461974 PMCID: PMC2684127
Source DB: PubMed Journal: Evol Bioinform Online ISSN: 1176-9343 Impact factor: 1.625
Distribution of ABC subfamily B members based on classification by Homologene.
| Homo sapiens | F | - | H | H | F | H | H | H | H | H | H | F |
| Pan troglodytes | F | - | H | - | F | H | H | - | H | H | - | F |
| Canis familiaris | F | - | H | - | H | H | H | H | H | - | F | |
| Mus musculus | F | F | H | H | F | H | H | H | H | H | H | F |
| Rattus norvegicus | F | F | H | H | F | H | H | H | H | H | H | - |
| Gallus gallus | F | - | - | - | F | - | H | H | - | H | H | - |
| Drosophila melanogaster | F | F | - | - | F | - | H | H | H | - | H | - |
| Caenorhabditis elegans | F | F | - | - | F | - | H | H | H | H | H | - |
| Oryza sativa (japonica cultivar-group) | F | F | - | - | F | - | - | - | - | - | H | F |
| Arabidopsis thaliana | F | F | - | - | F | H | - | H | - | - | H | F |
| Anopheles gambiae | F | - | - | - | - | - | H | H | - | - | H | - |
| Magnaporthe grisea 70–15 | F | - | - | - | - | - | H | H | - | - | - | - |
| Schizosaccharomyces pombe 972h | F | - | - | - | - | - | H | H | - | - | H | - |
| Saccharomyces cerevisiae | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | H | - | - | H | - |
| Kluyveromyces lactis | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | H | - | - | H | - |
| Ashbya gossypii ATCC10895 | - | - | - | - | - | - | - | H | - | - | H | - |
| Plasmodium falciparum 3D7 | - | - | - | - | - | - | H | - | - | - | - | - |
| Neurospora crassa OR74A | - | - | - | - | - | - | H | H | - | - | - | - |
Abbreviations: F: Full transporter; H: Half transporter; -: no homolog.
Classification of human ABC subfamily B transporters, including alias, transporter architecture and substrate specificities.
| ABCB1 | PGY1, MDR | F | Drug |
| ABCB2 | TAP1 | H | Peptide (ER) |
| ABCB3 | TAP2 | H | Peptide (ER) |
| ABCB4 | PGY3 | F | PC |
| ABCB5 | H | Drug | |
| ABCB6 | MTABC3 | H | Fe (OM) |
| ABCB7 | ABC7 | H | Fe/S cluster (IM) |
| ABCB8 | M-ABC1 | H | Peptide (IM) |
| ABCB9 | TAPL | H | Peptide (LY) |
| ABCB10 | M-ABC2 | H | Peptide (IM) |
| ABCB11 | SPGP | F | Bile salt |
Abbreviations: F: Full transporter; H: Half transporter; OM: outer mitochondrial membrane; IM: inner mitochondrial membrane; LY: lysosome.
Figure 1.Unrooted phylogenetic tree of transporter proteins in the ABC B subfamily. Biological processes have been associated with lineages based on the clustering of proteins with characterised proteins within them. The biological functions represented include drug/lipid/bile salt (cluster I, yellow), peptide (cluster II, magenta) and iron (cluster III, green) transport. For clarity, overlapping labels from close homologous sequences were omitted.
Figure 2.Comparative summary of electrostatic surfaces for the translocation pathway of representative transporters from human juxtaposed with examples from fly (D. melanogaster) and plant (A. thaliana). The panels are cut away views illustrating part of the surface of the translocation pathway formed by the interface of two half transporter units. Electrostatic potentials from −10 to +10 kT are displayed on the surface; red represents areas of negative electrostatic potential and blue areas represent positive electrostatic potential.