Literature DB >> 19459840

A model-based approach for making ecological inference from distance sampling data.

Devin S Johnson1, Jeffrey L Laake, Jay M Ver Hoef.   

Abstract

We consider a fully model-based approach for the analysis of distance sampling data. Distance sampling has been widely used to estimate abundance (or density) of animals or plants in a spatially explicit study area. There is, however, no readily available method of making statistical inference on the relationships between abundance and environmental covariates. Spatial Poisson process likelihoods can be used to simultaneously estimate detection and intensity parameters by modeling distance sampling data as a thinned spatial point process. A model-based spatial approach to distance sampling data has three main benefits: it allows complex and opportunistic transect designs to be employed, it allows estimation of abundance in small subregions, and it provides a framework to assess the effects of habitat or experimental manipulation on density. We demonstrate the model-based methodology with a small simulation study and analysis of the Dubbo weed data set. In addition, a simple ad hoc method for handling overdispersion is also proposed. The simulation study showed that the model-based approach compared favorably to conventional distance sampling methods for abundance estimation. In addition, the overdispersion correction performed adequately when the number of transects was high. Analysis of the Dubbo data set indicated a transect effect on abundance via Akaike's information criterion model selection. Further goodness-of-fit analysis, however, indicated some potential confounding of intensity with the detection function.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19459840     DOI: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2009.01265.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Biometrics        ISSN: 0006-341X            Impact factor:   2.571


  7 in total

1.  Distance software: design and analysis of distance sampling surveys for estimating population size.

Authors:  Len Thomas; Stephen T Buckland; Eric A Rexstad; Jeff L Laake; Samantha Strindberg; Sharon L Hedley; Jon Rb Bishop; Tiago A Marques; Kenneth P Burnham
Journal:  J Appl Ecol       Date:  2010-02       Impact factor: 6.528

2.  A Hierarchical Distance Sampling Approach to Estimating Mortality Rates from Opportunistic Carcass Surveillance Data.

Authors:  Steve E Bellan; Olivier Gimenez; Rémi Choquet; Wayne M Getz
Journal:  Methods Ecol Evol       Date:  2013-04-01       Impact factor: 7.781

3.  A Unifying Model for Capture-Recapture and Distance Sampling Surveys of Wildlife Populations.

Authors:  D L Borchers; B C Stevenson; D Kidney; L Thomas; T A Marques
Journal:  J Am Stat Assoc       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 5.033

4.  Bayes and empirical Bayes estimators of abundance and density from spatial capture-recapture data.

Authors:  Robert M Dorazio
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-12-27       Impact factor: 3.240

5.  Using simulation to evaluate wildlife survey designs: polar bears and seals in the Chukchi Sea.

Authors:  Paul B Conn; Erin E Moreland; Eric V Regehr; Erin L Richmond; Michael F Cameron; Peter L Boveng
Journal:  R Soc Open Sci       Date:  2016-01-27       Impact factor: 2.963

6.  Distribution Drivers of the Alien Butterfly Geranium Bronze (Cacyreus marshalli) in an Alpine Protected Area and Indications for an Effective Management.

Authors:  Emanuel Rocchia; Massimiliano Luppi; Federica Paradiso; Silvia Ghidotti; Francesca Martelli; Cristiana Cerrato; Ramona Viterbi; Simona Bonelli
Journal:  Biology (Basel)       Date:  2022-04-07

7.  Statistical Efficiency in Distance Sampling.

Authors:  Robert Graham Clark
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2016-03-07       Impact factor: 3.240

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.