Literature DB >> 19461094

Requirements for diagnosis of malaria at different levels of the laboratory network in Africa.

Earl G Long1.   

Abstract

The rapid increase of resistance to cheap, reliable antimalarials, the increasing cost of effective drugs, and the low specificity of clinical diagnosis has increased the need for more reliable diagnostic methods for malaria. The most commonly used and most reliable remains microscopic examination of stained blood smears, but this technique requires skilled personnel, precision instruments, and ideally a source of electricity. Microscopy has the advantage of enabling the examiner to identify the species, stage, and density of an infection. An alternative to microscopy is the rapid diagnostic test (RDT), which uses a labeled monoclonal antibody to detect circulating parasitic antigens. This test is most commonly used to detect Plasmodium falciparum infections and is available in a plastic cassette format. Both microscopy and RDTs should be available at all levels of laboratory service in endemic areas, but in peripheral laboratories with minimally trained staff, the RDT may be a more practical diagnostic method.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19461094     DOI: 10.1309/AJCPVX71BXWOVWBY

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am J Clin Pathol        ISSN: 0002-9173            Impact factor:   2.493


  7 in total

Review 1.  Malaria Rapid Diagnostic Tests: Literary Review and Recommendation for a Quality Assurance, Quality Control Algorithm.

Authors:  Michael J Kavanaugh; Steven E Azzam; David M Rockabrand
Journal:  Diagnostics (Basel)       Date:  2021-04-25

2.  Adaptation of a visualized loop-mediated isothermal amplification technique for field detection of Plasmodium vivax infection.

Authors:  Zhi-Yong Tao; Hua-Yun Zhou; Hui Xia; Sui Xu; Han-Wu Zhu; Richard L Culleton; Eun-Taek Han; Feng Lu; Qiang Fang; Ya-Ping Gu; Yao-Bao Liu; Guo-Ding Zhu; Wei-Ming Wang; Ju-Lin Li; Jun Cao; Qi Gao
Journal:  Parasit Vectors       Date:  2011-06-21       Impact factor: 3.876

3.  Performance of local light microscopy and the ParaScreen Pan/Pf rapid diagnostic test to detect malaria in health centers in Northwest Ethiopia.

Authors:  Tekola Endeshaw; Patricia M Graves; Berhan Ayele; Aryc W Mosher; Teshome Gebre; Firew Ayalew; Asrat Genet; Alemayehu Mesfin; Estifanos Biru Shargie; Zerihun Tadesse; Tesfaye Teferi; Berhanu Melak; Frank O Richards; Paul M Emerson
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2012-04-20       Impact factor: 3.240

4.  Limit of blank and limit of detection of Plasmodium falciparum thick blood smear microscopy in a routine setting in Central Africa.

Authors:  Fanny Joanny; Sascha J Z Löhr; Thomas Engleitner; Bertrand Lell; Benjamin Mordmüller
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2014-06-14       Impact factor: 2.979

5.  Comparative Performance Evaluation of Routine Malaria Diagnosis at Ho Municipal Hospital.

Authors:  James Osei-Yeboah; Gameli Kwame Norgbe; Sylvester Yao Lokpo; Mohammed Khadijah Kinansua; Loverage Nettey; Emmanuel Alote Allotey
Journal:  J Parasitol Res       Date:  2016-09-25

6.  Performance evaluation of malaria microscopists working at rechecking laboratories in Ethiopia.

Authors:  Abnet Abebe; Meseret Belayneh; Habtamu Asrat; Wondwossen Kassa; Andargachew Gashu; Adino Desale; Getnet Hailu; Tesfaye Mekonnen; Feven Girmachew; Achamyeleh Mulugeta; Ebise Abose; Dereje Yenealem; Abeba G Tsadik; Adisu Kebede; Gonfa Ayana; Kassu Desta
Journal:  Malariaworld J       Date:  2017-06-01

7.  Malaria prevalence and performance of diagnostic tests among patients hospitalized with acute undifferentiated fever in Zanzibar.

Authors:  Annette Onken; Christel Gill Haanshuus; Mohammed Khamis Miraji; Msafiri Marijani; Kibwana Omar Kibwana; Khamis Ali Abeid; Kristine Mørch; Marianne Reimers; Nina Langeland; Fredrik Müller; Pål A Jenum; Bjørn Blomberg
Journal:  Malar J       Date:  2022-02-19       Impact factor: 2.979

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.