Literature DB >> 19461530

Comparing the 7-day physical activity recall with a triaxial accelerometer for measuring time in exercise.

Richard Sloane1, Denise Clutter Snyder, Wendy Demark-Wahnefried, David Lobach, William E Kraus.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The primary study aim was to evaluate associations of estimated weekly minutes of moderate-to-vigorous-intensity exercise from self-reports of the telephone-administered 7-Day Physical Activity Recall (7-Day PAR) with data captured by the RT3 triaxial accelerometer.
METHODS: This investigation was undertaken as part of the FRESH START study, a randomized clinical trial that tested an iteratively tailored diet and exercise mailed print intervention among newly diagnosed breast and prostate cancer survivors. A convenience sample of 139 medically eligible subjects living within a 60-mile radius of the study center provided both 7-Day PAR and accelerometer data at enrollment. Ultimately, substudy subjects (n = 115) were found eligible for the FRESH START study and randomized to one of two study treatment arms. Follow-up assessments at year 1 (n = 103) and year 2 (n = 99) provided both the 7-Day PAR and the accelerometer data.
RESULTS: There was moderate agreement between the 7-Day PAR and the accelerometer with longitudinal serial correlation coefficients of 0.54 (baseline), 0.24 (year 1), and 0.53 (year 2), all P values <0.01, although the accelerometer estimates for weekly time in moderate-to-vigorous physical activity (PA) were much higher than those of the 7-Day PAR at all time points. The two methods were poorly correlated in assessing sensitivity to change from baseline to year 1 (rho = 0.11, P = 0.30). Using mixed models repeated-measures analysis, both methods exhibited similar nonsignificant treatment arm x time interaction P values (7-Day PAR = 0.22, accelerometer = 0.23).
CONCLUSIONS: The correlations for three serial time points were in agreement with findings of other studies that compared self-reported time in exercise with PA captured by accelerometry. However, these methods capture somewhat different dimensions of PA and provide differing estimates of change over time.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19461530      PMCID: PMC2686118          DOI: 10.1249/MSS.0b013e3181984fa8

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc        ISSN: 0195-9131            Impact factor:   5.411


  24 in total

1.  Comparisons of four methods of estimating physical activity in adult women.

Authors:  W M Sherman; H N Nagaraja
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-07       Impact factor: 5.411

2.  A comparative evaluation of three accelerometry-based physical activity monitors.

Authors:  G J Welk; S N Blair; K Wood; S Jones; R W Thompson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

3.  Validity of accelerometry for the assessment of moderate intensity physical activity in the field.

Authors:  D Hendelman; K Miller; C Baggett; E Debold; P Freedson
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

4.  Comparison of three methods for measuring the time spent in physical activity.

Authors:  B E Ainsworth; D R Bassett; S J Strath; A M Swartz; W L O'Brien; R W Thompson; D A Jones; C A Macera; C D Kimsey
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

5.  Validity of four motion sensors in measuring moderate intensity physical activity.

Authors:  D R Bassett; B E Ainsworth; A M Swartz; S J Strath; W L O'Brien; G A King
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2000-09       Impact factor: 5.411

6.  Comparison of energy expenditure estimates from doubly labeled water, a physical activity questionnaire, and physical activity records.

Authors:  Joan M Conway; James L Seale; David R Jacobs; Melinda L Irwin; Barbara E Ainsworth
Journal:  Am J Clin Nutr       Date:  2002-03       Impact factor: 7.045

7.  Design of FRESH START: a randomized trial of exercise and diet among cancer survivors.

Authors:  Wendy Demark-Wahnefried; Elizabeth C Clipp; Colleen McBride; David F Lobach; Isaac Lipkus; Bercedis Peterson; Denise Clutter Snyder; Richard Sloane; Jennifer Arbanas; William E Kraus
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-03       Impact factor: 5.411

8.  CHAMPS physical activity questionnaire for older adults: outcomes for interventions.

Authors:  A L Stewart; K M Mills; A C King; W L Haskell; D Gillis; P L Ritter
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2001-07       Impact factor: 5.411

