Literature DB >> 19457631

Whole-body MRI for the staging and follow-up of patients with metastasis.

Gerwin P Schmidt1, Maximilian F Reiser, Andrea Baur-Melnyk.   

Abstract

The advent of whole-body MRI (WB-MRI) has introduced tumor imaging with a systemic approach compared to established sequential, multi-modal diagnostic algorithms. Hardware innovations, such as the introduction of multi-receiver channel whole-body scanners at 1.5 T and recently 3T, combined with acquisition acceleration techniques, have made high resolution WB-MRI clinically feasible. Now, a dedicated assessment of individual organs with various soft tissue contrast, spatial resolution and contrast media dynamics can be combined with whole-body anatomic coverage in a multi-planar imaging approach. More flexible protocols, e.g. including T1-weighted TSE- and STIR-imaging, dedicated lung imaging or dynamic contrast-enhanced studies of the abdomen can be performed within less than 45 min. For initial tumor staging PET-CT as a competing whole-body modality in oncologic imaging has proved more accurate for the definition of T-stage and lymph node assessment, using the additional metabolic information of PET for the assessment of tumor viability and therapy response. However, new applications, such as MR-whole-body diffusion imaging, may significantly increase sensitivity in near future. WB-MRI has shown advantages for the detection of distant metastatic disease, especially from tumors frequently spreading to the liver or brain and it is especially useful as a radiation-free alternative for the surveillance of tumor patients with multiple follow-up exams. Furthermore, it has been introduced as a whole-body bone marrow screening application. Within this context WB-MRI is highly accurate for the detection of skeletal metastases and staging of hematologic diseases, such as multiple myeloma or lymphoma. This article summarizes recent developments and applications of WB-MRI and highlights its performance within the scope of systemic oncologic staging and surveillance.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457631     DOI: 10.1016/j.ejrad.2009.03.045

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Eur J Radiol        ISSN: 0720-048X            Impact factor:   3.528


  36 in total

1.  In vivo assembly of nanoparticle components to improve targeted cancer imaging.

Authors:  Steven D Perrault; Warren C W Chan
Journal:  Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A       Date:  2010-06-07       Impact factor: 11.205

2.  The role of magnetic resonance imaging in oncology.

Authors:  Concepción González Hernando; Laura Esteban; Teresa Cañas; Enrique Van den Brule; Miguel Pastrana
Journal:  Clin Transl Oncol       Date:  2010-09       Impact factor: 3.405

3.  Early treatment response evaluation in patients with diffuse large B-cell lymphoma--a pilot study comparing volumetric MRI and PET/CT.

Authors:  Xingchen Wu; Prasun Dastidar; Hannu Pertovaara; Pasi Korkola; Ritva Järvenpää; Maija Rossi; Tiit Kööbi; Hannu Eskola; Pirkko-Liisa Kellokumpu-Lehtinen
Journal:  Mol Imaging Biol       Date:  2011-08       Impact factor: 3.488

Review 4.  Whole-body MR imaging, bone diffusion imaging: how and why?

Authors:  Diego Jaramillo
Journal:  Pediatr Radiol       Date:  2010-04-30

5.  Prospective comparison of combined 18F-FDG and 18F-NaF PET/CT vs. 18F-FDG PET/CT imaging for detection of malignancy.

Authors:  Frank I Lin; Jyotsna E Rao; Erik S Mittra; Kavitha Nallapareddy; Alka Chengapa; David W Dick; Sanjiv Sam Gambhir; Andrei Iagaru
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2011-11-08       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 6.  Multiplexed imaging in cancer diagnosis: applications and future advances.

Authors:  Hisataka Kobayashi; Michelle R Longmire; Mikako Ogawa; Peter L Choyke; Satomi Kawamoto
Journal:  Lancet Oncol       Date:  2010-03-24       Impact factor: 41.316

Review 7.  Clinical and research applications of simultaneous positron emission tomography and MRI.

Authors:  F Fraioli; S Punwani
Journal:  Br J Radiol       Date:  2013-11-14       Impact factor: 3.039

8.  Whole-body MRI in patients with Non-bacterial Osteitis: Radiological findings and correlation with clinical data.

Authors:  A P Arnoldi; C L Schlett; H Douis; L L Geyer; A M Voit; F Bleisteiner; A F Jansson; S Weckbach
Journal:  Eur Radiol       Date:  2016-09-23       Impact factor: 5.315

Review 9.  Diagnostic imaging to detect and evaluate response to therapy in bone metastases from prostate cancer: current modalities and new horizons.

Authors:  Laura Evangelista; Francesco Bertoldo; Francesco Boccardo; Giario Conti; Ilario Menchi; Francesco Mungai; Umberto Ricardi; Emilio Bombardieri
Journal:  Eur J Nucl Med Mol Imaging       Date:  2016-03-09       Impact factor: 9.236

Review 10.  Pelvic incidentalomas.

Authors:  R M Gore; G M Newmark; K H Thakrar; U K Mehta; J W Berlin
Journal:  Cancer Imaging       Date:  2010-10-04       Impact factor: 3.909

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.