Literature DB >> 19461427

Weekly compared with daily blood glucose monitoring in women with diet-treated gestational diabetes.

J Seth Hawkins1, Brian M Casey, Julie Y Lo, Kristie Moss, Donald D McIntire, Kenneth J Leveno.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To estimate whether daily blood glucose self-monitoring reduces macrosomia when compared with weekly office testing in women with gestational diabetes.
METHODS: Between January 1991 and December 1997, standard treatment at our hospital for women with diet-treated gestational diabetes included routine office monitoring of fasting blood glucose. Beginning in January 1998, blood glucose self-monitoring (four times daily) became the standard management. Women with diet-treated gestational diabetes who underwent routine office-based monitoring of fasting glucose values were compared with similar women who used blood glucose self-monitoring. The outcomes of interest were birthweight at or above 4,000 g and large for gestational age (LGA) in relation to the method of blood glucose self-monitoring.
RESULTS: A total of 315 women used daily blood glucose self-monitoring, and they were compared with 675 women with weekly office-based glucose testing. Women with daily blood glucose self-monitoring had fewer macrosomic (29.5% compared with 21.9%, P=.013) and LGA neonates (34.4% compared with 23.1%, P < or = .001) and gained significantly less weight (median 0.56, interquartile range 0.22-1.08 lb per week compared with 0.74, interquartile range 0.33-1.17 lb per week, P=.009).
CONCLUSION: Daily blood glucose self-monitoring, compared with weekly office-based testing, is associated with a reduction in the incidence of macrosomia. LEVEL OF EVIDENCE: II.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19461427     DOI: 10.1097/AOG.0b013e3181a45a93

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Obstet Gynecol        ISSN: 0029-7844            Impact factor:   7.661


  5 in total

1.  Three Days Compared to One Day Per Week of Self-Monitoring of Blood Glucose in Mild Gestational Diabetes: A Randomized Trial.

Authors:  Jesrine Gek Shan Hong; Ahmad Firdzaus Mohd Noor; Peng Chiong Tan
Journal:  J Clin Med       Date:  2022-06-29       Impact factor: 4.964

Review 2.  Glucose monitoring during pregnancy.

Authors:  J Seth Hawkins
Journal:  Curr Diab Rep       Date:  2010-06       Impact factor: 4.810

Review 3.  Gestational diabetes from A to Z.

Authors:  AbdelHameed Mirghani Dirar; John Doupis
Journal:  World J Diabetes       Date:  2017-12-15

4.  Understanding the Adoption and Diffusion of a Telemonitoring Solution in Gestational Diabetes Mellitus: Qualitative Study.

Authors:  Carine Khalil
Journal:  JMIR Diabetes       Date:  2019-11-28

5.  Enablers and barriers for women with gestational diabetes mellitus to achieve optimal glycaemic control - a qualitative study using the theoretical domains framework.

Authors:  Ruth Martis; Julie Brown; Judith McAra-Couper; Caroline A Crowther
Journal:  BMC Pregnancy Childbirth       Date:  2018-04-11       Impact factor: 3.007

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.