Literature DB >> 19455079

The English National Chlamydia Screening Programme: variations in positivity in 2007/2008.

Ian Simms1, Alireza Talebi, Johanna Rhia, Paddy Horner, Rebecca S French, Randall Sarah, Mary Macintosh.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The purpose of this study was to examine variation in positivity within the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme during 2007/2008.
METHODS: Data were analyzed using multivariable logistic regression. The outcome measure was positivity. Funnel plots were used to explore variation in positivity according to screening volume.
RESULTS: Three hundred and thirty-four thousand nine hundred and two screening tests were done, 29% of which were in men. Overall positivity was 7.6% in men and 9.3% in women. For men, positivity increased rapidly to plateau from ages 19 to 24. For women, rates peaked at 18 years-those aged 21 being at the same risk of chlamydial infection as 16-year-olds. For men and women, positivity was generally higher for those of black or mixed ethnicity compared with whites, whereas Asians were at lower risk. Similarly, risk of infection for men and women varied by screening venue. Multivariable analysis showed that, for men and women positivity varied significantly with age, ethnicity, screening venue attended, whether the young people had had a new sexual partner in the past 3 months, and whether the patient had had 2 or more sexual partners in the past year. Positivity did not vary significantly with implementation phase.
CONCLUSIONS: This is the largest description of testing for Chlamydia trachomatis in healthcare and nonhealthcare settings outside Genitourinary Medicine clinics in England and allowed a detailed analysis of positivity by age and ethnic group. Considerable heterogeneity exists and local health service commissioners need to ensure that the implementation of chlamydial screening reflects these differences.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19455079     DOI: 10.1097/OLQ.0b013e3181a2aab9

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Sex Transm Dis        ISSN: 0148-5717            Impact factor:   2.830


  9 in total

1.  Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence, genotype distribution and identification of the new Swedish variant in Southern Germany.

Authors:  N Fieser; U Simnacher; Y Tausch; S Werner-Belak; S Ladenburger-Strauss; H von Baum; U Reischl; A Essig
Journal:  Infection       Date:  2012-08-02       Impact factor: 3.553

2.  Assessment of best single sample for finding chlamydia in women with and without symptoms: a diagnostic test study.

Authors:  Sarah A Schoeman; Catherine M W Stewart; Russell A Booth; Susan D Smith; Mark H Wilcox; Janet D Wilson
Journal:  BMJ       Date:  2012-12-12

3.  Who is being tested by the English National Chlamydia Screening Programme? A comparison with national probability survey data.

Authors:  Johanna Riha; Catherine H Mercer; Kate Soldan; Clare E French; Mary Macintosh
Journal:  Sex Transm Infect       Date:  2011-03-22       Impact factor: 3.519

4.  Should young people be paid for getting tested? A national comparative study to evaluate patient financial incentives for chlamydia screening.

Authors:  Dominik Zenner; Darko Molinar; Tom Nichols; Johanna Riha; Mary Macintosh; Anthony Nardone
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2012-04-02       Impact factor: 3.295

5.  Not so different after all? Comparing patients attending general practice-based locally enhanced services for sexual health with patients attending genitourinary medicine.

Authors:  C H Mercer; C R H Aicken; J A Cassell; V Hartnell; L Davies; J Ryan; F Keane
Journal:  Int J STD AIDS       Date:  2013-02       Impact factor: 1.359

6.  Understanding the burden of bacterial sexually transmitted infections and Trichomonas vaginalis among black Caribbeans in the United Kingdom: Findings from a systematic review.

Authors:  Sonali Wayal; Catherine R H Aicken; Catherine Griffiths; Paula B Blomquist; Gwenda Hughes; Catherine H Mercer
Journal:  PLoS One       Date:  2018-12-07       Impact factor: 3.240

7.  Discrepancies between observed data and predictions from mathematical modelling of the impact of screening interventions on Chlamydia trachomatis prevalence.

Authors:  Joost Smid; Christian L Althaus; Nicola Low
Journal:  Sci Rep       Date:  2019-05-17       Impact factor: 4.379

8.  Do sexual health campaigns work? An outcome evaluation of a media campaign to increase chlamydia testing among young people aged 15-24 in England.

Authors:  Maya Gobin; Neville Verlander; Carla Maurici; Angie Bone; Anthony Nardone
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2013-05-17       Impact factor: 3.295

Review 9.  Socioeconomic factors and other sources of variation in the prevalence of genital chlamydia infections: A systematic review and meta-analysis.

Authors:  Joanna Crichton; Matthew Hickman; Rona Campbell; Harriet Batista-Ferrer; John Macleod
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2015-07-30       Impact factor: 3.295

  9 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.