Literature DB >> 1945605

Differences in antibody response to whole-cell pertussis vaccines.

K M Edwards1, M D Decker, N A Halsey, B A Koblin, T Townsend, B Auerbach, D T Karzon.   

Abstract

It has been assumed that whole-cell pertussis vaccines (WCVs) commercially distributed in the United States are of comparable immunogenicity, as all must comply with established standards for licensure. However, we have recently noted significant differences in antibody responses between groups of infants receiving the two WCVs commercially available in the United States. In separate studies performed concurrently under similar protocols at Vanderbilt and Johns Hopkins universities, infants were randomized to receive either an acellular pertussis vaccine or WCV. The acellular pertussis vaccine used at the two sites was identical, but the WCVs were from different manufacturers. Antibody responses to acellular pertussis vaccine did not differ between the two studies; responses to WCV differed dramatically, with infants receiving the Lederle WCV producing a 46-fold increase in antibody to pertussis toxin, compared with a 2.4-fold increase for infants receiving the Connaught WCV (P = .00003). Evaluation of other comparative data sets that were available provided further support for the conclusion that the two commercially available WCVs consistently differed in their ability to induce antibody to pertussis toxin. These findings have important implications for the design and interpretation of clinical trials comparing acellular and WCV products.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Substances:

Year:  1991        PMID: 1945605

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Pediatrics        ISSN: 0031-4005            Impact factor:   7.124


  10 in total

1.  Comparative safety and immunogenicity of an acellular versus whole-cell pertussis component of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccines in Senegalese infants.

Authors:  F Simondon; A Yam; J Y Gagnepain; S Wassilak; B Danve; M Cadoz
Journal:  Eur J Clin Microbiol Infect Dis       Date:  1996-12       Impact factor: 3.267

Review 2.  Pertussis vaccines--1993.

Authors:  H J Schmitt; S Wagner
Journal:  Eur J Pediatr       Date:  1993-06       Impact factor: 3.183

3.  Combined diphtheria, tetanus, pertussis, and Haemophilus influenzae type b vaccines for primary immunisation.

Authors:  F Bell; A Martin; C Blondeau; C Thornton; J Chaplais; A Finn
Journal:  Arch Dis Child       Date:  1996-10       Impact factor: 3.791

4.  Serum antibodies to diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine components in Argentine children.

Authors:  M Pasetti; P Eriksson; F Ferrero; M Manghi
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1997 Nov-Dec       Impact factor: 3.553

Review 5.  A cellular pertussis vaccine (Infanrix-DTPa; SB-3). A review of its immunogenicity, protective efficacy and tolerability in the prevention of Bordetella pertussis infection.

Authors:  S S Patel; A J Wagstaff
Journal:  Drugs       Date:  1996-08       Impact factor: 9.546

6.  Serum antibodies to the components of diphtheria-tetanus-pertussis vaccine in Polish children related to vaccination status.

Authors:  E Torbicka; T Lagergård; B Trollfors
Journal:  Infection       Date:  1995 Jul-Aug       Impact factor: 3.553

7.  Human antibody response to the B oligomer of pertussis toxin.

Authors:  F Lynn; W N Burnette; G R Siber; J L Arciniega
Journal:  Clin Diagn Lab Immunol       Date:  1994-11

Review 8.  Pertussis: Microbiology, Disease, Treatment, and Prevention.

Authors:  Paul E Kilgore; Abdulbaset M Salim; Marcus J Zervos; Heinz-Josef Schmitt
Journal:  Clin Microbiol Rev       Date:  2016-07       Impact factor: 26.132

9.  Effect of maternal Tdap on infant antibody response to a primary vaccination series with whole cell pertussis vaccine in São Paulo, Brazil.

Authors:  Lourdes R A Vaz-de-Lima; Ana Paula S Sato; Lucia C Pawloski; Eder G Fernandes; Gowrisankar Rajam; Helena K Sato; Divya Patel; Han Li; Euclides A de Castilho; Maria Lucia Tondella; Jarad Schiffer
Journal:  Vaccine X       Date:  2021-02-16

Review 10.  Whole-Cell and Acellular Pertussis Vaccine: Reflections on Efficacy.

Authors:  Mohammad Alghounaim; Zainab Alsaffar; Abdulla Alfraij; Saadoun Bin-Hasan; Entesar Hussain
Journal:  Med Princ Pract       Date:  2022-06-13       Impact factor: 2.132

  10 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.