Sue Hall1, Susan Longhurst, Irene Higginson. 1. King's College London, Department of Palliative Care, Policy and Rehabilitation, London, UK. sue.hall@kcl.ac.uk
Abstract
BACKGROUND: most older people living in nursing homes die there. An empirically based model of dignity has been developed, which forms the basis of a brief psychotherapy to help promote dignity and reduce distress at the end of life. OBJECTIVE: to explore the generalisability of the dignity model to older people in nursing homes. METHODS: qualitative interviews were used to explore views on maintaining dignity of 18 residents of nursing homes. A qualitative descriptive approach was used. The analysis was both deductive (arising from the dignity model) and inductive (arising from participants' views). RESULTS: the main categories of the dignity model were broadly supported: illness-related concerns, social aspects of the illness experience and dignity conserving repertoire. However, subthemes relating to death were not supported and two new themes emerged. Some residents saw their symptoms and loss of function as due to old age rather than illness. Although residents did not appear to experience distress due to thoughts of impending death, they were distressed by the multiple losses they had experienced. CONCLUSIONS: these findings add to our understanding of the concerns of older people in care homes on maintaining dignity and suggest that dignity therapy may bolster their sense of dignity.
BACKGROUND: most older people living in nursing homes die there. An empirically based model of dignity has been developed, which forms the basis of a brief psychotherapy to help promote dignity and reduce distress at the end of life. OBJECTIVE: to explore the generalisability of the dignity model to older people in nursing homes. METHODS: qualitative interviews were used to explore views on maintaining dignity of 18 residents of nursing homes. A qualitative descriptive approach was used. The analysis was both deductive (arising from the dignity model) and inductive (arising from participants' views). RESULTS: the main categories of the dignity model were broadly supported: illness-related concerns, social aspects of the illness experience and dignity conserving repertoire. However, subthemes relating to death were not supported and two new themes emerged. Some residents saw their symptoms and loss of function as due to old age rather than illness. Although residents did not appear to experience distress due to thoughts of impending death, they were distressed by the multiple losses they had experienced. CONCLUSIONS: these findings add to our understanding of the concerns of older people in care homes on maintaining dignity and suggest that dignity therapy may bolster their sense of dignity.
Authors: Eefje M Sizoo; Martin J B Taphoorn; Bernard Uitdehaag; Jan J Heimans; Luc Deliens; Jaap C Reijneveld; H Roeline W Pasman Journal: Oncologist Date: 2013-01-18
Authors: Kenneth Chambaere; Judith A C Rietjens; Tinne Smets; Johan Bilsen; Reginald Deschepper; H Roeline W Pasman; Luc Deliens Journal: BMC Public Health Date: 2012-06-18 Impact factor: 3.295
Authors: Gwenda Albers; H Roeline W Pasman; Mette L Rurup; Henrica C W de Vet; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2011-06-19 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Claudia Bausewein; Natalia Calanzani; Barbara A Daveson; Steffen T Simon; Pedro L Ferreira; Irene J Higginson; Dorothee Bechinger-English; Luc Deliens; Marjolein Gysels; Franco Toscani; Lucas Ceulemans; Richard Harding; Barbara Gomes Journal: BMC Cancer Date: 2013-03-08 Impact factor: 4.430
Authors: Mariska G Oosterveld-Vlug; H Roeline W Pasman; Isis E van Gennip; Dick L Willems; Bregje D Onwuteaka-Philipsen Journal: PLoS One Date: 2013-09-12 Impact factor: 3.240