Literature DB >> 19454548

Evaluation of the pulse pressure variation index as a predictor of fluid responsiveness during orthotopic liver transplantation.

G Gouvêa1, R Diaz, L Auler, R Toledo, J M Martinho.   

Abstract

BACKGROUND: The pulse pressure variation (PPV) index has been shown to be a reliable predictor of fluid responsiveness (FR) in a variety of clinical settings. However, it has not been formally evaluated in the setting of orthotopic liver transplantation (OLT).
METHODS: Fifteen (n=15) patients undergoing OLT were enrolled in this study. All patients were monitored with a modified pulmonary artery catheter which measured the cardiac output on a semi-continuous basis. A fluid challenge (FC) with 350 ml of colloid was attempted during the following stages of surgery: hepatectomy (TH), anhepatic phase (TA), early post-reperfusion [(TE)--during the first 30 min], late post-reperfusion [(TL)--after hepatic artery anastomosis], and at the beginning of abdominal closure (TC). PPV and stroke volume index (SVI) were recorded at baseline and 5 min after the FC. Each individual FC which raised the SVI more than 10% from baseline was classified as responsive (R); otherwise, it was considered non-responsive (NR).
RESULTS: Forty-one FCs were performed, with 14 (34%) classified as responsive and 27 (66%) as non-responsive. The baseline PPV did not differ significantly between the R and NR groups, showing considerable overlap of its values throughout the procedure [R vs NR; TH: 20% (inter-quartile range 7-32) vs 7% (5-14); TA: 10% (7-14) vs 19% (12-21), and TE+TL: 7% (5-11) vs 9% (7-16)].
CONCLUSIONS: Under the conditions of this study, the PPV index was not shown to be a reliable predictor of FR during OLT. Further studies are warranted to elucidate the role of this and other dynamic indexes in this specific setting.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19454548     DOI: 10.1093/bja/aep123

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Br J Anaesth        ISSN: 0007-0912            Impact factor:   9.166


  13 in total

1.  Visual estimation of pulse pressure variation is not reliable: a randomized simulation study.

Authors:  Joseph Rinehart; Tanzeem Islam; Rob Boud; Allison Nguyen; Brenton Alexander; Cecilia Canales; Maxime Cannesson
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2012-04-11       Impact factor: 2.502

2.  What is your strategy for fluid management?

Authors:  Young-Cheol Woo
Journal:  Korean J Anesthesiol       Date:  2012-04-23

3.  Validation of electrical velocimetry in resuscitation of patients undergoing liver transplantation. Observational study.

Authors:  Ahmed M Mukhtar; Mohamed Elayashy; Amr H Sayed; Gihan M Obaya; Akram A Eladawy; Mai A Ali; Hisham M Dahab; Dina Z Khalaf; Mostafa A Mohamed; Amr H Elfouly; Gad M Behairy; Amr A Abdelaal
Journal:  J Clin Monit Comput       Date:  2019-04-19       Impact factor: 2.502

Review 4.  Massive haemorrhage in liver transplantation: Consequences, prediction and management.

Authors:  Stuart Cleland; Carlos Corredor; Jia Jia Ye; Coimbatore Srinivas; Stuart A McCluskey
Journal:  World J Transplant       Date:  2016-06-24

5.  Automated stroke volume and pulse pressure variations predict fluid responsiveness in mechanically ventilated patients with obstructive jaundice.

Authors:  Feng Zhao; Peng Wang; Shujun Pei; Weidong Mi; Qiang Fu
Journal:  Int J Clin Exp Med       Date:  2015-11-15

Review 6.  The role of transesophageal echocardiography in the intraoperative period.

Authors:  Veronica Gouveia; Paulo Marcelino; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Curr Cardiol Rev       Date:  2011-08

7.  Perioperative goal-directed hemodynamic therapy based on radial arterial pulse pressure variation and continuous cardiac index trending reduces postoperative complications after major abdominal surgery: a multi-center, prospective, randomized study.

Authors:  Cornelie Salzwedel; Jaume Puig; Arne Carstens; Berthold Bein; Zsolt Molnar; Krisztian Kiss; Ayyaz Hussain; Javier Belda; Mikhail Y Kirov; Samir G Sakka; Daniel A Reuter
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-09-08       Impact factor: 9.097

8.  Dynamic preload indicators decrease when the abdomen is opened.

Authors:  Martijn van Lavieren; Jeroen Veelenturf; Charlotte Hofhuizen; Marion van der Kolk; Johannes van der Hoeven; Peter Pickkers; Joris Lemson; Benno Lansdorp
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2014-10-14       Impact factor: 2.217

9.  Pulse pressure variation shows a direct linear correlation with tidal volume in anesthetized healthy patients.

Authors:  Yi Liu; Jing-Sheng Lou; Wei-Dong Mi; Wei-Xiu Yuan; Qiang Fu; Min Wang; Jing Qu
Journal:  BMC Anesthesiol       Date:  2016-09-08       Impact factor: 2.217

Review 10.  Bench-to-bedside review: functional hemodynamics during surgery - should it be used for all high-risk cases?

Authors:  Azriel Perel; Marit Habicher; Michael Sander
Journal:  Crit Care       Date:  2013-01-28       Impact factor: 9.097

View more

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.