Literature DB >> 19457720

Original Koyanagi urethroplasty versus modified Hayashi technique: outcome in 57 patients.

Massimo Catti1, Henri Lottmann, Sergei Babloyan, Stephen Lortat-Jacob, Pierre Mouriquand.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVE: To compare outcomes of the original Koyanagi technique with the Hayashi modification in severe hypospadias, i.e. hypospadias with a division of the corpus spongiosum located behind the penile midshaft associated with marked hypoplasia of the ventral aspect of the penis and a non-preservable urethral plate. Choice of technique for treating severe hypospadias is discussed. PATIENTS AND METHODS: Twenty-six patients (group I) were operated in Lyon using the original Koyanagi procedure and 31 (group II) underwent a modified Hayashi procedure in Paris. Most patients received preoperative androgenic stimulation. Mean follow up was 25 months (group I) and 34 months (group II).
RESULTS: Sixteen patients (61.5%) in group I and 19 (61.3%) in group II developed complications leading to 21 additional procedures in each group. Urethral dehiscence was found in 11/26 patients in group I (42.3%), and in 6/31 patients in group II (19.3%); fistulae were respectively found in 5/26 (19.2%) and 12/31 (38.7%), and stenosis in 9/26 (34.6%) and 5/31 (16.1%) patients. Urethrocele was found in 7/26 (26.9%) and 5/31 (16%) patients, respectively. Twelve (group I) and 7 (group II) patients are awaiting re-operation.
CONCLUSION: Although the complication rate is quite similar between the original and the modified Koyanagi procedure, the Hayashi technique seems to provide a better distal blood supply to the reconstructed urethra.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457720     DOI: 10.1016/j.jpurol.2009.03.010

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Pediatr Urol        ISSN: 1477-5131            Impact factor:   1.830


  6 in total

Review 1.  The influence of perioperative factors on primary severe hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Marco Castagnetti; Alaa El-Ghoneimi
Journal:  Nat Rev Urol       Date:  2011-04       Impact factor: 14.432

Review 2.  The influence of pre-operative hormonal stimulation on hypospadias repair.

Authors:  Nathan C Wong; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Front Pediatr       Date:  2015-04-22       Impact factor: 3.418

Review 3.  The contemporary role of 1 vs. 2-stage repair for proximal hypospadias.

Authors:  Shawn Dason; Nathan Wong; Luis H Braga
Journal:  Transl Androl Urol       Date:  2014-12

4.  Results of the one-stage proximal hypospadias repair with modified Koyanagi technique: A prospective cohort study in a single Vietnam centre.

Authors:  Tuan Hong Vu; Hoa Viet Nguyen; Quan Quy Hong; Hung Quang Pham; Tung Thanh Pham; Đang Hai Do; Thanh Đo Truong
Journal:  Ann Med Surg (Lond)       Date:  2021-11-02

5.  Single-stage versus staged interposition urethroplasty for glandular hypospadias with severe penile curvature: 15-year experience.

Authors:  Guanglun Zhou; Wanhua Xu; Jianchun Yin; Junjie Sun; Zhilin Yang; Shoulin Li
Journal:  World J Urol       Date:  2021-09-05       Impact factor: 4.226

6.  Two simple modifications can potentially change the future of proximal hypospadias surgery. Our series and a review of the literature.

Authors:  Rezkalla Akkary; Mirella Ripepi; Orion Akokpe; Hamdi Louati; Clemence Klipfel; Stephan Geiss
Journal:  Int J Pediatr Adolesc Med       Date:  2020-07-09
  6 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.