Literature DB >> 19457799

Vision and quality in the digital imaging environment: how much does the visual acuity of radiologists vary at an intermediate distance?

Nabile M Safdar1, Khan M Siddiqui, Farah Qureshi, Muhammad Kashif Mirza, Nancy Knight, Paul Nagy, Eliot Siegel.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: The purpose of this study was to examine the intermediate-distance visual acuity of a cross section of radiologists and to identify variation in visual acuity during a typical workday. SUBJECTS AND METHODS: Forty-eight radiologists completed a brief survey before undergoing visual acuity testing, with corrective lenses if routinely used, at three times of the day. Testing was performed with modified versions of a U.S. Federal Aviation Administration visual acuity test instrument.
RESULTS: The mean acuity of radiologists across all measurements was 20/15 (logarithm of the minimum angle of resolution [logMAR], -0.109 +/- 0.105 [SD]). Visual acuity ranged from 20/30 to 20/10 (logMAR, 0.176 to -0.301). Mean visual acuity in the morning session was approximately 20/16 (logMAR, -0.0856). This value was statistically significantly lower than the mean visual acuity in both the early afternoon (logMAR, -0.124; p = 0.003) and the late afternoon (logMAR, -0.118; p = 0.015), both of which were approximately 20/15. This change was within the expected test-retest variability of Snellen acuity measurements.
CONCLUSION: Although a statistically significant difference was detected between the visual acuity of radiologists in the morning and acuity in other parts of the day, this difference was relatively modest and within previously published ranges of variability for similar visual acuity tests. It is unlikely that such variation in visual acuity among radiologists influences diagnostic performance. Not every radiologist had 20/20 vision, a few needed visual correction, and more than a few had not undergone a thorough eye examination for as many as 15 years before the study.

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457799     DOI: 10.2214/AJR.07.3515

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  AJR Am J Roentgenol        ISSN: 0361-803X            Impact factor:   3.959


  2 in total

1.  Blurred digital mammography images: an analysis of technical recall and observer detection performance.

Authors:  Wang Kei Ma; Rita Borgen; Judith Kelly; Sara Millington; Beverley Hilton; Rob Aspin; Carla Lança; Peter Hogg
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2017-01-30       Impact factor: 3.039

2.  Ocular health among radiologists in the age of PACS: is it time for our profession to open its eyes to this issue in light of existing European legislation?

Authors:  D Halpenny; D O'Driscoll; W C Torreggiani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2012-08-29       Impact factor: 3.039

  2 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.