Literature DB >> 19454152

Applying the mental models framework to carbon monoxide risk in northern Mexico.

Heather C Galada1, Patrick L Gurian, Veronica Corella-Barud, Frank G Pérez, Gilberto Velázquez-Angulo, Susana Flores, Teresa Montoya.   

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: Low-income residents of northern Mexico rely on unvented heaters during the winter, a practice that puts them at elevated risk for carbon monoxide intoxication. The goal of this study is to develop a communication protocol for carbon monoxide intoxication risks among the primarily low socioeconomic status population of Ciudad Juárez, Chihuahua, Mexico.
METHODS: The mental models risk communication approach was used to identify important gaps in public understanding. This approach consists of step-by-step assessment of information needs and effectiveness of risk communication efforts by using interviews and surveys.
RESULTS: The mental models process uncovered a key technical misunderstanding, the subject population's belief that carbon monoxide can be seen or smelled, which may result in a risk-prone behavior: failure to use a carbon monoxide detector. A communication protocol was designed to address this and other knowledge gaps, and it produced significant improvements in subjects' knowledge in a pretest/posttest evaluation.
CONCLUSIONS: The mental models process was successful in developing a communication instrument capable of improving knowledge in the subject population. Future research needs include assessing the extent to which this instrument succeeds in changing behavior and reducing the risk of carbon monoxide intoxication. Future interventional efforts may focus on encouraging people to use carbon monoxide detectors.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19454152     DOI: 10.1590/s1020-49892009000300008

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  Rev Panam Salud Publica        ISSN: 1020-4989


  5 in total

1.  Attitudes about carbon monoxide safety in the United States: results from the 2005 and 2006 HealthStyles Survey.

Authors:  Michael E King; Scott A Damon
Journal:  Public Health Rep       Date:  2011 May-Jun       Impact factor: 2.792

2.  Real or illusory? Case studies on the public perception of environmental health risks in the north west of England.

Authors:  Alex G Stewart; Paolo Luria; John Reid; Mary Lyons; Richard Jarvis
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2010-03-18       Impact factor: 3.390

3.  Public Perceptions of Contentious Risk: The Case of Rubber Granulate in the Netherlands.

Authors:  Marion de Vries; Liesbeth Claassen; Marcel Mennen; Aura Timen; Margreet J M Te Wierik; Danielle R M Timmermans
Journal:  Int J Environ Res Public Health       Date:  2019-06-25       Impact factor: 3.390

4.  Differences in comprehending and acting on pandemic health risk information: a qualitative study using mental models.

Authors:  Siv Hilde Berg; Marie Therese Shortt; Henriette Thune; Jo Røislien; Jane K O'Hara; Daniel Adrian Lungu; Siri Wiig
Journal:  BMC Public Health       Date:  2022-07-29       Impact factor: 4.135

5.  Meningococcal W135 Disease Vaccination Intent, the Netherlands, 2018-2019.

Authors:  Marion de Vries; Liesbeth Claassen; Margreet J M Te Wierik; Feray Coban; Albert Wong; Danielle R M Timmermans; Aura Timen
Journal:  Emerg Infect Dis       Date:  2020-07       Impact factor: 6.883

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.