OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of suffering in a spouse on prevalent and incident psychiatric (depression) and physical morbidity (cardiovascular disease [CVD]) in their partner, controlling for known risk factors for depression and CVD. DESIGN: Descriptive longitudinal study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,330 older married couples enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a large epidemiologic study of the elderly. MEASUREMENTS: Predictor variables were physical, psychological, and existential/spiritual indicators of suffering. Primary outcomes were prevalent and incident depression and CVD. RESULTS: Controlling for known risk factors for depression, the authors found a dose-response relationship between suffering in a spouse and concurrent depression in their partner as well as a relationship between suffering and the partner's future risk for depression. With respect to CVD, and controlling for subclinical CVD at baseline, husbands whose wives reported high levels of suffering also had higher rates of prevalent CVD, but there were no significant associations between wives suffering and husbands incident CVD. There were no associations between husbands' suffering and wives' prevalent or incident CVD. CONCLUSION: Exposure to spousal suffering is an independent and unique source of distress in married couples that contributes to psychiatric and physical morbidity. More attention should be paid to the interpersonal effects of suffering in married couples and to its role in contributing to morbidity.
OBJECTIVES: To assess the effects of suffering in a spouse on prevalent and incident psychiatric (depression) and physical morbidity (cardiovascular disease [CVD]) in their partner, controlling for known risk factors for depression and CVD. DESIGN: Descriptive longitudinal study. PARTICIPANTS: A total of 1,330 older married couples enrolled in the Cardiovascular Health Study, a large epidemiologic study of the elderly. MEASUREMENTS: Predictor variables were physical, psychological, and existential/spiritual indicators of suffering. Primary outcomes were prevalent and incident depression and CVD. RESULTS: Controlling for known risk factors for depression, the authors found a dose-response relationship between suffering in a spouse and concurrent depression in their partner as well as a relationship between suffering and the partner's future risk for depression. With respect to CVD, and controlling for subclinical CVD at baseline, husbands whose wives reported high levels of suffering also had higher rates of prevalent CVD, but there were no significant associations between wives suffering and husbands incident CVD. There were no associations between husbands' suffering and wives' prevalent or incident CVD. CONCLUSION: Exposure to spousal suffering is an independent and unique source of distress in married couples that contributes to psychiatric and physical morbidity. More attention should be paid to the interpersonal effects of suffering in married couples and to its role in contributing to morbidity.
Authors: Peter P Vitaliano; James M Scanlan; Jianping Zhang; Margaret V Savage; Irl B Hirsch; Ilene C Siegler Journal: Psychosom Med Date: 2002 May-Jun Impact factor: 4.312
Authors: Francis J Keefe; Isaac Lipkus; John C Lefebvre; Herbert Hurwitz; Elizabeth Clipp; Jill Smith; Laura Porter Journal: Pain Date: 2003-05 Impact factor: 6.961
Authors: Richard Schulz; Joan K Monin; Sara J Czaja; Jennifer H Lingler; Scott R Beach; Lynn M Martire; Angela Dodds; Randy S Hebert; Bozena Zdaniuk; Thomas B Cook Journal: Gerontologist Date: 2010-05-17
Authors: Joan K Monin; Richard Schulz; Lynn M Martire; J Richard Jennings; Jennifer Hagerty Lingler; Martin S Greenberg Journal: J Gerontol B Psychol Sci Soc Sci Date: 2010-01-12 Impact factor: 4.077
Authors: Katherine A Ornstein; Melissa M Garrido; Albert L Siu; Evan Bollens-Lund; Kenneth M Langa; Amy S Kelley Journal: Health Serv Res Date: 2018-02-28 Impact factor: 3.402