9.  Physical activity and inactivity in an adult population assessed by accelerometry.

Authors:  Maria Hagströmer; Pekka Oja; Michael Sjöström
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2007-09       Impact factor: 5.411

10.  Validation of the telephone and in-person interview versions of the 7-day PAR.

Authors:  Helen A Hayden-Wade; Karen J Coleman; James F Sallis; Colin Armstrong
Journal:  Med Sci Sports Exerc       Date:  2003-05       Impact factor: 5.411

View more
  45 in total

1.  Evaluation of a questionnaire to assess sedentary and active behaviors in the Southern Community Cohort Study.

Authors:  Maciej S Buchowski; Charles E Matthews; Sarah S Cohen; Lisa B Signorello; Jay H Fowke; Margaret K Hargreaves; David G Schlundt; William J Blot
Journal:  J Phys Act Health       Date:  2011-08-02

2.  Relationship between accelerometer-based measures of physical activity and the Yale Physical Activity Survey in adults with arthritis.

Authors:  Pamela Semanik; Jungwha Lee; Larry Manheim; Loretta Dipietro; Dorothy Dunlop; Rowland W Chang
Journal:  Arthritis Care Res (Hoboken)       Date:  2011-12       Impact factor: 4.794

3.  Physical Activity and Related Psychosocial Outcomes From a Pilot Randomized Trial of an Interactive Voice Response System-Supported Intervention in the Deep South.

Authors:  Dori Pekmezi; Cole Ainsworth; Taylor Holly; Victoria Williams; Rodney Joseph; Kaiying Wang; Laura Q Rogers; Bess Marcus; Renee Desmond; Wendy Demark-Wahnefried
Journal:  Health Educ Behav       Date:  2018-06-08

4.  Internet-based physical activity intervention for women with a family history of breast cancer.

Authors:  Sheri J Hartman; Shira I Dunsiger; Catherine R Marinac; Bess H Marcus; Rochelle K Rosen; Kim M Gans
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2015-12       Impact factor: 4.267

5.  Pilot testing of a mindfulness- and acceptance-based intervention for increasing cardiorespiratory fitness in sedentary adults: A feasibility study.

Authors:  E C Martin; N Galloway-Williams; M G Cox; R A Winett
Journal:  J Contextual Behav Sci       Date:  2015-10

6.  Testing the 'teachable moment' premise: does physical activity increase in the early survivorship phase?

Authors:  J M Broderick; J Hussey; M J Kennedy; D M O'Donnell
Journal:  Support Care Cancer       Date:  2013-11-27       Impact factor: 3.603

7.  Social support and physical activity change in Latinas: Results from the Seamos Saludables trial.

Authors:  Becky Marquez; Shira I Dunsiger; Dori Pekmezi; Britta A Larsen; Bess H Marcus
Journal:  Health Psychol       Date:  2016-09-26       Impact factor: 4.267

8.  What keeps a body moving? The brain-derived neurotrophic factor val66met polymorphism and intrinsic motivation to exercise in humans.

Authors:  Ann E Caldwell Hooper; Angela D Bryan; Martin S Hagger
Journal:  J Behav Med       Date:  2014-05-08

9.  Results of a Culturally Adapted Internet-Enhanced Physical Activity Pilot Intervention for Overweight and Obese Young Adult African American Women.

Authors:  Rodney P Joseph; Dori Pekmezi; Gareth R Dutton; Andrea L Cherrington; Young-Il Kim; Jeroan J Allison; Nefertiti H Durant
Journal:  J Transcult Nurs       Date:  2014-06-16       Impact factor: 1.959

10.  Tailored weight loss intervention in obese adults within primary care practice: rationale, design, and methods of Choose to Lose.

Authors:  Sheri J Hartman; Patricia M Risica; Kim M Gans; Bess H Marcus; Charles B Eaton
Journal:  Contemp Clin Trials       Date:  2014-06-15       Impact factor: 2.226

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.