Literature DB >> 19457982

Interactive effects of soil water deficit and air vapour pressure deficit on mesophyll conductance to CO2 in Vitis vinifera and Olea europaea.

A Perez-Martin1, J Flexas, M Ribas-Carbó, J Bota, M Tomás, J M Infante, A Diaz-Espejo.   

Abstract

The present work aims to study the interactive effect of drought stress and high vapour pressure deficit (VPD) on leaf gas exchange, and especially on mesophyll conductance to CO(2) (g(m)), in two woody species of great agronomical importance in the Mediterranean basin: Vitis vinifera L. cv. Tempranillo and Olea europaea L. cv. Manzanilla. Plants were grown in specially designed outdoor chambers with ambient and below ambient VPD, under both well-irrigated and drought conditions. g(m) was estimated by the variable J method from simultaneous measurements of gas exchange and fluorescence. In both species, the response to soil water deficit was larger in g(s) than in g(m), and more important than the response to VPD. Olea europaea was apparently more sensitive to VPD, so that plants growing in more humid chambers showed higher g(s) and g(m). In V. vinifera, in contrast, soil water deficit dominated the response of g(s) and g(m). Consequently, changes in g(m)/g(s) were more related to VPD in O. europaea and to soil water deficit in V. vinifera. Most of the limitations of photosynthesis were diffusional and especially due to stomatal closure. No biochemical limitation was detected. The results showed that structural parameters played an important role in determining g(m) during the acclimation process. Although the relationship between leaf mass per unit area (M(A)) with g(m) was scattered, it imposed a limitation to the maximum g(m) achievable, with higher values of M(A) in O. europaea at lower g(m) values. M(A) decreased under water stress in O. europaea but it increased in V. vinifera. This resulted in a negative relationship between M(A) and the CO(2) draw-down between substomatal cavities and chloroplasts in O. europaea, while being positive in V. vinifera.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457982     DOI: 10.1093/jxb/erp145

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Exp Bot        ISSN: 0022-0957            Impact factor:   6.992


  16 in total

1.  How will climate change influence grapevine cv. Tempranillo photosynthesis under different soil textures?

Authors:  Urtzi Leibar; Ana Aizpurua; Olatz Unamunzaga; Inmaculada Pascual; Fermín Morales
Journal:  Photosynth Res       Date:  2015-03-19       Impact factor: 3.573

2.  Variable Mesophyll Conductance among Soybean Cultivars Sets a Tradeoff between Photosynthesis and Water-Use-Efficiency.

Authors:  Nicholas J Tomeo; David M Rosenthal
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2017-03-07       Impact factor: 8.340

Review 3.  Cost-benefit analysis of mesophyll conductance: diversities of anatomical, biochemical and environmental determinants.

Authors:  Yusuke Mizokami; Riichi Oguchi; Daisuke Sugiura; Wataru Yamori; Ko Noguchi; Ichiro Terashima
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2022-09-19       Impact factor: 5.040

4.  Salinity stress constrains photosynthesis in Fraxinus ornus more when growing in partial shading than in full sunlight: consequences for the antioxidant defence system.

Authors:  Alessio Fini; Lucia Guidi; Cristiana Giordano; Maria Camilla Baratto; Francesco Ferrini; Cecilia Brunetti; Luca Calamai; Massimiliano Tattini
Journal:  Ann Bot       Date:  2014-07-08       Impact factor: 4.357

5.  Mitochondrial alternative oxidase maintains respiration and preserves photosynthetic capacity during moderate drought in Nicotiana tabacum.

Authors:  Keshav Dahal; Jia Wang; Greg D Martyn; Farkhunda Rahimy; Greg C Vanlerberghe
Journal:  Plant Physiol       Date:  2014-09-09       Impact factor: 8.340

6.  Regulation of photosynthesis and stomatal and mesophyll conductance under water stress and recovery in olive trees: correlation with gene expression of carbonic anhydrase and aquaporins.

Authors:  Alfonso Perez-Martin; Chiara Michelazzo; Jose M Torres-Ruiz; Jaume Flexas; José E Fernández; Luca Sebastiani; Antonio Diaz-Espejo
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2014-05-05       Impact factor: 6.992

Review 7.  Elevated-CO2 Response of Stomata and Its Dependence on Environmental Factors.

Authors:  Zhenzhu Xu; Yanling Jiang; Bingrui Jia; Guangsheng Zhou
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-05-13       Impact factor: 5.753

8.  Genotypically Identifying Wheat Mesophyll Conductance Regulation under Progressive Drought Stress.

Authors:  Katarina Olsovska; Marek Kovar; Marian Brestic; Marek Zivcak; Pavol Slamka; Hong Bo Shao
Journal:  Front Plant Sci       Date:  2016-08-08       Impact factor: 5.753

9.  Threshold response of mesophyll CO2 conductance to leaf hydraulics in highly transpiring hybrid poplar clones exposed to soil drying.

Authors:  Guillaume Théroux-Rancourt; Gilbert Éthier; Steeve Pepin
Journal:  J Exp Bot       Date:  2013-12-24       Impact factor: 6.992

10.  Ultrasonic Sensing of Plant Water Needs for Agriculture.

Authors:  Tomas Gómez Álvarez-Arenas; Eustaquio Gil-Pelegrin; Joao Ealo Cuello; Maria Dolores Fariñas; Domingo Sancho-Knapik; David Alejandro Collazos Burbano; Jose Javier Peguero-Pina
Journal:  Sensors (Basel)       Date:  2016-07-14       Impact factor: 3.576

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.