Literature DB >> 19457804

MR hysterosalpingography compared with conventional hysterosalpingography.

James E Silberzweig.   

Abstract

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457804     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.08.2171

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


× No keyword cloud information.
  2 in total

1.  Conventional and magnetic resonance hysterosalpingography in assessing tubal patency-A comparative study.

Authors:  Devimeenal Jagannathan; Fouzal Hithaya
Journal:  Indian J Radiol Imaging       Date:  2019 Apr-Jun

2.  Comparison between X-ray-hysterosalpingography and 3 Tesla magnetic resonance-hysterosalpingography in the assessment of the tubal patency in the cause of female infertility.

Authors:  Cristina Pace; Renato Argirò; Luisa Casadei; Matteo Cesareni; Antonio Orlacchio
Journal:  Radiol Med       Date:  2022-09-27       Impact factor: 6.313

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.