Literature DB >> 19456263

Evolution of predator and prey movement into sink habitats.

Sebastian J Schreiber1, Evan Saltzman.   

Abstract

Mathematical models of predator-prey interactions in a patchy landscape are used to explore the evolution of dispersal into sink habitats. When evolution proceeds at a single trophic level (i.e., either prey or predator disperses), three evolutionary outcomes are observed. If predator-prey dynamics are stable in source habitats, then there is an evolutionarily stable strategy (ESS) corresponding to sedentary phenotypes residing in source habitats. If predator-prey dynamics are sufficiently unstable, then either an ESS corresponding to dispersive phenotypes or an evolutionarily stable coalition (ESC) between dispersive and sedentary phenotypes emerges. Dispersive phenotypes playing an ESS persist despite exhibiting, on average, a negative per capita growth rate in all habitats. ESCs occur if dispersal into sink habitats can stabilize the predator-prey interactions. When evolution proceeds at both trophic levels, any combination of monomorphic or dimorphic phenotypes at one or both trophic levels is observed. Coevolution is largely top-down driven. At low predator mortality rates in sink habitats, evolution of predator movement into sink habitats forestalls evolution of prey movement into sink habitats. Only at intermediate mortality rates is there selection for predator and prey movement. Our results also illustrate an evolutionary paradox of enrichment, in which enriching source habitats can reduce phenotypic diversity.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19456263     DOI: 10.1086/599296

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Am Nat        ISSN: 0003-0147            Impact factor:   3.926


  4 in total

1.  Interactive effects of temporal correlations, spatial heterogeneity and dispersal on population persistence.

Authors:  Sebastian J Schreiber
Journal:  Proc Biol Sci       Date:  2010-02-17       Impact factor: 5.349

2.  Stochastic population growth in spatially heterogeneous environments.

Authors:  Steven N Evans; Peter L Ralph; Sebastian J Schreiber; Arnab Sen
Journal:  J Math Biol       Date:  2012-03-18       Impact factor: 2.259

3.  Inter-annual variability influences the eco-evolutionary dynamics of range-shifting.

Authors:  Roslyn C Henry; Greta Bocedi; Calvin Dytham; Justin M J Travis
Journal:  PeerJ       Date:  2014-01-02       Impact factor: 2.984

4.  Evolution of predator dispersal in relation to spatio-temporal prey dynamics: how not to get stuck in the wrong place!

Authors:  Justin M J Travis; Stephen C F Palmer; Steven Coyne; Alexandre Millon; Xavier Lambin
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2013-02-11       Impact factor: 3.240

  4 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.