Literature DB >> 19455882

Clinical microsystems and the NHS: a sustainable method for improvement?

Iestyn Williams1, Helen Dickinson, Suzanne Robinson, Clare Allen.   

Abstract

PURPOSE: The purpose of this paper is to evaluate the claims made for the clinical microsystems approach of healthcare improvement within an English NHS context. DESIGN/METHODOLOGY/APPROACH: The research adopted a Realistic Evaluation approach to examine a series of pilot clinical microsystems sites to determine what worked for whom, when and within what circumstances. Interviews and group discussions were used to collect qualitative data, whist quantitative outcome data was also collected within each of the sites. Data was triangulated to produce case studies for each of the sites.
FINDINGS: The research concurred with many of the claims for clinical microsystems, particularly that democratic, consensual approaches to change and improvement can be better received than externally derived initiatives with imposed targets. The clinical microsystem approach emphasises identifying and nurturing strengths--of both teams and individuals--and this reinforced these positive aspects. The case study sites demonstrated higher staff morale, empowerment, commitment and clarity of purpose. To a lesser extent the research also indicated an enhanced predisposition towards improvement and innovation and a seemingly embedded sense of improvement as an ongoing (if essentially episodic) process. RESEARCH LIMITATIONS/IMPLICATIONS: The evaluation was limited in terms of the numbers of case study sites that it was able to incorporate. This sample represented sites of different sizes, coverage of primary, secondary and tertiary care and those reporting more and less positive experiences of the clinical microsystems approach--but any findings may be limited in their generaliseability and further studies may be needed to test out the relevance of these findings in wider settings. PRACTICAL IMPLICATIONS: Future microsystem programmes will need to address components of patient involvement and process/outcome monitoring if the broader legitimacy of the approach is to be cemented and enhanced. In particular, the importance of strong data collection in achieving "high performing" status is emphasised. ORIGINALITY/VALUE: There is currently no other empirical studies within the academic literature which investigate the value of the clinical microsystems approach to an English NHS context.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19455882     DOI: 10.1108/14777260910942597

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Health Organ Manag        ISSN: 1477-7266


  7 in total

1.  The care unit in nursing home research: evidence in support of a definition.

Authors:  Carole A Estabrooks; Debra G Morgan; Janet E Squires; Anne-Marie Boström; Susan E Slaughter; Greta G Cummings; Peter G Norton
Journal:  BMC Med Res Methodol       Date:  2011-04-14       Impact factor: 4.615

2.  Individual and organizational predictors of health care aide job satisfaction in long term care.

Authors:  Stephanie A Chamberlain; Matthias Hoben; Janet E Squires; Carole A Estabrooks
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2016-10-13       Impact factor: 2.655

3.  SCOPEOUT: sustainability and spread of quality improvement activities in long-term care- a mixed methods approach.

Authors:  Lisa A Cranley; Matthias Hoben; Jasper Yeung; Carole A Estabrooks; Peter G Norton; Adrian Wagg
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-03-12       Impact factor: 2.655

4.  Improving Nursing Home Care through Feedback On PerfoRMance Data (INFORM): Protocol for a cluster-randomized trial.

Authors:  Matthias Hoben; Peter G Norton; Liane R Ginsburg; Ruth A Anderson; Greta G Cummings; Holly J Lanham; Janet E Squires; Deanne Taylor; Adrian S Wagg; Carole A Estabrooks
Journal:  Trials       Date:  2017-01-10       Impact factor: 2.279

5.  Developing primary care teams prepared to improve quality: a mixed-methods evaluation and lessons learned from implementing a microsystems approach.

Authors:  Nancy Pandhi; Sally Kraft; Stephanie Berkson; Sarah Davis; Sandra Kamnetz; Steven Koslov; Elizabeth Trowbridge; William Caplan
Journal:  BMC Health Serv Res       Date:  2018-11-09       Impact factor: 2.655

6.  Impact of the Enhanced Universal Support Offer to Care Homes during COVID-19 in the UK: Evaluation using appreciative inquiry.

Authors:  Sally Fowler-Davis; Rachel Cholerton; Mandy Philbin; Kathy Clark; Gill Hunt
Journal:  Health Soc Care Community       Date:  2021-10-25

7.  Facility versus unit level reporting of quality indicators in nursing homes when performance monitoring is the goal.

Authors:  Peter G Norton; Michael Murray; Malcolm B Doupe; Greta G Cummings; Jeff W Poss; Janet E Squires; Gary F Teare; Carole A Estabrooks
Journal:  BMJ Open       Date:  2014-02-12       Impact factor: 2.692

  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.