PURPOSE: Adult physical performance is recognized as a marker of both current physical capacity and future health. The aim of the study was to examine the independent influences of birth weight, infant weight gain, and infant motor development on a variety of adult physical performance outcomes, in terms of muscular strength, muscular endurance, and aerobic fitness. METHODS: The study population consisted of 4304 individuals from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC 1966) with anthropometry measured at birth and at 1 yr. Infant motor development at age 1 yr was assessed by parentally reported age at first walking supported and standing unaided. At follow-up, aged 31 yr, muscle strength was measured using a handgrip dynamometer, muscle endurance was measured using a timed trunk extension test, and aerobic fitness was estimated from heart rate immediately after a standardized step test. RESULTS: Birth weight was positively associated with muscle strength and aerobic fitness at age 31 yr, and these associations were independent of adult body size (P < 0.001). Greater infant weight gain between 0 and 1 yr was associated with lower muscle endurance (P = 0.004) and poorer aerobic fitness (P = 0.002); these associations seemed to be mediated by adult body size. Independent of infant birth weight and adult body size (height and weight), earlier infant motor development was associated with greater adult muscle strength (P < or = 0.001), muscle endurance (P < 0.001), and aerobic fitness (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher birth weight, lower infant weight gain, and earlier infant motor development independently predict higher levels of adult physical performance for muscle strength, muscle endurance, and aerobic fitness at age 31 yr.
PURPOSE: Adult physical performance is recognized as a marker of both current physical capacity and future health. The aim of the study was to examine the independent influences of birth weight, infantweight gain, and infant motor development on a variety of adult physical performance outcomes, in terms of muscular strength, muscular endurance, and aerobic fitness. METHODS: The study population consisted of 4304 individuals from the Northern Finland Birth Cohort 1966 (NFBC 1966) with anthropometry measured at birth and at 1 yr. Infant motor development at age 1 yr was assessed by parentally reported age at first walking supported and standing unaided. At follow-up, aged 31 yr, muscle strength was measured using a handgrip dynamometer, muscle endurance was measured using a timed trunk extension test, and aerobic fitness was estimated from heart rate immediately after a standardized step test. RESULTS: Birth weight was positively associated with muscle strength and aerobic fitness at age 31 yr, and these associations were independent of adult body size (P < 0.001). Greater infantweight gain between 0 and 1 yr was associated with lower muscle endurance (P = 0.004) and poorer aerobic fitness (P = 0.002); these associations seemed to be mediated by adult body size. Independent of infant birth weight and adult body size (height and weight), earlier infant motor development was associated with greater adult muscle strength (P < or = 0.001), muscle endurance (P < 0.001), and aerobic fitness (P < 0.001). CONCLUSIONS: Higher birth weight, lower infantweight gain, and earlier infant motor development independently predict higher levels of adult physical performance for muscle strength, muscle endurance, and aerobic fitness at age 31 yr.
Authors: Sari Aaltonen; Antti Latvala; Richard J Rose; Lea Pulkkinen; Urho M Kujala; Jaakko Kaprio; Karri Silventoinen Journal: Med Sci Sports Exerc Date: 2015-10 Impact factor: 5.411
Authors: Jeremy Atkinson; R Nathan Pipitone; Agnieszka Sorokowska; Piotr Sorokowski; Mara Mberira; Astrid Bartels; Gordon G Gallup Journal: PLoS One Date: 2012-08-03 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Charlotte L Ridgway; Søren Brage; Stephen J Sharp; Kirsten Corder; Kate L Westgate; Esther M van Sluijs; Ian M Goodyer; Pedro C Hallal; Sigmund A Anderssen; Luis B Sardinha; Lars Bo Andersen; Ulf Ekelund Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-12 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Kate Birnie; Rachel Cooper; Richard M Martin; Diana Kuh; Avan Aihie Sayer; Beatriz E Alvarado; Antony Bayer; Kaare Christensen; Sung-il Cho; Cyrus Cooper; Janie Corley; Leone Craig; Ian J Deary; Panayotes Demakakos; Shah Ebrahim; John Gallacher; Alan J Gow; David Gunnell; Steven Haas; Tomas Hemmingsson; Hazel Inskip; Soong-nang Jang; Kenya Noronha; Merete Osler; Alberto Palloni; Finn Rasmussen; Brigitte Santos-Eggimann; Jacques Spagnoli; John Starr; Andrew Steptoe; Holly Syddall; Per Tynelius; David Weir; Lawrence J Whalley; Maria Victoria Zunzunegui; Yoav Ben-Shlomo; Rebecca Hardy Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-01-26 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Luigi Ferrucci; Rachel Cooper; Michelle Shardell; Eleanor M Simonsick; Jennifer A Schrack; Diana Kuh Journal: J Gerontol A Biol Sci Med Sci Date: 2016-03-14 Impact factor: 6.053