Literature DB >> 19457018

Reproductive interference determines persistence and exclusion in species interactions.

Shigeki Kishi1, Takayoshi Nishida, Yoshitaka Tsubaki.   

Abstract

1. Reproductive interference is a negative interspecific sexual interaction that adversely affects the fitness of males and females during reproductive process. Theoretical studies suggest that because reproductive interference is characterized by positive frequency dependence it is far more likely to cause species exclusion than the density dependence of resource competition. However, the respective contributions of resource competition and reproductive interference to species exclusion, which have been frequently observed in many competition studies, remain unclear. 2. We show that reproductive interference is a far more critical cause of species exclusion than resource competition in the competition between Callosobruchus bean weevil species. In competition experiments over several generations, we manipulated the initial relative abundance of the adzuki bean beetle, Callosobruchus chinensis, and the southern cowpea beetle, Callosobruchus maculatus. When the initial adult ratio of C. chinensis : C. maculatus were 6 : 2 and 4 : 4, C. chinensis excluded C. maculatus. However, when C. maculatus was four times more abundant than C. chinensis at the start, we observed the opposite outcome. 3. A behavioural experiment using adults of the two species revealed asymmetric reproductive interference. The fecundity and longevity of C. maculatus females, but not those of C. chinensis females, decreased when the females were kept with heterospecific males. Fecundities of females of both species decreased as the number of heterospecific males increased. In contrast, resource competition at the larval stage resulted in higher survival of C. maculatus than of C. chinensis. 4. These results suggest that the positive frequency-dependent effect of reproductive interference resulted in species exclusion, depending on the initial population ratio of the two species, and the asymmetry of the interference resulted in C. chinensis being dominant in this study, as in previous studies. Classical competition studies should be reviewed in light of this evidence for reproductive interference.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19457018     DOI: 10.1111/j.1365-2656.2009.01560.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Anim Ecol        ISSN: 0021-8790            Impact factor:   5.091


  22 in total

1.  The ecological and epidemiological consequences of reproductive interference between the vectors Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus.

Authors:  Robert S Paton; Michael B Bonsall
Journal:  J R Soc Interface       Date:  2019-07-31       Impact factor: 4.118

2.  Widespread evidence for interspecific mating between Aedes aegypti and Aedes albopictus (Diptera: Culicidae) in nature.

Authors:  I E Bargielowski; L P Lounibos; D Shin; C T Smartt; M C Carrasquilla; A Henry; J C Navarro; C Paupy; J A Dennett
Journal:  Infect Genet Evol       Date:  2015-08-18       Impact factor: 3.342

3.  Avoidance of interspecific mating in female Syrian hamsters is stronger toward familiar than toward unfamiliar heterospecific males.

Authors:  Javier delBarco-Trillo; Robert E Johnston
Journal:  Learn Behav       Date:  2011-09       Impact factor: 1.986

4.  Testing for reproductive interference in the population dynamics of two congeneric species of herbivorous mites.

Authors:  Y Sato; J M Alba; M W Sabelis
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2014-05-28       Impact factor: 3.821

5.  Reproductive isolation between Stigmaeopsis celarius and its sibling species sympatrically inhabiting bamboo (Pleioblastus spp.) plants.

Authors:  Younghae Chae; Nanako Yokoyama; Katsura Ito; Tatsuya Fukuda; Ryo Arakawa; Yan-Xuan Zhang; Yutaka Saito
Journal:  Exp Appl Acarol       Date:  2014-11-30       Impact factor: 2.132

6.  Workers select mates for queens: a possible mechanism of gene flow restriction between supercolonies of the invasive Argentine ant.

Authors:  Eiriki Sunamura; Sugihiko Hoshizaki; Hironori Sakamoto; Takeshi Fujii; Koji Nishisue; Shun Suzuki; Mamoru Terayama; Yukio Ishikawa; Sadahiro Tatsuki
Journal:  Naturwissenschaften       Date:  2011-03-22

7.  Reproductive interference between Rana dalmatina and Rana temporaria affects reproductive success in natural populations.

Authors:  Attila Hettyey; Balázs Vági; Tibor Kovács; János Ujszegi; Patrik Katona; Márk Szederkényi; Peter B Pearman; Matteo Griggio; Herbert Hoi
Journal:  Oecologia       Date:  2014-08-20       Impact factor: 3.225

Review 8.  Development and evolution of character displacement.

Authors:  David W Pfennig; Karin S Pfennig
Journal:  Ann N Y Acad Sci       Date:  2012-01-18       Impact factor: 5.691

9.  Reproductive interference and fecundity affect competitive interactions of sibling species with low mating barriers: experimental and theoretical evidence.

Authors:  M Gebiola; S E Kelly; L Velten; R Zug; P Hammerstein; M Giorgini; M S Hunter
Journal:  Heredity (Edinb)       Date:  2017-09-13       Impact factor: 3.821

10.  Frequency-dependent fitness and reproductive dynamics contribute to habitat segregation in sympatric jewelflowers.

Authors:  Kyle Christie; Sharon Y Strauss
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2020-05-13       Impact factor: 5.349

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.