Literature DB >> 19454782

Target-tracking deliveries on an Elekta linac: a feasibility study.

D McQuaid1, M Partridge, J R Symonds-Tayler, P M Evans, S Webb.   

Abstract

A target-tracking, intensity-modulated delivery on an Elekta MLCi system was assessed by film measurement with a simulated target-motion trajectory. A toroidally shaped idealized target surrounding an organ at risk necessitating multiple field segments to irradiate the target and spare the organ at risk was defined in a solid-water phantom. The phantom was programmed to move following a reproducible 2D elliptical trajectory in the beam's-eye view with a period of 10 s. Static and target-tracking treatments were planned for delivery on a standard Elekta Precise series linac with integrated MLCi system. Dose was delivered in three ways: (i) a static treatment to a static phantom, (ii) a static treatment to a moving phantom and (iii) a target-tracking treatment to a moving phantom. The dose delivered was assessed by film measurement on the central plane through the target and organ at risk. The target dose blurring was quantified by the standard deviation of the dose to the target which was evaluated as 2.8% for the static treatment to the static phantom, 7.2% for the static treatment to the moving phantom and 2.6% for the tracking treatment to the moving phantom. The mean organ-at-risk dose was 38.2%, 54.0% and 38.2% of the prescription dose for each delivery case. We have therefore shown that the linac is capable of delivering target-tracking fields with MLCs for the target trajectories tested.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19454782     DOI: 10.1088/0031-9155/54/11/019

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Phys Med Biol        ISSN: 0031-9155            Impact factor:   3.609


  7 in total

1.  Target tracking using DMLC for volumetric modulated arc therapy: a simulation study.

Authors:  Baozhou Sun; Dharanipathy Rangaraj; Lech Papiez; Swetha Oddiraju; Deshan Yang; H Harold Li
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2010-12       Impact factor: 4.071

2.  Planning 4D intensity-modulated arc therapy for tumor tracking with a multileaf collimator.

Authors:  Ying Niu; Gregory T Betzel; Xiaocheng Yang; Minzhi Gui; William C Parke; Byongyong Yi; Cedric X Yu
Journal:  Phys Med Biol       Date:  2017-01-04       Impact factor: 3.609

3.  Real time 4D IMRT treatment planning based on a dynamic virtual patient model: proof of concept.

Authors:  Bingqi Guo; X George Xu; Chengyu Shi
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2011-05       Impact factor: 4.071

4.  Using an external surrogate for predictor model training in real-time motion management of lung tumors.

Authors:  Joerg Rottmann; Ross Berbeco
Journal:  Med Phys       Date:  2014-12       Impact factor: 4.071

5.  Effect of MLC tracking latency on conformal volumetric modulated arc therapy (VMAT) plans in 4D stereotactic lung treatment.

Authors:  James L Bedford; Martin F Fast; Simeon Nill; Fiona M A McDonald; Merina Ahmed; Vibeke N Hansen; Uwe Oelfke
Journal:  Radiother Oncol       Date:  2015-08-13       Impact factor: 6.280

6.  Effects of collimator angle, couch angle, and starting phase on motion-tracking dynamic conformal arc therapy (4D DCAT).

Authors:  Zhengzheng Xu; Rutao Yao; Matthew B Podgorsak; Iris Z Wang
Journal:  J Appl Clin Med Phys       Date:  2017-07-21       Impact factor: 2.102

Review 7.  Magnitude, Impact, and Management of Respiration-induced Target Motion in Radiotherapy Treatment: A Comprehensive Review.

Authors:  S A Yoganathan; K J Maria Das; Arpita Agarwal; Shaleen Kumar
Journal:  J Med Phys       Date:  2017 Jul-Sep
  7 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.