Literature DB >> 19458146

Contrast sensitivity of cats and humans in scotopic and mesopic conditions.

Incheol Kang1, Rachel E Reem, Amy L Kaczmarowski, Joseph G Malpeli.   

Abstract

Human contrast sensitivity in low scotopic conditions is regulated according to the deVries-Rose law. Previous cat behavioral data, as well as cat and mice electrophysiological data, have not confirmed this relationship. To resolve this discrepancy at the behavioral level, we compared sensitivity in dim light for cats and humans in parallel experiments using the same visual stimuli and similar behavioral paradigms. Both species had to detect Gabor functions (SD = 1.5 degrees, spatial frequencies from 0 to 4 cpd, temporal frequency 4 Hz) presented 8 degrees to the right or left of a central fixation point over an 8 log-unit range of adaptation levels spanning scotopic vision and extending well into the mesopic range. Cats had 0.74 log unit greater absolute sensitivity than that of humans for spatial frequencies <or=1/8 cpd. Cats had better contrast sensitivity overall for spatial frequencies <1/2 cpd, whereas humans were more sensitive for spatial frequencies above this. However, most of the cat's sensitivity advantage for low spatial frequencies could be accounted for by the greater light-concentrating abilities of its optics. Contrast sensitivity to 4 cpd was poor or absent in the scotopic range for both species. For both, scotopic increment thresholds were proportional to the square root of retinal illuminance, in accordance with the deVries-Rose law. Overall, cat and human visual systems appear to operate under very similar constraints for rod vision, including the regulation of contrast sensitivity across adaptation levels. A companion paper compares sensitivity of neurons in the lateral geniculate nucleus to these behavioral data.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19458146      PMCID: PMC2724355          DOI: 10.1152/jn.90641.2008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Neurophysiol        ISSN: 0022-3077            Impact factor:   2.714


  32 in total

1.  THE SCHEMATIC EYE IN THE CAT.

Authors:  G J VAKKUR; P O BISHOP
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1963-11       Impact factor: 1.886

2.  The staircrase-method in psychophysics.

Authors:  T N CORNSWEET
Journal:  Am J Psychol       Date:  1962-09

3.  Spatial vision of the cat: variation with eccentricity.

Authors:  T Pasternak; K Horn
Journal:  Vis Neurosci       Date:  1991-02       Impact factor: 3.241

Review 4.  Into the twilight zone: the complexities of mesopic vision and luminous efficiency.

Authors:  Andrew Stockman; Lindsay T Sharpe
Journal:  Ophthalmic Physiol Opt       Date:  2006-05       Impact factor: 3.117

5.  Visual acuity of the cat.

Authors:  S G Jacobson; K B Franklin; W I McDonald
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1976       Impact factor: 1.886

6.  Temporal summation for grating patches detected at low light levels.

Authors:  G L Savage
Journal:  Optom Vis Sci       Date:  1996-06       Impact factor: 1.973

7.  Resolution and contrast sensitivity at low luminances.

Authors:  A van Meeteren; J J Vos
Journal:  Vision Res       Date:  1972-05       Impact factor: 1.886

8.  Cat colour vision: one cone process or several?

Authors:  N W Daw; A L Pearlman
Journal:  J Physiol       Date:  1969-05       Impact factor: 5.182

9.  Perimetry of contrast detection thresholds of moving spatial sine wave patterns. IV. The influence of the mean retinal illuminance.

Authors:  J J Koenderink; M A Bouman; A E Bueno de Mesquita; S Slappendel
Journal:  J Opt Soc Am       Date:  1978-06

10.  Activity in the parabigeminal nucleus during eye movements directed at moving and stationary targets.

Authors:  He Cui; Joseph G Malpeli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2003-02-26       Impact factor: 2.714

View more
  6 in total

1.  Dim-light sensitivity of cells in the awake cat's lateral geniculate and medial interlaminar nuclei: a correlation with behavior.

Authors:  Incheol Kang; Joseph G Malpeli
Journal:  J Neurophysiol       Date:  2009-05-20       Impact factor: 2.714

2.  Contrast sensitivity in a harbor seal (Phoca vitulina).

Authors:  Frederike D Hanke; Christine Scholtyssek; Wolf Hanke; Guido Dehnhardt
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2010-10-28       Impact factor: 1.836

3.  Setup and data analysis for functional magnetic resonance imaging of awake cat visual cortex.

Authors:  Manxiu Ma; Chencan Qian; Yanxia Li; Zhentao Zuo; Zuxiang Liu
Journal:  Neurosci Bull       Date:  2013-06-14       Impact factor: 5.203

4.  Cats Parallel Great Apes and Corvids in Motor Self-Regulation - Not Brain but Material Size Matters.

Authors:  Katarzyna Bobrowicz; Mathias Osvath
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-10-22

5.  How conspicuous are peacock eyespots and other colorful feathers in the eyes of mammalian predators?

Authors:  Suzanne Amador Kane; Yuchao Wang; Rui Fang; Yabin Lu; Roslyn Dakin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2019-04-24       Impact factor: 3.240

6.  Effect of Varying Levels of Glare on Contrast Sensitivity Measurements of Young Healthy Individuals Under Photopic and Mesopic Vision.

Authors:  Marcello Maniglia; Steven M Thurman; Aaron R Seitz; Pinakin G Davey
Journal:  Front Psychol       Date:  2018-06-14
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.