Literature DB >> 19453911

Report of two cases of bladder perforation caused by reservoir of inflatable penile prosthesis.

Andrew C Kramer1, Juddson Chason, Alan Kusakabe.   

Abstract

INTRODUCTION: Rupture of penile prosthesis reservoir into the bladder is an unusual and unexpected occurrence after prosthesis component replacement for malfunction. Scant literature exists describing a pathophysiology, diagnosis, and repair with device salvage. AIM: Our goal is to describe an uncommon event in prosthetic surgery, and discuss the pathophysiology and ways to treat and perhaps avoid this occurrence.
METHODS: Two patients presented with gross hematuria in the recovery room following repair of a cylinder to pump tubing break of their inflatable penile prostheses (IPPs). In each operation, the existing reservoir had been left in situ and refilled once placed in circuit with new cylinders and pump.
RESULTS: The reservoirs had immediately ruptured into the bladder upon refilling, and were identified intravesically on cystoscopy and computed tomography scan. A one-step approach can be done to salvage the device, remove the eroded reservoir with bladder repair, and new reservoir placed directly into appropriate space. Interpretation. During IPP revision, even when a reservoir is not manipulated simple tubing repair performed, gross hematuria in the recovery room likely signals bladder perforation. We include recommendations for reservoir management with implant revision, as well as surgical management and prevention of this complication.
CONCLUSIONS: Bladder perforation can be caused by penile implant revision even when the old reservoir is not manipulated. If this complication occurs, it can be surgically managed immediately. This can also potentially be avoided.

Entities:  

Mesh:

Year:  2009        PMID: 19453911     DOI: 10.1111/j.1743-6109.2009.01277.x

Source DB:  PubMed          Journal:  J Sex Med        ISSN: 1743-6095            Impact factor:   3.802


  5 in total

Review 1.  Alternative Reservoir and Balloon Placement in Complex Patients Undergoing Urologic Prostheses.

Authors:  Travis J Pagliara; Daniel W Smith; Boyd R Viers; Allen F Morey
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2018-04-13       Impact factor: 3.092

Review 2.  Damage Control Considerations During IPP Surgery.

Authors:  David Y Yang; Tobias S Kohler
Journal:  Curr Urol Rep       Date:  2019-01-30       Impact factor: 3.092

3.  A retrospective analysis of risk factors for IPP reservoir entry into the peritoneum after abdominal wall placement.

Authors:  M S Gross; D S Stember; B B Garber; P E Perito
Journal:  Int J Impot Res       Date:  2017-06-29       Impact factor: 2.896

4.  The Anatomical Relationships in the Space of Retzius for Penile Implants: An MRI Analysis.

Authors:  Nahid Punjani; Leonardo Monteiro; John F Sullivan; Jose Flores; Yanira Ortega; Kazuhito Matsushita; Judy M Choi; Dean Elterman; Oguz Akin; Christian J Nelson; Jaspreet S Sandhu; John P Mulhall
Journal:  J Sex Med       Date:  2021-09-20       Impact factor: 3.937

5.  Pararectal Migration of a Malleable Rod: An Unusual Late Complication.

Authors:  Ibrahim Kucukturkmen; Yusuf Kadir Topcu; Tansu Degirmenci; Ozgu Aydogdu; Ibrahim Halil Bozkurt; Serkan Yarimoglu; Salih Polat
Journal:  World J Mens Health       Date:  2016-08-23       Impact factor: 5.400

  5 in total

北京卡尤迪生物科技股份有限公司 © 2022-2023.