Literature DB >> 19457347

Comparative proteomic study of the venom of the piscivorous cone snail Conus consors.

Daniel Biass1, Sébastien Dutertre, Alain Gerbault, Jean-Louis Menou, Robin Offord, Philippe Favreau, Reto Stöcklin.   

Abstract

In the context of an exhaustive study of the piscivorous cone snail Conus consors, we performed an in-depth analysis of the intact molecular masses that can be detected in the animal's venom, using MALDI and ESI mass spectrometry. We clearly demonstrated that, for the venom of this species at least, it is essential to use both techniques in order to obtain the broadest data set of molecular masses. Only 20% of the total number of molecules detected were found in both mass lists. The two data sets were also compared in terms of mass range and relative hydrophobicity of the components detected in each. With a view to an extensive analysis of this venom's proteome, we further performed a comparative study by ESI-MS between venom obtained after classical dissection of the venom duct versus venom obtained by milking live animals. Surprisingly, although many fewer components were found in the milked venom than in the dissected venom, approximately 50% of those found had not been seen in the dissected venom. Several questions raised by these observations are discussed. With regards to the current knowledge of the cone snail venom composition, our results emphasize the complementary nature of the mass spectrometry methods and of the two techniques used in venom collection.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457347     DOI: 10.1016/j.jprot.2009.01.019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Proteomics        ISSN: 1874-3919            Impact factor:   4.044


  20 in total

1.  Molecular phylogeny, classification and evolution of conopeptides.

Authors:  N Puillandre; D Koua; P Favreau; B M Olivera; R Stöcklin
Journal:  J Mol Evol       Date:  2012-07-04       Impact factor: 2.395

2.  Proteomic analysis provides insights on venom processing in Conus textile.

Authors:  Lemmuel L Tayo; Bingwen Lu; Lourdes J Cruz; John R Yates
Journal:  J Proteome Res       Date:  2010-05-07       Impact factor: 4.466

3.  Various conotoxin diversifications revealed by a venomic study of Conus flavidus.

Authors:  Aiping Lu; Longjin Yang; Shaoqiong Xu; Chunguang Wang
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2013-10-14       Impact factor: 5.911

4.  Intraspecies variability and conopeptide profiling of the injected venom of Conus ermineus.

Authors:  Jose A Rivera-Ortiz; Herminsul Cano; Frank Marí
Journal:  Peptides       Date:  2010-11-30       Impact factor: 3.750

Review 5.  Natural products and ion channel pharmacology.

Authors:  Russell W Teichert; Baldomero M Olivera
Journal:  Future Med Chem       Date:  2010-05       Impact factor: 3.808

Review 6.  Linking neuroethology to the chemical biology of natural products: interactions between cone snails and their fish prey, a case study.

Authors:  Baldomero M Olivera; Shrinivasan Raghuraman; Eric W Schmidt; Helena Safavi-Hemami
Journal:  J Comp Physiol A Neuroethol Sens Neural Behav Physiol       Date:  2017-05-27       Impact factor: 1.836

7.  δ-Conotoxins synthesized using an acid-cleavable solubility tag approach reveal key structural determinants for NaV subtype selectivity.

Authors:  Steve Peigneur; Marianne Paolini-Bertrand; Hubert Gaertner; Daniel Biass; Aude Violette; Reto Stöcklin; Philippe Favreau; Jan Tytgat; Oliver Hartley
Journal:  J Biol Chem       Date:  2014-10-28       Impact factor: 5.157

8.  Deep venomics reveals the mechanism for expanded peptide diversity in cone snail venom.

Authors:  Sébastien Dutertre; Ai-hua Jin; Quentin Kaas; Alun Jones; Paul F Alewood; Richard J Lewis
Journal:  Mol Cell Proteomics       Date:  2012-11-14       Impact factor: 5.911

Review 9.  Why do we study animal toxins?

Authors:  Yun Zhang
Journal:  Dongwuxue Yanjiu       Date:  2015-07-18

10.  Molecular phylogeny and evolution of the cone snails (Gastropoda, Conoidea).

Authors:  N Puillandre; P Bouchet; T F Duda; S Kauferstein; A J Kohn; B M Olivera; M Watkins; C Meyer
Journal:  Mol Phylogenet Evol       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 4.286

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.