Literature DB >> 1945733

Predicting the future position of a moving target.

C Peterken1, B Brown, K Bowman.   

Abstract

Three experiments were conducted to examine the processes underlying the prediction of the future position of a moving target. A target moved horizontally across a computer screen at constant velocity, disappearing partway across the screen, and subjects responded when they estimated the target would have passed a point on the far side of the screen, had it continued on its path. The first experiment demonstrated that visual tracking of the target is not necessary for successful position estimation. In the second experiment, the time over which the prediction was made rather than the interval for which the target was visible, the distance over which the prediction was made, or the velocity of the target, was found to affect performance. Finally, performance was not affected when markers were placed parallel to the trajectory of the target; the presence of gratings which masked portions of the target's path did not affect subjects' performance. The previous literature suggests that the spatial interval over which predictions are made is the important variable; we find that temporal factors are the major determinants of prediction.

Mesh:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1945733     DOI: 10.1068/p200005

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Perception        ISSN: 0301-0066            Impact factor:   1.490


  14 in total

1.  Predicting the position of moving audiovisual stimuli.

Authors:  Steven L Prime; Laurence R Harris
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-03-30       Impact factor: 1.972

2.  Eye movements influence estimation of time-to-contact in prediction motion.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Robin Baures; Heiko Hecht; Nicolas Benguigui
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2010-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

3.  Predicting the path of a changing sound: velocity tracking and auditory continuity.

Authors:  Poppy A C Crum; Ervin R Hafter
Journal:  J Acoust Soc Am       Date:  2008-08       Impact factor: 1.840

4.  Temporal estimation with two moving objects: overt and covert pursuit.

Authors:  Robin Baurès; Simon J Bennett; Joe Causer
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2014-09-30       Impact factor: 1.972

5.  Time, change, and motion: the effects of stimulus movement on temporal perception.

Authors:  S W Brown
Journal:  Percept Psychophys       Date:  1995-01

6.  Delayed inhibition of an anticipatory action during motion extrapolation.

Authors:  Welber Marinovic; Campbell S Reid; Annaliese M Plooy; Stephan Riek; James R Tresilian
Journal:  Behav Brain Funct       Date:  2010-04-08       Impact factor: 3.759

Review 7.  The common rate control account of prediction motion.

Authors:  Alexis D J Makin
Journal:  Psychon Bull Rev       Date:  2018-10

8.  Ocular pursuit and the estimation of time-to-contact with accelerating objects in prediction motion are controlled independently based on first-order estimates.

Authors:  Nicolas Benguigui; Simon J Bennett
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2009-12-29       Impact factor: 1.972

9.  Combined smooth and saccadic ocular pursuit during the transient occlusion of a moving visual object.

Authors:  Simon J Bennett; Graham R Barnes
Journal:  Exp Brain Res       Date:  2005-09-23       Impact factor: 1.972

10.  Effects of smooth pursuit and second-order stimuli on visual motion prediction.

Authors:  Takeshi Miyamoto; Kosuke Numasawa; Yutaka Hirata; Akira Katoh; Kenichiro Miura; Seiji Ono
Journal:  Physiol Rep       Date:  2021-05
View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.