OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Patient Care Monitor (PCM1.0) Acute Distress and Despair normalized T scores as indicators of a diagnosis of Major Depression according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID). METHODS: Subjects were 21 adult cancer patients identified by treating community oncologists as having significant emotional distress matched on age, cancer type, treatment history, and sex to 21 patients not having significant distress. All completed e/tablet PCM 1.0 and SCID administered by trained interviewers. Unweighted kappa and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were used to assess scale properties. RESULTS: Agreement between SCID Major Depression and Acute Distress and Despair (T> or =65) were kappa=0.751 and 0.755, respectively. ROC area under the curve values for these two scales were 0.967 (SE+/-0.03) and 0.942 (SE+/-0.03), respectively, with optimal cut points of T=61 and 63, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Under conditions of preselected extreme groups, PCM 1.0 Acute Distress and Despair T scores are reasonable screening indicators of clinical depression in cancer patients. PCM 1.0 provides an efficient method for point-of-care screening of depression in community oncology clinics. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
OBJECTIVE: To evaluate the Patient Care Monitor (PCM1.0) Acute Distress and Despair normalized T scores as indicators of a diagnosis of Major Depression according to the Structured Clinical Interview for DSM-IV Axis I Disorders (SCID). METHODS: Subjects were 21 adult cancerpatients identified by treating community oncologists as having significant emotional distress matched on age, cancer type, treatment history, and sex to 21 patients not having significant distress. All completed e/tablet PCM 1.0 and SCID administered by trained interviewers. Unweighted kappa and receiver operating characteristics (ROC) analyses were used to assess scale properties. RESULTS: Agreement between SCID Major Depression and Acute Distress and Despair (T> or =65) were kappa=0.751 and 0.755, respectively. ROC area under the curve values for these two scales were 0.967 (SE+/-0.03) and 0.942 (SE+/-0.03), respectively, with optimal cut points of T=61 and 63, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Under conditions of preselected extreme groups, PCM 1.0 Acute Distress and Despair T scores are reasonable screening indicators of clinical depression in cancerpatients. PCM 1.0 provides an efficient method for point-of-care screening of depression in community oncology clinics. Copyright 2009 John Wiley & Sons, Ltd.
Authors: Kellie J Ryan; Karen E Skinner; Ancilla W Fernandes; Rajeshwari S Punekar; Melissa Pavilack; Mark S Walker; Noam A VanderWalde Journal: Med Oncol Date: 2019-01-31 Impact factor: 3.064
Authors: Mark S Walker; Edward J Stepanski; Carolina Reyes; Sacha Satram-Hoang; Arthur C Houts; Lee S Schwartzberg Journal: Ther Adv Hematol Date: 2011-06
Authors: Mark S Walker; Murad Hasan; Yeun Mi Yim; Elaine Yu; Edward J Stepanski; Lee S Schwartzberg Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2011-06-20 Impact factor: 3.186
Authors: Anna Meijer; Michelle Roseman; Katherine Milette; James C Coyne; Michael E Stefanek; Roy C Ziegelstein; Erin Arthurs; Allison Leavens; Steven C Palmer; Donna E Stewart; Peter de Jonge; Brett D Thombs Journal: PLoS One Date: 2011-11-14 Impact factor: 3.240
Authors: Himani Aggarwal; Rajeshwari S Punekar; Li Li; Gebra Cuyun Carter; Mark S Walker Journal: Health Qual Life Outcomes Date: 2020-06-22 Impact factor: 3.186