Literature DB >> 19461130

Frustrated bistability as a means to engineer oscillations in biological systems.

S Krishna1, S Semsey, M H Jensen.   

Abstract

Oscillations play an important physiological role in a variety of biological systems. For example, respiration and carbohydrate synthesis are coupled to the circadian clock in cyanobacteria (Ishiura et al 1998 Science 281 1519) and ultradian oscillations with time periods of a few hours have been observed in immune response (NF-kappaB, Hoffmann et al 2002 Science 298 1241, Neson et al 2004 Science 306 704), apoptosis (p53, Lahav et al 2004 Nat. Genet. 36 53), development (Hes, Hirata et al 2002 Science 298 840) and growth hormone secretion (Plotsky and Vale 1985 Science 230 461, Zeitler et al 1991 Proc. Natl. Acad. Sci. USA 88 8920). Here we discuss how any bistable system can be 'frustrated' to produce oscillations of a desired nature--we use the term frustration, in analogy to frustrated spins in antiferromagnets, to refer to the addition of a negative feedback loop that destabilizes the bistable system. We show that the molecular implementation can use a wide variety of methods ranging from translation regulation, using small non-coding RNAs, to targeted protein modification to transcriptional regulation. We also introduce a simple graphical method for determining whether a particular implementation will produce oscillations. The shape of the resulting oscillations can be readily tuned to produce spiky and asymmetric oscillations--quite different from the shapes produced by synthetic oscillators (Elowitz and Leibler 2000 Nature 403 335, Fung et al 2005 Nature 435 118). The time period and amplitude can also be manipulated and these oscillators are easy to reset or switch on and off using a tunable external input. The mechanism of frustrated bistability could thus prove to be an easily implementable way to synthesize flexible, designable oscillators.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19461130     DOI: 10.1088/1478-3975/6/3/036009

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Biol        ISSN: 1478-3967            Impact factor:   2.583


  11 in total

Review 1.  Cell signaling as a cognitive process.

Authors:  Aneta Koseska; Philippe Ih Bastiaens
Journal:  EMBO J       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 11.598

2.  Multi-stability in cellular differentiation enabled by a network of three mutually repressing master regulators.

Authors:  Atchuta Srinivas Duddu; Sarthak Sahoo; Souvadra Hati; Siddharth Jhunjhunwala; Mohit Kumar Jolly
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2020-09-30       Impact factor: 4.118

3.  Modeling the NF-κB mediated inflammatory response predicts cytokine waves in tissue.

Authors:  Pernille Yde; Benedicte Mengel; Mogens H Jensen; Sandeep Krishna; Ala Trusina
Journal:  BMC Syst Biol       Date:  2011-07-19

4.  Effects of Four Different Regulatory Mechanisms on the Dynamics of Gene Regulatory Cascades.

Authors:  Sabine Hansen; Sandeep Krishna; Szabolcs Semsey; Sine Lo Svenningsen
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-07-17       Impact factor: 4.379

5.  Coupled positive and negative feedbacks produce diverse gene expression patterns in colonies.

Authors:  Namiko Mitarai; Mogens Høgh Jensen; Szabolcs Semsey
Journal:  MBio       Date:  2015-04-07       Impact factor: 7.867

6.  Relaxation oscillations and hierarchy of feedbacks in MAPK signaling.

Authors:  Marek Kochańczyk; Paweł Kocieniewski; Emilia Kozłowska; Joanna Jaruszewicz-Błońska; Breanne Sparta; Michael Pargett; John G Albeck; William S Hlavacek; Tomasz Lipniacki
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2017-01-03       Impact factor: 4.379

7.  Combining a Toggle Switch and a Repressilator within the AC-DC Circuit Generates Distinct Dynamical Behaviors.

Authors:  Ruben Perez-Carrasco; Chris P Barnes; Yolanda Schaerli; Mark Isalan; James Briscoe; Karen M Page
Journal:  Cell Syst       Date:  2018-03-21       Impact factor: 10.304

8.  The role of mRNA and protein stability in the function of coupled positive and negative feedback systems in eukaryotic cells.

Authors:  Kristian Moss Bendtsen; Mogens H Jensen; Sandeep Krishna; Szabolcs Semsey
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2015-09-14       Impact factor: 4.379

9.  Genetically tunable frustration controls allostery in an intrinsically disordered transcription factor.

Authors:  Jing Li; Jordan T White; Harry Saavedra; James O Wrabl; Hesam N Motlagh; Kaixian Liu; James Sowers; Trina A Schroer; E Brad Thompson; Vincent J Hilser
Journal:  Elife       Date:  2017-10-12       Impact factor: 8.140

10.  A minimal "push-pull" bistability model explains oscillations between quiescent and proliferative cell states.

Authors:  Sandeep Krishna; Sunil Laxman
Journal:  Mol Biol Cell       Date:  2018-07-25       Impact factor: 4.138

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.