Literature DB >> 19455286

[Open appendectomy. When do we still need it?].

C Reissfelder1, B Mc Cafferty, M von Frankenberg.   

Abstract

Acute appendicitis is the most common emergency visceral surgical procedure in Germany with 130,000 appendectomies. The question of which operational procedure should be used must therefore be discussed at regular intervals. In many centers of minimal invasive surgery, laparoscopic appendectomy (LA) is the standard procedure. Nearly 30 years after introduction of LA, it is believed that open appendectomy (OA) is needed only on rare occasions, but the actual percentage of OAs carried out in 2006 was 46% of all appendectomies. This high percentage documents that OA is still the standard procedure in many German hospitals. A review of the literature shows that there are still some situations in which OA is superior to LA. Infants younger than 5 years old have a more difficult basic requirement for LA due to the small abdominal cavity, therefore OA is the procedure of choice in most cases. During pregnancy OA has a lower risk for the fetus than LA. Cost analyses show that OA is less expensive for the hospital in material costs, whereas LA is the better economic choice due to an earlier return to work. In summary, there are only marginal differences between the two procedures since both offer a fast patient recovery. Advantages in favor of both LA and OA exist in subgroup analyses and the possible subgroups that can benefit from OA are discussed in this article.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19455286     DOI: 10.1007/s00104-009-1683-2

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Chirurg        ISSN: 0009-4722            Impact factor:   0.955


  30 in total

1.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective, randomized, double-blind study.

Authors:  Namir Katkhouda; Rodney J Mason; Shirin Towfigh
Journal:  Adv Surg       Date:  2006

2.  [Economic observations on the operative treatment of acute appendicitis].

Authors:  J Jonas; R Bähr
Journal:  Zentralbl Chir       Date:  2007-04       Impact factor: 0.942

3.  Causes of arterial hypertension and splachnic ischemia during acute elevations in intra-abdominal pressure with CO2 pneumoperitoneum: a complex central nervous system mediated response.

Authors:  M Ben-Haim; R J Rosenthal
Journal:  Int J Colorectal Dis       Date:  1999-11       Impact factor: 2.571

4.  Laparoscopic appendicectomy: a trainee's perspective.

Authors:  A J Botha; C Elton; E E Moore; P Sauven
Journal:  Ann R Coll Surg Engl       Date:  1995-07       Impact factor: 1.891

5.  A prospective randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy: Clinical and economic analyses.

Authors:  K H Long; M P Bannon; S P Zietlow; E R Helgeson; W S Harmsen; C D Smith; D M Ilstrup; Y Baerga-Varela; M G Sarr
Journal:  Surgery       Date:  2001-04       Impact factor: 3.982

Review 6.  Laparoscopic versus open appendicectomy in pregnancy: a systematic review.

Authors:  Colin A Walsh; Tjun Tang; Stewart R Walsh
Journal:  Int J Surg       Date:  2008-02-01       Impact factor: 6.071

7.  The surgeon on call is a strong factor determining the use of a laparoscopic approach for appendectomy.

Authors:  P Cervini; L C Smith; D R Urbach
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2002-07-29       Impact factor: 4.584

Review 8.  Laparoscopic appendectomy for complicated appendicitis: an evaluation of postoperative factors.

Authors:  C G Ball; J B Kortbeek; A W Kirkpatrick; P Mitchell
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2004-04-21       Impact factor: 4.584

9.  A prospective, randomized comparison of laparoscopic appendectomy with open appendectomy. Laparoscopic Appendectomy Study Group.

Authors:  A E Ortega; J G Hunter; J H Peters; L L Swanstrom; B Schirmer
Journal:  Am J Surg       Date:  1995-02       Impact factor: 2.565

10.  Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: what is the real difference? Results of a prospective randomized double-blinded trial.

Authors:  R C Ignacio; R Burke; D Spencer; C Bissell; C Dorsainvil; P A Lucha
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2003-12-29       Impact factor: 4.584

View more
  9 in total

1.  Trend, variability, and outcome of open vs. laparoscopic appendectomy based on a large administrative database.

Authors:  Mario Saia; Alessandra Buja; Tatjana Baldovin; Giampietro Callegaro; Paolo Sandonà; Domenico Mantoan; Vincenzo Baldo
Journal:  Surg Endosc       Date:  2012-02-21       Impact factor: 4.584

2.  [Appendectomy in surgical residency. What has changed over the past 10 years?].

Authors:  T Huber; M Paschold; F Bartsch; H Lang; W Kneist
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2016-04       Impact factor: 0.955

3.  Is the use of endoloops safe and efficient for the closure of the appendicular stump in complicated and uncomplicated acute appendicitis?

Authors:  Virginia Durán Muñoz-Cruzado; Gregorio Anguiano-Diaz; Luis Tallón Aguilar; José Tinoco González; Alejandro Sánchez Arteaga; Daniel Aparicio Sánchez; Felipe Pareja Ciuró; Javier Padillo Ruiz
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2021-01-07       Impact factor: 3.445

4.  Cost-effectiveness of open versus laparoscopic appendectomy: a multilevel approach with propensity score matching.

Authors:  Laura Haas; Tom Stargardt; Jonas Schreyoegg
Journal:  Eur J Health Econ       Date:  2011-10-08

5.  Laparoscopic appendectomy using a single polymeric clip to close the appendicular stump.

Authors:  Lars Ivo Partecke; Wolfram Kessler; Wolfram von Bernstorff; Stephan Diedrich; Claus-Dieter Heidecke; Maciej Patrzyk
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2010-06-26       Impact factor: 3.445

6.  [Pediatric appendicitis : Open or laparoscopic appendicectomy in a specialized visceral surgical clinic?].

Authors:  M Gerstorfer; U Clauer; J Kistler; J Roder
Journal:  Chirurg       Date:  2011-11       Impact factor: 0.955

7.  Unexpected findings on laparoscopy for suspected acute appendicitis: a pro for laparoscopic appendectomy as the standard procedure for acute appendicitis.

Authors:  Lars Ivo Partecke; Wolfram von Bernstorff; Annette Karrasch; Katharina Cziupka; Anne Glitsch; Albrecht Stier; Claus Dieter Heidecke; Jürgen Tepel
Journal:  Langenbecks Arch Surg       Date:  2009-11-19       Impact factor: 3.445

8.  Laparoscopic-assisted single-port appendectomy in children: it is a safe and cost-effective alternative to conventional laparoscopic techniques?

Authors:  Sergio B Sesia; Frank-Martin Haecker
Journal:  Minim Invasive Surg       Date:  2013-12-08

Review 9.  The evolution of the appendectomy: from open to laparoscopic to single incision.

Authors:  Noah J Switzer; Richdeep S Gill; Shahzeer Karmali
Journal:  Scientifica (Cairo)       Date:  2012-05-27
  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.