Literature DB >> 19457372

Made you look! Consciously perceived, irrelevant instructional cues can hijack the attentional network.

Katherine Sledge Moore1, Clare B Porter, Daniel H Weissman.   

Abstract

Functional neuroimaging studies of endogenous cued attention suggest that a fronto-parietal attentional network keeps track of current task objectives in working memory and enhances activity in posterior sensory regions that underlie the perceptual processing of behaviorally relevant stimuli. Relatively little is known, however, about whether consciously perceived, irrelevant instructional cues can hijack the attentional network, leading to an enhancement of the perceptual processing of irrelevant stimuli. Using a cross-modal attentional cueing task in combination with functional magnetic resonance imaging, we found that such irrelevant cues can indeed hijack the attentional network, as indexed by increased activity in (a) frontal regions that control attention and (b) sensory cortices that underlie the perceptual processing of task-irrelevant stimuli. Furthermore, we found that in left ventrolateral (but not dorsolateral) prefrontal regions, the magnitude of this increased activity varies with whether an irrelevant instructional cue is presented simultaneously with (versus after) a relevant instructional cue. These findings show that consciously perceived, irrelevant instructional cues can activate inappropriate task objectives in working memory, resulting in a hijacking of the attentional network. Moreover, they reveal different time courses of hijacking effects in ventrolateral and dorsolateral prefrontal regions, consistent with models in which these regions make distinct contributions to cognitive control.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457372      PMCID: PMC2686060          DOI: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2009.01.042

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Neuroimage        ISSN: 1053-8119            Impact factor:   6.556


  58 in total

1.  Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI II. Analysis.

Authors:  J M Ollinger; M Corbetta; G L Shulman
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.556

2.  Separating processes within a trial in event-related functional MRI I. The Method.

Authors:  J M Ollinger; G L Shulman; M Corbetta
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2001-01       Impact factor: 6.556

3.  The neural mechanisms of top-down attentional control.

Authors:  J B Hopfinger; M H Buonocore; G R Mangun
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

4.  Characterizing the hemodynamic response: effects of presentation rate, sampling procedure, and the possibility of ordering brain activity based on relative timing.

Authors:  F M Miezin; L Maccotta; J M Ollinger; S E Petersen; R L Buckner
Journal:  Neuroimage       Date:  2000-06       Impact factor: 6.556

5.  Areas involved in encoding and applying directional expectations to moving objects.

Authors:  G L Shulman; J M Ollinger; E Akbudak; T E Conturo; A Z Snyder; S E Petersen; M Corbetta
Journal:  J Neurosci       Date:  1999-11-01       Impact factor: 6.167

6.  Interactions between visual working memory and selective attention.

Authors:  P E Downing
Journal:  Psychol Sci       Date:  2000-11

7.  Prefrontal regions play a predominant role in imposing an attentional 'set': evidence from fMRI.

Authors:  M T Banich; M P Milham; R A Atchley; N J Cohen; A Webb; T Wszalek; A F Kramer; Z Liang; V Barad; D Gullett; C Shah; C Brown
Journal:  Brain Res Cogn Brain Res       Date:  2000-09

8.  Voluntary orienting is dissociated from target detection in human posterior parietal cortex.

Authors:  M Corbetta; J M Kincade; J M Ollinger; M P McAvoy; G L Shulman
Journal:  Nat Neurosci       Date:  2000-03       Impact factor: 24.884

9.  Altered neural substrates of cognitive control in childhood ADHD: evidence from functional magnetic resonance imaging.

Authors:  Chandan J Vaidya; Silvia A Bunge; Nicole M Dudukovic; Christine A Zalecki; Glen R Elliott; John D E Gabrieli
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2005-09       Impact factor: 18.112

10.  Cue-induced cocaine craving: neuroanatomical specificity for drug users and drug stimuli.

Authors:  H Garavan; J Pankiewicz; A Bloom; J K Cho; L Sperry; T J Ross; B J Salmeron; R Risinger; D Kelley; E A Stein
Journal:  Am J Psychiatry       Date:  2000-11       Impact factor: 18.112

View more
  1 in total

1.  Decoding the role of the cerebellum in the early stages of reading acquisition.

Authors:  Hehui Li; Olga Kepinska; Jocelyn N Caballero; Leo Zekelman; Rebecca A Marks; Yuuko Uchikoshi; Ioulia Kovelman; Fumiko Hoeft
Journal:  Cortex       Date:  2021-05-08       Impact factor: 4.644

  1 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.