BACKGROUND: Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by aggregates of the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT). A nonsignificant trend for positive family history has been observed in two case-control studies and several pedigrees with familial clustering of parkinsonism have been described. Occasionally, mutations in MAPT are found in patients with a clinical phenotype similar to PSP. In this case-control study, we compared the occurrence of dementia and parkinsonism among first-degree relatives of patients with PSP with an age- and sex-matched control group. METHODS: Family history of dementia and parkinsonism was collected from all first-degree relatives of patients with PSP who fulfilled the international National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke criteria for PSP. Age- and sex-matched controls were selected from the Rotterdam Study. Genetic testing and pathologic examination was performed in a subset of familial PSP cases. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (33%) of the 172 patients with PSP had at least one first-degree relative who had dementia or parkinsonism compared to 131 (25%) of the control subjects (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.13). In patients with PSP, more first-degree relatives with parkinsonism were observed compared to controls, with an OR 3.9 (95% CI 1.99-7.61). Twelve patients with PSP (7%) fulfilled the criteria for an autosomal dominant mode of transmission. The intrafamilial phenotype within these pedigrees varied among PSP, dementia, tremor, and parkinsonism. Genetic studies revealed one patient with a P301L mutation in MAPT. Pathologic examination of five familial cases confirmed the clinical diagnosis of PSP, with predominant four repeat tau pathology in affected brain areas. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates familial aggregation of parkinsonism in progressive supranuclear palsy.
BACKGROUND:Progressive supranuclear palsy (PSP) is a progressive neurodegenerative disorder characterized by aggregates of the microtubule-associated protein tau (MAPT). A nonsignificant trend for positive family history has been observed in two case-control studies and several pedigrees with familial clustering of parkinsonism have been described. Occasionally, mutations in MAPT are found in patients with a clinical phenotype similar to PSP. In this case-control study, we compared the occurrence of dementia and parkinsonism among first-degree relatives of patients with PSP with an age- and sex-matched control group. METHODS: Family history of dementia and parkinsonism was collected from all first-degree relatives of patients with PSP who fulfilled the international National Institute of Neurological Disorders and Stroke criteria for PSP. Age- and sex-matched controls were selected from the Rotterdam Study. Genetic testing and pathologic examination was performed in a subset of familial PSP cases. RESULTS: Fifty-seven (33%) of the 172 patients with PSP had at least one first-degree relative who had dementia or parkinsonism compared to 131 (25%) of the control subjects (odds ratio [OR] 1.5, 95% confidence interval [CI] 1.01-2.13). In patients with PSP, more first-degree relatives with parkinsonism were observed compared to controls, with an OR 3.9 (95% CI 1.99-7.61). Twelve patients with PSP (7%) fulfilled the criteria for an autosomal dominant mode of transmission. The intrafamilial phenotype within these pedigrees varied among PSP, dementia, tremor, and parkinsonism. Genetic studies revealed one patient with a P301L mutation in MAPT. Pathologic examination of five familial cases confirmed the clinical diagnosis of PSP, with predominant four repeat tau pathology in affected brain areas. CONCLUSION: This study demonstrates familial aggregation of parkinsonism in progressive supranuclear palsy.
Authors: Leonie J M Vergouw; Shamiram Melhem; Laura Donker Kaat; Wang Z Chiu; Demy J S Kuipers; Guido Breedveld; Agnita J W Boon; Li-San Wang; Adam C Naj; Elizabeth Mlynarksi; Laura Cantwell; Marialuisa Quadri; Owen A Ross; Dennis W Dickson; Gerard D Schellenberg; John C van Swieten; Vincenzo Bonifati; Frank Jan de Jong Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2020-04-30 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Emilia M Gatto; Ricardo F Allegri; Gustavo Da Prat; Patricio Chrem Mendez; David S Hanna; Michael O Dorschner; Ezequiel I Surace; Cyrus P Zabetian; Ignacio F Mata Journal: Neurobiol Aging Date: 2017-02-10 Impact factor: 4.673
Authors: Adam L Boxer; Jin-Tai Yu; Lawrence I Golbe; Irene Litvan; Anthony E Lang; Günter U Höglinger Journal: Lancet Neurol Date: 2017-06-13 Impact factor: 44.182
Authors: Monica Sanchez-Contreras; Michael G Heckman; Pawel Tacik; Nancy Diehl; Patricia H Brown; Alexandra I Soto-Ortolaza; Elizabeth A Christopher; Ronald L Walton; Owen A Ross; Lawrence I Golbe; Neill Graff-Radford; Zbigniew K Wszolek; Dennis W Dickson; Rosa Rademakers Journal: Mov Disord Date: 2016-10-06 Impact factor: 10.338
Authors: Jonathan D Rohrer; Dominic Paviour; Jana Vandrovcova; John Hodges; Rohan de Silva; Martin N Rossor Journal: Neurodegener Dis Date: 2010-09-14 Impact factor: 2.977